Climate Models Struggle to Simulate Observed North Pacific Jet Trends, Even Accounting for Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Trends

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geophysical Research Letters Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1029/2024GL113561
Matthew Patterson, Christopher H. O’Reilly
{"title":"Climate Models Struggle to Simulate Observed North Pacific Jet Trends, Even Accounting for Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Trends","authors":"Matthew Patterson,&nbsp;Christopher H. O’Reilly","doi":"10.1029/2024GL113561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We show that the wintertime (December-January-February) North Pacific jet in ERA5 has shifted northwards over the satellite-era (1979–2023) at a faster rate than any of the state-of-the-art coupled climate models used in this study. Differences in tropical sea surface temperature (SST) trends can only partially explain the discrepancy in jet trends between models and observations and a small minority of simulations forced with observed SSTs match the magnitude of the observed jet trend. However, analysis of longer-term jet variability in reanalysis suggests that the jet trend has not clearly emerged from multi-decadal internal climate variability. Consequently, it is unclear whether the difference in observed and modeled jet trends arises due to differing responses to anthropogenic forcing or overly weak long-term internal variability in models. These results have important implications for future climate projections for North America and motivate further research into the underlying causes of long-term jet trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL113561","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL113561","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We show that the wintertime (December-January-February) North Pacific jet in ERA5 has shifted northwards over the satellite-era (1979–2023) at a faster rate than any of the state-of-the-art coupled climate models used in this study. Differences in tropical sea surface temperature (SST) trends can only partially explain the discrepancy in jet trends between models and observations and a small minority of simulations forced with observed SSTs match the magnitude of the observed jet trend. However, analysis of longer-term jet variability in reanalysis suggests that the jet trend has not clearly emerged from multi-decadal internal climate variability. Consequently, it is unclear whether the difference in observed and modeled jet trends arises due to differing responses to anthropogenic forcing or overly weak long-term internal variability in models. These results have important implications for future climate projections for North America and motivate further research into the underlying causes of long-term jet trends.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候模式难以模拟观测到的北太平洋喷流趋势,甚至考虑到热带太平洋海面温度趋势
我们表明,ERA5的冬季(12月至1月至2月)北太平洋急流在卫星时代(1979-2023)以比本研究中使用的任何最先进的耦合气候模式更快的速度向北移动。热带海表温度(SST)趋势的差异只能部分解释模式与观测之间的喷流趋势差异,并且少数用观测到的海表温度强迫的模拟与观测到的喷流趋势的大小相匹配。然而,对再分析中较长期喷流变率的分析表明,喷流趋势并未明显地从多年代际内部气候变率中出现。因此,尚不清楚观测到的和模拟的喷流趋势的差异是由于对人为强迫的不同响应还是模式中过弱的长期内部变率造成的。这些结果对北美未来的气候预测具有重要意义,并激发了对长期喷气趋势的潜在原因的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Research Letters
Geophysical Research Letters 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
1588
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.
期刊最新文献
Stress Transfer From Slow Slip Events to Earthquake Swarms as a Cycle in the Southernmost Ryukyu Subduction Zone First Quantitative Results on the Response of Green and Red Line Dayglow Emissions to Solar Flares of Different Magnitudes Classification of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Based on Turbulent Kinetic Energy Budget Terms Using Machine-Learning Methods Airborne Radar Reveals Area-Wide Decadal Increase of Surface Mass Balance on the Plateau in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica Bromine Enrichment Signal in Svalbard Shallow Cores Reflects Changes of Seasonal Sea Ice Variability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1