Are dispersal and dormancy alternative strategies for overcoming environmental variability?

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70042
Kelley F. Slimon, Megan C. Szojka, Rachel M. Germain
{"title":"Are dispersal and dormancy alternative strategies for overcoming environmental variability?","authors":"Kelley F. Slimon,&nbsp;Megan C. Szojka,&nbsp;Rachel M. Germain","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dispersal and dormancy serve as strategies for persistence in varying and uncertain environments and are critical to ecological models of biodiversity maintenance. Theories of specific ecological scenarios that favor dispersal, dormancy, or their covariance are rarely tested empirically, particularly in response to realistically complex patterns of spatiotemporal environmental variation. To resolve these complexities, we collected 20 populations of <i>Vulpia microstachys</i>, an annual grass native to California, from the field and grew them in a greenhouse, and on the offspring generation measured seed dispersal ability and seed dormancy rates. We hypothesized that seed dormancy rates, but not dispersal abilities, would be highest in populations from more productive, temporally variable sites, causing dispersal and dormancy to evolve independently—in other words, we leveraged evolved differences among populations to identify what ecological strategy (i.e., dispersal, dormancy, or both) is most likely to evolve at different parts of a variability gradient. Our data suggest that both dispersal and dormancy evolve to combat different axes and scales of spatial heterogeneity and can evolve independently (thus, they are not forced to covary). Most surprisingly, seed dormancy appears to have evolved as a strategy for overcoming microgeographic heterogeneity, an outcome that to our knowledge has not been considered by theory; we confirm the plausibility of this conclusion with a simulation. In sum, we provide much needed empirical data on the evolution of ecological strategies for coping with environmental variance, as well as a new perspective on the ecological function dormancy provides in heterogeneous landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dispersal and dormancy serve as strategies for persistence in varying and uncertain environments and are critical to ecological models of biodiversity maintenance. Theories of specific ecological scenarios that favor dispersal, dormancy, or their covariance are rarely tested empirically, particularly in response to realistically complex patterns of spatiotemporal environmental variation. To resolve these complexities, we collected 20 populations of Vulpia microstachys, an annual grass native to California, from the field and grew them in a greenhouse, and on the offspring generation measured seed dispersal ability and seed dormancy rates. We hypothesized that seed dormancy rates, but not dispersal abilities, would be highest in populations from more productive, temporally variable sites, causing dispersal and dormancy to evolve independently—in other words, we leveraged evolved differences among populations to identify what ecological strategy (i.e., dispersal, dormancy, or both) is most likely to evolve at different parts of a variability gradient. Our data suggest that both dispersal and dormancy evolve to combat different axes and scales of spatial heterogeneity and can evolve independently (thus, they are not forced to covary). Most surprisingly, seed dormancy appears to have evolved as a strategy for overcoming microgeographic heterogeneity, an outcome that to our knowledge has not been considered by theory; we confirm the plausibility of this conclusion with a simulation. In sum, we provide much needed empirical data on the evolution of ecological strategies for coping with environmental variance, as well as a new perspective on the ecological function dormancy provides in heterogeneous landscapes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分散和休眠是克服环境变异性的替代策略吗?
分散和休眠是在变化和不确定的环境中生存的策略,是维持生物多样性的生态模式的关键。关于有利于扩散、休眠或其协方差的特定生态情景的理论很少得到经验检验,特别是在响应现实复杂的时空环境变化模式时。为了解决这些复杂的问题,我们从野外收集了20个加利福尼亚原生一年生草Vulpia microstachys种群,并在温室中种植,并对后代进行了种子传播能力和种子休眠率的测量。我们假设种子休眠率,而不是传播能力,在生产力更高、时间变化更大的种群中是最高的,这导致了传播和休眠的独立进化——换句话说,我们利用种群之间的进化差异来确定在变异梯度的不同部分最有可能进化的生态策略(即,传播、休眠或两者)。我们的数据表明,分散和休眠都是为了对抗不同的空间异质性轴和尺度而进化的,并且可以独立进化(因此,它们不会被迫协变)。最令人惊讶的是,种子休眠似乎已经进化成一种克服微观地理异质性的策略,据我们所知,理论还没有考虑到这一结果;我们用模拟验证了这一结论的合理性。总之,我们为应对环境变化的生态策略演变提供了必要的经验数据,并为异质性景观中生态功能休眠提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Functional distinctiveness and rarity highlight climate vulnerability of mountain birds Adaptive responses to environmental variability in rotifers: Integrating plasticity and bet hedging in dormancy exit Associational effects need to be studied within an optimal foraging framework Increased root‐derived carbon buffers soil carbon loss under simultaneous warming and nitrogen addition Social and structural traits influence species gains while resources influence species losses in a native grassland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1