Ultrasound-On-Chip With Semiconductor Silicon Chip Array for Transcutaneous Salivary Gland Injections: A Pilot Cadaver Study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/lio2.70102
David Y. Goldrich, Shivam Patel, Bao Y. Sciscent, Hanel W. Eberly, Neerav Goyal
{"title":"Ultrasound-On-Chip With Semiconductor Silicon Chip Array for Transcutaneous Salivary Gland Injections: A Pilot Cadaver Study","authors":"David Y. Goldrich,&nbsp;Shivam Patel,&nbsp;Bao Y. Sciscent,&nbsp;Hanel W. Eberly,&nbsp;Neerav Goyal","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Ultrasound (US) is a well-established imaging modality for the evaluation of head and neck anatomy. The Butterfly iQ is a handheld ultrasound device that uses a semiconductor silicon chip array (capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers, CMUT) instead of piezoelectric crystals used by traditional ultrasounds (TUS), but its accuracy has not been investigated with respect to salivary gland imaging and associated transcutaneous procedures. We aimed to perform a pilot cadaver study to determine the utility and fidelity of the CMUT-US for parotid and submandibular gland imaging and guiding transcutaneous gland injection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One otolaryngologist injected 0.5 mL of dye into three distinct salivary gland sites (two intraparotid sites and one submandibular gland site) bilaterally on 20 cadavers (<i>n</i> = 120 glands), using either CMUT-US or TUS to guide injection. The cadavers were dissected to identify whether the dye was accurately injected into each site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The accuracies of CMUT-US and TUS-guided injections in the parotid gland were 95.0% (<i>n</i> = 40) and 90.0% (<i>n</i> = 40), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.69). In the submandibular gland, the accuracies for the CMUT-US (<i>n</i> = 20) and TUS (<i>n</i> = 20) were both 75.0% (<i>p</i> = 0.72). Across all salivary gland sites, injection accuracy was 88.3% (<i>n</i> = 60) using TUS versus 85.0% (<i>n</i> = 60) using CMUT-US (<i>p</i> = 0.79). No significant differences between modalities were seen in the accuracy of injection based on injection subsite, laterality, cadaver sex, or age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study demonstrates that CMUT-US-guided salivary gland injection offers similar high accuracy and reproducibility to TUS-guided injection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>V.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Ultrasound (US) is a well-established imaging modality for the evaluation of head and neck anatomy. The Butterfly iQ is a handheld ultrasound device that uses a semiconductor silicon chip array (capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers, CMUT) instead of piezoelectric crystals used by traditional ultrasounds (TUS), but its accuracy has not been investigated with respect to salivary gland imaging and associated transcutaneous procedures. We aimed to perform a pilot cadaver study to determine the utility and fidelity of the CMUT-US for parotid and submandibular gland imaging and guiding transcutaneous gland injection.

Methods

One otolaryngologist injected 0.5 mL of dye into three distinct salivary gland sites (two intraparotid sites and one submandibular gland site) bilaterally on 20 cadavers (n = 120 glands), using either CMUT-US or TUS to guide injection. The cadavers were dissected to identify whether the dye was accurately injected into each site.

Results

The accuracies of CMUT-US and TUS-guided injections in the parotid gland were 95.0% (n = 40) and 90.0% (n = 40), respectively (p = 0.69). In the submandibular gland, the accuracies for the CMUT-US (n = 20) and TUS (n = 20) were both 75.0% (p = 0.72). Across all salivary gland sites, injection accuracy was 88.3% (n = 60) using TUS versus 85.0% (n = 60) using CMUT-US (p = 0.79). No significant differences between modalities were seen in the accuracy of injection based on injection subsite, laterality, cadaver sex, or age.

Conclusion

This pilot study demonstrates that CMUT-US-guided salivary gland injection offers similar high accuracy and reproducibility to TUS-guided injection.

Level of Evidence

V.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Severity, Age, Sex, Sleep, Anxiety, and Their Correlation Analysis of 1739 Tinnitus Patients Ultrasound-On-Chip With Semiconductor Silicon Chip Array for Transcutaneous Salivary Gland Injections: A Pilot Cadaver Study Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Training and Service Delivery: An International Survey Evaluating YouTube Videos for Resident Education in Free Flap Surgery Quality Improvement of Single-Institution Craniofacial Center Multidisciplinary Meetings Using Standardized Meeting Guides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1