A critical evaluation of non-profit organizations’ contributions to disaster management: Historical perspectives and future trends in operations management research

Zahra Hosseinifard , Haerold Dean Layaoen , Ahmad Abareshi , Babak Abbasi , Jiuh-Biing Sheu
{"title":"A critical evaluation of non-profit organizations’ contributions to disaster management: Historical perspectives and future trends in operations management research","authors":"Zahra Hosseinifard ,&nbsp;Haerold Dean Layaoen ,&nbsp;Ahmad Abareshi ,&nbsp;Babak Abbasi ,&nbsp;Jiuh-Biing Sheu","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.103989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global crises and disasters continue to intensify, the importance of non-profit organizations (NPOs) in ensuring efficient coordination and optimal use of resources is becoming more critical. This systematic literature review focuses on the essential roles that NPOs play in humanitarian efforts within disaster management contexts. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, the review compiles insights from 847 articles published in ABS-ranked journals between 1982 and April 2024. From this extensive analysis, four distinct clusters were identified to assess significant research trends in the field. These trends encompass Disaster Resilience, Emergency Relief, Humanitarian Supply Chain Management, and Post-disaster Response. Subsequently, the roles of NPOs within these clusters are analyzed in relation to the four core humanitarian principles endorsed by the United Nations in General Assembly Resolutions 46/182 and 58/114: humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence. Despite the extensive body of literature on the role of NPOs in humanitarian operations, several research gaps have been identified: 1) Resource Overlap: NPOs frequently depend on shared resources (such as volunteers). Future studies should focus on developing strategies to improve coordination among NPOs to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of resource utilization; 2) Response to Man-made Disasters: Given the rise in man-made crises, such as the Ukraine conflict and the Gaza war, it is essential to investigate how NPOs can play a more effective role in humanitarian operations under these conditions. Political biases and bilateral relationships often restrict government involvement, highlighting the critical need for NPOs to step in and provide essential support during such crises. 3) Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): future research should explore how the actions of NPOs in humanitarian operations align with and contribute to the SDGs. Such insights would help inform policymakers, practitioners, and scholars, promoting a more strategic approach to harnessing the capabilities of NPOs in humanitarian settings. Ultimately, this systematic review aims to serve as a valuable resource for expanding knowledge, guiding future research efforts, and improving the effectiveness of NPOs in humanitarian operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 103989"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525000304","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As global crises and disasters continue to intensify, the importance of non-profit organizations (NPOs) in ensuring efficient coordination and optimal use of resources is becoming more critical. This systematic literature review focuses on the essential roles that NPOs play in humanitarian efforts within disaster management contexts. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, the review compiles insights from 847 articles published in ABS-ranked journals between 1982 and April 2024. From this extensive analysis, four distinct clusters were identified to assess significant research trends in the field. These trends encompass Disaster Resilience, Emergency Relief, Humanitarian Supply Chain Management, and Post-disaster Response. Subsequently, the roles of NPOs within these clusters are analyzed in relation to the four core humanitarian principles endorsed by the United Nations in General Assembly Resolutions 46/182 and 58/114: humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence. Despite the extensive body of literature on the role of NPOs in humanitarian operations, several research gaps have been identified: 1) Resource Overlap: NPOs frequently depend on shared resources (such as volunteers). Future studies should focus on developing strategies to improve coordination among NPOs to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of resource utilization; 2) Response to Man-made Disasters: Given the rise in man-made crises, such as the Ukraine conflict and the Gaza war, it is essential to investigate how NPOs can play a more effective role in humanitarian operations under these conditions. Political biases and bilateral relationships often restrict government involvement, highlighting the critical need for NPOs to step in and provide essential support during such crises. 3) Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): future research should explore how the actions of NPOs in humanitarian operations align with and contribute to the SDGs. Such insights would help inform policymakers, practitioners, and scholars, promoting a more strategic approach to harnessing the capabilities of NPOs in humanitarian settings. Ultimately, this systematic review aims to serve as a valuable resource for expanding knowledge, guiding future research efforts, and improving the effectiveness of NPOs in humanitarian operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非营利组织对灾害管理贡献的批判性评价:运营管理研究的历史观点和未来趋势
随着全球危机和灾害的不断加剧,非营利组织在确保有效协调和最佳利用资源方面的重要性变得越来越重要。这篇系统的文献综述着重于在灾害管理背景下,非营利组织在人道主义工作中发挥的重要作用。遵循PRISMA指南,该综述汇编了1982年至2024年4月期间发表在abs排名期刊上的847篇文章的见解。从这个广泛的分析中,确定了四个不同的集群来评估该领域的重要研究趋势。这些趋势包括抗灾能力、紧急救援、人道主义供应链管理和灾后响应。随后,根据联合国大会第46/182号和第58/114号决议核可的人道主义四项核心原则:人道、中立、公正和独立,分析了本国专业人员在这些集群中的作用。尽管关于本国专业组织在人道主义行动中的作用有大量文献,但仍发现了一些研究空白:1)资源重叠:本国专业组织经常依赖共享资源(如志愿者)。今后的研究应侧重于制定战略,以改善本国专业人员之间的协调,最大限度地提高资源利用的效率和效力;2)应对人为灾难:鉴于乌克兰冲突和加沙战争等人为危机的增加,有必要研究非营利组织如何在这些条件下在人道主义行动中发挥更有效的作用。政治偏见和双边关系往往限制了政府的参与,凸显了非营利组织在此类危机期间介入并提供基本支持的迫切需要。3)与可持续发展目标(sdg)保持一致:未来的研究应探讨非营利组织在人道主义行动中的行动如何与可持续发展目标保持一致并为之做出贡献。这些见解将有助于为政策制定者、实践者和学者提供信息,促进在人道主义环境中利用非营利组织能力的更具战略性的方法。最终,这一系统审查旨在成为扩展知识、指导未来研究工作和提高本国专业人员在人道主义行动中的有效性的宝贵资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
E-commerce supply chain network with flexible leasing capacity of fulfillment centers using robust optimization Natural disaster risks in seaports for global petroleum trades To wait or to transfer? A three-level optimization framework for intermodal transfer coordination in first train timetabling and bus bridging services management Stabilised branch-and-check method for optimising multi-runway aircraft landing problem modelled through stochastic programming with learning-driven arrival time predictions Capacity planning for platform services: Agent availability, compensation, and dual sourcing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1