Predictive value of physiological capacity and surgical stress scores for perioperative complications in radical resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/JZKO9876
Yue Li, Beibei Wang, LongKit Tsang, Meng Zou, Linchong Yu, Shijun Xia, Wenjiang Wu
{"title":"Predictive value of physiological capacity and surgical stress scores for perioperative complications in radical resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.","authors":"Yue Li, Beibei Wang, LongKit Tsang, Meng Zou, Linchong Yu, Shijun Xia, Wenjiang Wu","doi":"10.62347/JZKO9876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the predictive value of physiological capacity and surgical stress scores for perioperative complications in radical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was performed from October 2021 to October 2023 at a single center, involving patients scheduled for radical resection of CRC. Patients were divided into groups with and without perioperative complications, and a propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential bias from clinical confounding variables. General patient data, including demographic information, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, surgical parameters, postoperative recovery, and Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scores, were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, factors such as age, diabetes, pulmonary disease, heart disease, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade remained significant predictors for complications (P < 0.05). Prolonged operation, increased blood loss, specific surgery types, and emergent surgeries were linked to a higher risk of perioperative complications (all P < 0.05). Patients with complications experienced longer postoperative hospital stays, increased adjuvant chemotherapy use, and lower quality of life scores (all P < 0.05). Perioperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), and composite risk score (CRS) were positively correlated with the incidence of perioperative complications (all P < 0.001). The AUC values for PRS, SSS, and CRS were 0.848, 0.854, and 0.882 respectively, indicating moderate to high predictive value for perioperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiological capacity and surgical stress scores, age, comorbidities, surgical parameters, postoperative recovery, and the E-PASS scores emerged as key predictive factors for perioperative complications in radical resection for CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 1","pages":"254-266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JZKO9876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the predictive value of physiological capacity and surgical stress scores for perioperative complications in radical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed from October 2021 to October 2023 at a single center, involving patients scheduled for radical resection of CRC. Patients were divided into groups with and without perioperative complications, and a propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential bias from clinical confounding variables. General patient data, including demographic information, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, surgical parameters, postoperative recovery, and Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scores, were collected and analyzed.

Results: After propensity score matching, factors such as age, diabetes, pulmonary disease, heart disease, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade remained significant predictors for complications (P < 0.05). Prolonged operation, increased blood loss, specific surgery types, and emergent surgeries were linked to a higher risk of perioperative complications (all P < 0.05). Patients with complications experienced longer postoperative hospital stays, increased adjuvant chemotherapy use, and lower quality of life scores (all P < 0.05). Perioperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), and composite risk score (CRS) were positively correlated with the incidence of perioperative complications (all P < 0.001). The AUC values for PRS, SSS, and CRS were 0.848, 0.854, and 0.882 respectively, indicating moderate to high predictive value for perioperative complications.

Conclusion: Physiological capacity and surgical stress scores, age, comorbidities, surgical parameters, postoperative recovery, and the E-PASS scores emerged as key predictive factors for perioperative complications in radical resection for CRC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生理能力和手术应激评分对结直肠癌根治术围手术期并发症的预测价值:倾向匹配分析。
目的:探讨生理能力和手术应激评分对结直肠癌根治术围手术期并发症的预测价值。方法:于2021年10月至2023年10月在单中心进行回顾性病例对照研究,纳入计划根治性CRC切除术的患者。将患者分为有围手术期并发症组和无围手术期并发症组,并进行倾向评分匹配,以尽量减少临床混杂变量的潜在偏倚。收集并分析患者的一般资料,包括人口统计学信息、合并症、肿瘤特征、手术参数、术后恢复情况、生理能力和手术应激评估(E-PASS)评分。结果:倾向评分匹配后,年龄、糖尿病、肺病、心脏病、美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分级等因素仍是并发症的显著预测因子(P < 0.05)。手术时间延长、出血量增加、特定手术类型和紧急手术与围手术期并发症风险增加相关(均P < 0.05)。并发症患者术后住院时间更长,辅助化疗使用增加,生活质量评分较低(均P < 0.05)。围手术期危险评分(PRS)、手术应激评分(SSS)、综合危险评分(CRS)与围手术期并发症发生率呈正相关(均P < 0.001)。PRS、SSS、CRS的AUC值分别为0.848、0.854、0.882,对围手术期并发症有中高的预测价值。结论:生理能力和手术应激评分、年龄、合并症、手术参数、术后恢复和E-PASS评分是预测结直肠癌根治术围手术期并发症的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Construction of an auxiliary diagnostic model for secondary pulmonary bacterial infection in influenza based on routine detection indicators. Differential impact of hemiplegia severity stratification on post-hemiarthroplasty dislocation in elderly intertrochanteric fracture patients. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy and safety between ciprofol and propofol in elderly patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. Diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion using thoracoscopy combined with confocal endomicroscopy: a case report. Construction and validation of a multicenter predictive model for neonatal hypoglycemia risk in infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1