Influence of borate chemical treatment on adhesive bond performance of Douglas fir and grand fir laminates

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY European Journal of Wood and Wood Products Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s00107-025-02218-y
A. T. Adeniran, K. Englund, H. Li, J-W Kim
{"title":"Influence of borate chemical treatment on adhesive bond performance of Douglas fir and grand fir laminates","authors":"A. T. Adeniran,&nbsp;K. Englund,&nbsp;H. Li,&nbsp;J-W Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00107-025-02218-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates borate treatments of Douglas fir (<i>Pseudotsuga menziesii</i>) and grand fir (<i>Abies grandis</i>) lamstock and their impact on adhesive bonding performance. Lamstock were treated using three different methods (dip, double vacuum, and vacuum/pressure) with the aim to achieve a target retention of 0.1% (w/w) B₂O₃. The degree to which B₂O₃ was sorbed by the lamstocks was evaluated using image analysis technique. Treated lamstocks were bonded with one component polyurethane adhesive, and bond performance was evaluated by a cyclic delamination and block shear test. Results revealed that the uptake of treating solution differs by treatment methods and species. Uptake by vacuum/pressure-treated lamstocks is highest while uptake in dip treated lamstocks is the lowest. Grand fir had higher uptake values than Douglas fir throughout all treatments. The level of retention of B₂O₃ was influenced by treating solution concentration and wood properties. Dip treated lamstock showed limited spread of retained B₂O₃ with bulk of the B₂O₃ retained close to the surface. All conditions of grand fir, planed or unplaned, were able to meet the requirement of ANSI A190.1-2022 for block shear wood failure and total delamination, while unplaned specimens of Douglas-fir did not meet the requirement of ANSI A190.1-2022. Borate treatments increased the hydrophilicity of the lamstocks, causing the potential formation of superficial bonds between the adhesive and the accumulated chemicals on the surface of the unplaned dip treated lamina. This study presents insightful information about maximizing the chemical treatment of B₂O₃ to have the least possible impact on adhesive bond performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":550,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","volume":"83 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-025-02218-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates borate treatments of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and grand fir (Abies grandis) lamstock and their impact on adhesive bonding performance. Lamstock were treated using three different methods (dip, double vacuum, and vacuum/pressure) with the aim to achieve a target retention of 0.1% (w/w) B₂O₃. The degree to which B₂O₃ was sorbed by the lamstocks was evaluated using image analysis technique. Treated lamstocks were bonded with one component polyurethane adhesive, and bond performance was evaluated by a cyclic delamination and block shear test. Results revealed that the uptake of treating solution differs by treatment methods and species. Uptake by vacuum/pressure-treated lamstocks is highest while uptake in dip treated lamstocks is the lowest. Grand fir had higher uptake values than Douglas fir throughout all treatments. The level of retention of B₂O₃ was influenced by treating solution concentration and wood properties. Dip treated lamstock showed limited spread of retained B₂O₃ with bulk of the B₂O₃ retained close to the surface. All conditions of grand fir, planed or unplaned, were able to meet the requirement of ANSI A190.1-2022 for block shear wood failure and total delamination, while unplaned specimens of Douglas-fir did not meet the requirement of ANSI A190.1-2022. Borate treatments increased the hydrophilicity of the lamstocks, causing the potential formation of superficial bonds between the adhesive and the accumulated chemicals on the surface of the unplaned dip treated lamina. This study presents insightful information about maximizing the chemical treatment of B₂O₃ to have the least possible impact on adhesive bond performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products reports on original research and new developments in the field of wood and wood products and their biological, chemical, physical as well as mechanical and technological properties, processes and uses. Subjects range from roundwood to wood based products, composite materials and structural applications, with related jointing techniques. Moreover, it deals with wood as a chemical raw material, source of energy as well as with inter-disciplinary aspects of environmental assessment and international markets. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products aims at promoting international scientific communication and transfer of new technologies from research into practice.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of milling performance of thermally modified wood based on machine learning Physical and mechanical properties of wood treated with chitosan-caffeine formulations Focus on hydrochars produced from hydrothermal liquefaction of beech wood, soda lignin and black liquor Long-term hygrothermal performance assessment of on-site wood-framed walls based on sensor monitoring and machine learning Influence of borate chemical treatment on adhesive bond performance of Douglas fir and grand fir laminates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1