Evaluating a collaborative paediatric eye-care model between optometry and ophthalmology: a clinical audit.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Optometry Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1080/08164622.2025.2460623
Andrew Huhtanen, Anu Mathew, Catherine Lewis, Tim Martin, Marianne Piano, Flora Hui
{"title":"Evaluating a collaborative paediatric eye-care model between optometry and ophthalmology: a clinical audit.","authors":"Andrew Huhtanen, Anu Mathew, Catherine Lewis, Tim Martin, Marianne Piano, Flora Hui","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2025.2460623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Collaborative care models between optometry and ophthalmology can be a safe and viable way to improve patient access to paediatric eye-care services and reduce hospital paediatric load.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Long waiting lists exist for paediatric ophthalmology services Australia-wide, yet some patients who are referred to the hospital may not require hospital-based treatment and instead can be seen in primary care. This audit assessed the safety and standard of care provided in a paediatric collaborative care model between a student-led university optometry clinic and a public ophthalmology clinic. Supervising optometrists in the optometry clinic were experienced in the care of paediatric patients. Collaborative care was provided for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, craniosynostosis (without strabismus/amblyopia), nasolacrimal duct obstruction or chalazion, following a co-developed care protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcome data (throughput, re-referrals, waiting list removals) were collected through both clinics. A retrospective case note audit (randomised record selection across the four included conditions) was undertaken, assessing percentage compliance against the co-developed care model protocol. Patient satisfaction with the collaborative care clinic was assessed by patient reported experience survey for clinic attendees in a one-month period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifty-seven of 169 children offered the care pathway received care through the collaborative model, with 209 patients being removed or prevented from being added to the Royal Children's Hospital Ophthalmology waiting list. Collaborative care protocol compliance was 95%. Twenty-nine children were re-referred for ophthalmological intervention. Parents/guardians of 11 children completed the survey, reporting 100% satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborative care between hospital-based ophthalmology and university-based optometry can be effectively implemented in a student-led clinic, resulting in reduced hospital wait times, high clinician adherence to protocols and high family satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"102-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2025.2460623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical relevance: Collaborative care models between optometry and ophthalmology can be a safe and viable way to improve patient access to paediatric eye-care services and reduce hospital paediatric load.

Background: Long waiting lists exist for paediatric ophthalmology services Australia-wide, yet some patients who are referred to the hospital may not require hospital-based treatment and instead can be seen in primary care. This audit assessed the safety and standard of care provided in a paediatric collaborative care model between a student-led university optometry clinic and a public ophthalmology clinic. Supervising optometrists in the optometry clinic were experienced in the care of paediatric patients. Collaborative care was provided for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, craniosynostosis (without strabismus/amblyopia), nasolacrimal duct obstruction or chalazion, following a co-developed care protocol.

Methods: Outcome data (throughput, re-referrals, waiting list removals) were collected through both clinics. A retrospective case note audit (randomised record selection across the four included conditions) was undertaken, assessing percentage compliance against the co-developed care model protocol. Patient satisfaction with the collaborative care clinic was assessed by patient reported experience survey for clinic attendees in a one-month period.

Results: One hundred and fifty-seven of 169 children offered the care pathway received care through the collaborative model, with 209 patients being removed or prevented from being added to the Royal Children's Hospital Ophthalmology waiting list. Collaborative care protocol compliance was 95%. Twenty-nine children were re-referred for ophthalmological intervention. Parents/guardians of 11 children completed the survey, reporting 100% satisfaction.

Conclusions: Collaborative care between hospital-based ophthalmology and university-based optometry can be effectively implemented in a student-led clinic, resulting in reduced hospital wait times, high clinician adherence to protocols and high family satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估验光和眼科之间的合作儿科眼保健模式:临床审计。
临床相关性:验光和眼科之间的协作护理模式可以是一种安全可行的方式,以改善患者获得儿科眼保健服务和减少医院儿科负荷。背景:在澳大利亚范围内,儿童眼科服务的等待名单很长,但一些转介到医院的患者可能不需要医院治疗,而是可以在初级保健中看到。本次审计评估了学生主导的大学验光诊所和公立眼科诊所之间的儿科合作护理模式的安全性和护理标准。验光诊所的验光师在治疗儿科病人方面经验丰富。根据共同制定的护理方案,为患有幼年特发性关节炎、颅缝闭闭(无斜视/弱视)、鼻泪管阻塞或松弛症的儿童提供协作护理。方法:通过两家诊所收集结果数据(吞吐量、转诊、候诊名单删除)。进行回顾性病例记录审核(随机选择四种纳入条件的记录),评估共同开发的护理模式协议的依从性百分比。在一个月的时间里,通过对参加门诊的患者报告体验调查来评估患者对合作护理诊所的满意度。结果:169名提供护理途径的儿童中有157名通过协作模式得到了护理,209名患者被移出或被阻止加入皇家儿童医院眼科等候名单。协作护理方案的依从性为95%。29例患儿再次接受眼科干预。11名儿童的家长/监护人完成了调查,满意度为100%。结论:在学生主导的诊所中,可以有效地实施医院眼科和大学验光的协同护理,减少了医院候诊时间,提高了临床医生对方案的依从性,提高了家庭满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
期刊最新文献
Re: Impact of digital versus faxed e-referrals on triage decisions in a medical retina clinic. Safety and ocular health with an orthokeratology lens in Chinese myopes: a retrospective, multicentre study. Efficacy of repeated red-light laser therapy for myopia control in Australian children: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Reflective practice in optometry education. Re: 'The effect of botulinum toxin A on dry eye disease and syndromes'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1