Securing a social licence for development projects: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of land expropriation cases in China

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107865
Xiuyun Yang , Meng Chen , Qiuping Chen
{"title":"Securing a social licence for development projects: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of land expropriation cases in China","authors":"Xiuyun Yang ,&nbsp;Meng Chen ,&nbsp;Qiuping Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study delves into the complexities of development projects and explores the concept of social licence to operate (SLO) as a means to secure community support and mitigate conflicts in China, where the conditions for obtaining SLO are poorly understood. By applying the SLO pyramid model and measurement scales and employing the fsQCA method, we focus on six key conditions: economic fairness, procedural fairness, government conflict resolution capacity, the project implementer's trustworthiness, the reactivity of affected residents, inherent project risks, and the causal pathways influencing SLO levels. Our findings suggest that two causal pathways—risk mitigation and public interest projects with fair implementation—are crucial for achieving high-level SLO. Additionally, the regional context and stakeholder interactions are pivotal for SLO success, with governance dysfunction and community–developer friction being pathways to low SLO levels. We exemplify each pathway with detailed, context-specific case studies to ensure explanatory power. This study significantly contributes to the understanding of the dynamic interactions among various factors and offers practical recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders to enhance SLO in development projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 107865"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000629","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delves into the complexities of development projects and explores the concept of social licence to operate (SLO) as a means to secure community support and mitigate conflicts in China, where the conditions for obtaining SLO are poorly understood. By applying the SLO pyramid model and measurement scales and employing the fsQCA method, we focus on six key conditions: economic fairness, procedural fairness, government conflict resolution capacity, the project implementer's trustworthiness, the reactivity of affected residents, inherent project risks, and the causal pathways influencing SLO levels. Our findings suggest that two causal pathways—risk mitigation and public interest projects with fair implementation—are crucial for achieving high-level SLO. Additionally, the regional context and stakeholder interactions are pivotal for SLO success, with governance dysfunction and community–developer friction being pathways to low SLO levels. We exemplify each pathway with detailed, context-specific case studies to ensure explanatory power. This study significantly contributes to the understanding of the dynamic interactions among various factors and offers practical recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders to enhance SLO in development projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为发展项目争取社会许可:中国征地案例的模糊集定性比较分析
本研究深入研究了发展项目的复杂性,并探讨了社会运营许可(SLO)的概念,作为在中国获得社区支持和缓解冲突的一种手段,在中国,获得SLO的条件知之甚少。本文运用金字塔模型和测量量表,采用fsQCA方法,重点分析了经济公平、程序公平、政府冲突解决能力、项目实施者可信度、受影响居民的反应性、项目固有风险以及影响SLO水平的因果路径等6个关键条件。我们的研究结果表明,两种因果路径——风险缓解和公平实施的公共利益项目——对于实现高水平的SLO至关重要。此外,区域背景和利益相关者的互动对SLO的成功至关重要,治理功能障碍和社区开发者摩擦是降低SLO水平的途径。我们用详细的、具体的案例研究来举例说明每个途径,以确保解释力。本研究有助于理解各种因素之间的动态相互作用,并为政策制定者和利益相关者提供切实可行的建议,以加强发展项目中的SLO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the impact of establishing national key ecological function zones on land resource allocation Measurement, prediction, and interpretation of industrial carbon unlocking efficiency Revealing the transfer and impacts of ecological footprint embodied in interprovincial trade across China's metacoupled system Rethinking aluminum metabolism under China's new “old-for-new” policy: characteristics and environmental implications System resilience measurement using input-output disaster analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1