Development of a predictive model for deep vein thrombosis in burn patients based on the Caprini Risk Assessment Scale.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/EBEW2103
Lanzhen Xie, Aihua Xu, Dandan Cai, Jizhong Ma
{"title":"Development of a predictive model for deep vein thrombosis in burn patients based on the Caprini Risk Assessment Scale.","authors":"Lanzhen Xie, Aihua Xu, Dandan Cai, Jizhong Ma","doi":"10.62347/EBEW2103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the applicability of the Caprini Risk Assessment Scale in burn patients for evaluating the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted involving 278 burn patients from March 2021 to March 2023, with an additional independent test set of 119 patients for external validation. Patients were stratified into DVT and non-DVT groups based on the DVT incidence within one month after burn. The Caprini Risk Assessment Scale was employed to calculate scores and determine risk factors. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified significant risk factors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the model's predictive power.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Caprini score was significantly higher in the DVT group (6.61 ± 2.64) compared to the non-DVT group (4.89 ± 2.36; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Key risk factors included older age, increased body mass index (BMI), and a personal or family history of thrombosis. DVT patients were more prone to higher Caprini scores and classified as 'very high risk'. Logistic regression demonstrated a positive correlation between Caprini scores, risk stratification, and DVT incidence (β = 0.284, O<i>R</i> = 1.329; β = 0.466, O<i>R</i> = 1.594, respectively). The predictive model displayed strong discriminatory power, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.853 in the training set and 0.937 in the test set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Caprini Risk Assessment Scale is an effective tool for predicting DVT risk in burn patients, aiding in risk stratification and targeted prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 1","pages":"538-549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/EBEW2103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the applicability of the Caprini Risk Assessment Scale in burn patients for evaluating the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted involving 278 burn patients from March 2021 to March 2023, with an additional independent test set of 119 patients for external validation. Patients were stratified into DVT and non-DVT groups based on the DVT incidence within one month after burn. The Caprini Risk Assessment Scale was employed to calculate scores and determine risk factors. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified significant risk factors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the model's predictive power.

Results: The mean Caprini score was significantly higher in the DVT group (6.61 ± 2.64) compared to the non-DVT group (4.89 ± 2.36; P < 0.001). Key risk factors included older age, increased body mass index (BMI), and a personal or family history of thrombosis. DVT patients were more prone to higher Caprini scores and classified as 'very high risk'. Logistic regression demonstrated a positive correlation between Caprini scores, risk stratification, and DVT incidence (β = 0.284, OR = 1.329; β = 0.466, OR = 1.594, respectively). The predictive model displayed strong discriminatory power, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.853 in the training set and 0.937 in the test set.

Conclusion: The Caprini Risk Assessment Scale is an effective tool for predicting DVT risk in burn patients, aiding in risk stratification and targeted prophylaxis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于capriini风险评估量表的烧伤患者深静脉血栓预测模型的建立。
目的:探讨capriini风险评估量表在烧伤患者深静脉血栓形成风险评估中的适用性。方法:对2021年3月至2023年3月期间278例烧伤患者进行回顾性病例对照研究,并另设119例患者独立试验集进行外部验证。根据烧伤后1个月内DVT发生率将患者分为DVT组和非DVT组。采用卡普里尼风险评定量表计算得分,确定危险因素。多变量logistic回归分析确定了显著的危险因素,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估了模型的预测能力。结果:DVT组平均Caprini评分(6.61±2.64)明显高于非DVT组(4.89±2.36;P < 0.001)。主要的危险因素包括年龄较大,身体质量指数(BMI)增加,以及个人或家族血栓病史。深静脉血栓患者的卡普里尼评分更高,被归为“非常高风险”。Logistic回归结果显示capriti评分、风险分层与DVT发生率呈正相关(β = 0.284, OR = 1.329;β = 0.466, OR = 1.594)。该预测模型具有较强的判别能力,训练集的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.853,测试集的AUC为0.937。结论:capriini风险评估量表是预测烧伤患者DVT风险的有效工具,有助于风险分层和有针对性的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Construction of an auxiliary diagnostic model for secondary pulmonary bacterial infection in influenza based on routine detection indicators. Differential impact of hemiplegia severity stratification on post-hemiarthroplasty dislocation in elderly intertrochanteric fracture patients. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy and safety between ciprofol and propofol in elderly patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. Diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion using thoracoscopy combined with confocal endomicroscopy: a case report. Construction and validation of a multicenter predictive model for neonatal hypoglycemia risk in infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1