Milestone payments in alliances: The moderating effect of equity ownership and network centrality

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103192
Wanrong Hou , Edward Levitas , Taoyong Su , Sibin Wu
{"title":"Milestone payments in alliances: The moderating effect of equity ownership and network centrality","authors":"Wanrong Hou ,&nbsp;Edward Levitas ,&nbsp;Taoyong Su ,&nbsp;Sibin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has produced ambiguous and incomplete conclusions on how milestone payments influence alliance performance. By integrating the contractual governance framework with insights from behavioral economics on intrinsic motivation, this research investigates how the structure of cash payments between research and development partners impacts alliance performance. Analyzing a dataset of 140 pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical New Molecular Entities approved by the FDA from 1993 to 2016, we first demonstrate that increased milestone payments reduce alliance performance. We then show that this adverse effect is attenuated when the complement supplier holds equity in the technology producer. Lastly, we provide evidence that the network centrality of the complement supplier offsets the negative impact of milestone payments on performance. These findings bridge the gap between behavioral and contractual views, underscoring the importance of incorporating both perspectives in studying alliance outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 103192"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has produced ambiguous and incomplete conclusions on how milestone payments influence alliance performance. By integrating the contractual governance framework with insights from behavioral economics on intrinsic motivation, this research investigates how the structure of cash payments between research and development partners impacts alliance performance. Analyzing a dataset of 140 pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical New Molecular Entities approved by the FDA from 1993 to 2016, we first demonstrate that increased milestone payments reduce alliance performance. We then show that this adverse effect is attenuated when the complement supplier holds equity in the technology producer. Lastly, we provide evidence that the network centrality of the complement supplier offsets the negative impact of milestone payments on performance. These findings bridge the gap between behavioral and contractual views, underscoring the importance of incorporating both perspectives in studying alliance outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联盟中的里程碑支付:股权和网络中心性的调节作用
先前的研究对里程碑付款如何影响联盟绩效得出了模糊和不完整的结论。本研究将契约治理框架与行为经济学的内在动机相结合,探讨了研发伙伴之间的现金支付结构对联盟绩效的影响。我们分析了1993年至2016年FDA批准的140个制药和生物制药新分子实体的数据集,首先证明了增加的里程碑付款会降低联盟的绩效。然后我们表明,当互补供应商持有技术生产商的股权时,这种不利影响减弱。最后,我们提供的证据表明,补充供应商的网络中心性抵消了里程碑付款对绩效的负面影响。这些发现弥合了行为和契约观点之间的差距,强调了在研究联盟结果时结合这两种观点的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
In and out: The relationship between university in-licensing and out-licensing by firms in therapeutic biotechnology Knowledge spillovers from green technologies Digital transformation through innovation: The human-AI decision spectrum Innovation in climate adaptation technologies: A catalyst for financial market dynamics? Value co-creation in B2B industrial digital platforms: A platform-native perspective under service-dominant logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1