Efficacy of comprehensive nursing in stabilizing perioperative hemodynamic indicators and reducing complications in patients under general anesthesia.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/YFXG8685
Chendong Yuan, Baozhu Zhou, Ningyan Wang, Yao Guo, Zhenzhen Hu
{"title":"Efficacy of comprehensive nursing in stabilizing perioperative hemodynamic indicators and reducing complications in patients under general anesthesia.","authors":"Chendong Yuan, Baozhu Zhou, Ningyan Wang, Yao Guo, Zhenzhen Hu","doi":"10.62347/YFXG8685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of a comprehensive nursing model on perioperative experiences and complications in patients undergoing general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 98 patients who underwent general anesthesia at the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University from August 2022 to March 2024. Patients were divided into a traditional group (TG, n=41) and a comprehensive nursing group (CG, n=57) based on their perioperative nursing model. Surgical data, recovery metrics, stress-related indicators before and after surgery, and perioperative hemodynamic indicators were compared between the two groups. Postoperative cognitive function and complication rates were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CG had a shorter hospital stay compared to the TG (<i>P</i><0.05). On postoperative day 1, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels in the CG were lower than those in the TG (<i>P</i><0.05). At T3 and T4, systolic blood pressure in the CG was lower than of the TG (P<0.05), and at T1, diastolic blood pressure was also lower in the CG (P<0.05). At T5, the heart rate in the CG was lower than of the TG (P<0.05). Awakening and extubation times were shorter in the CG than the TG (both <i>P</i><0.05). On postoperative day 1, Mini-Mental State Examination scores were higher in the CG than the TG (<i>P</i><0.05), while Visual Analogue Scale scores were lower (P<0.05). The total incidence of perioperative complications was 8.77% (5/57) in the CG, significantly lower than 26.83% (11/41) in the TG (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive nursing interventions can effectively reduce perioperative stress, shorten emergence and extubation times, mitigate short-term cognitive decline, and decrease perioperative complications in patients undergoing general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 1","pages":"603-611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/YFXG8685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a comprehensive nursing model on perioperative experiences and complications in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 98 patients who underwent general anesthesia at the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University from August 2022 to March 2024. Patients were divided into a traditional group (TG, n=41) and a comprehensive nursing group (CG, n=57) based on their perioperative nursing model. Surgical data, recovery metrics, stress-related indicators before and after surgery, and perioperative hemodynamic indicators were compared between the two groups. Postoperative cognitive function and complication rates were also assessed.

Results: The CG had a shorter hospital stay compared to the TG (P<0.05). On postoperative day 1, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels in the CG were lower than those in the TG (P<0.05). At T3 and T4, systolic blood pressure in the CG was lower than of the TG (P<0.05), and at T1, diastolic blood pressure was also lower in the CG (P<0.05). At T5, the heart rate in the CG was lower than of the TG (P<0.05). Awakening and extubation times were shorter in the CG than the TG (both P<0.05). On postoperative day 1, Mini-Mental State Examination scores were higher in the CG than the TG (P<0.05), while Visual Analogue Scale scores were lower (P<0.05). The total incidence of perioperative complications was 8.77% (5/57) in the CG, significantly lower than 26.83% (11/41) in the TG (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Comprehensive nursing interventions can effectively reduce perioperative stress, shorten emergence and extubation times, mitigate short-term cognitive decline, and decrease perioperative complications in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A new blood draw method in mice. Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on cardiac function and quality of life in atrial fibrillation patients. Esophageal bezoar formation: case report and review of the literature. Establishment and evaluation of a rat model of cervical spondylosis with Yin deficiency syndrome. Expression of Serum Ferritin, Human neutrophil lipocalin, Procalcitonin, and inflammatory factors in children with Kawasaki disease and their relationship to coronary artery lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1