Evaluating a collaborative paediatric eye-care model between optometry and ophthalmology: a clinical audit.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Optometry Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1080/08164622.2025.2460623
Andrew Huhtanen, Anu Mathew, Catherine Lewis, Tim Martin, Marianne Piano, Flora Hui
{"title":"Evaluating a collaborative paediatric eye-care model between optometry and ophthalmology: a clinical audit.","authors":"Andrew Huhtanen, Anu Mathew, Catherine Lewis, Tim Martin, Marianne Piano, Flora Hui","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2025.2460623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Collaborative care models between optometry and ophthalmology can be a safe and viable way to improve patient access to paediatric eye-care services and reduce hospital paediatric load.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Long waiting lists exist for paediatric ophthalmology services Australia-wide, yet some patients who are referred to the hospital may not require hospital-based treatment and instead can be seen in primary care. This audit assessed the safety and standard of care provided in a paediatric collaborative care model between a student-led university optometry clinic and a public ophthalmology clinic. Supervising optometrists in the optometry clinic were experienced in the care of paediatric patients. Collaborative care was provided for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, craniosynostosis (without strabismus/amblyopia), nasolacrimal duct obstruction or chalazion, following a co-developed care protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcome data (throughput, re-referrals, waiting list removals) were collected through both clinics. A retrospective case note audit (randomised record selection across the four included conditions) was undertaken, assessing percentage compliance against the co-developed care model protocol. Patient satisfaction with the collaborative care clinic was assessed by patient reported experience survey for clinic attendees in a one-month period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifty-seven of 169 children offered the care pathway received care through the collaborative model, with 209 patients being removed or prevented from being added to the Royal Children's Hospital Ophthalmology waiting list. Collaborative care protocol compliance was 95%. Twenty-nine children were re-referred for ophthalmological intervention. Parents/guardians of 11 children completed the survey, reporting 100% satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborative care between hospital-based ophthalmology and university-based optometry can be effectively implemented in a student-led clinic, resulting in reduced hospital wait times, high clinician adherence to protocols and high family satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2025.2460623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical relevance: Collaborative care models between optometry and ophthalmology can be a safe and viable way to improve patient access to paediatric eye-care services and reduce hospital paediatric load.

Background: Long waiting lists exist for paediatric ophthalmology services Australia-wide, yet some patients who are referred to the hospital may not require hospital-based treatment and instead can be seen in primary care. This audit assessed the safety and standard of care provided in a paediatric collaborative care model between a student-led university optometry clinic and a public ophthalmology clinic. Supervising optometrists in the optometry clinic were experienced in the care of paediatric patients. Collaborative care was provided for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, craniosynostosis (without strabismus/amblyopia), nasolacrimal duct obstruction or chalazion, following a co-developed care protocol.

Methods: Outcome data (throughput, re-referrals, waiting list removals) were collected through both clinics. A retrospective case note audit (randomised record selection across the four included conditions) was undertaken, assessing percentage compliance against the co-developed care model protocol. Patient satisfaction with the collaborative care clinic was assessed by patient reported experience survey for clinic attendees in a one-month period.

Results: One hundred and fifty-seven of 169 children offered the care pathway received care through the collaborative model, with 209 patients being removed or prevented from being added to the Royal Children's Hospital Ophthalmology waiting list. Collaborative care protocol compliance was 95%. Twenty-nine children were re-referred for ophthalmological intervention. Parents/guardians of 11 children completed the survey, reporting 100% satisfaction.

Conclusions: Collaborative care between hospital-based ophthalmology and university-based optometry can be effectively implemented in a student-led clinic, resulting in reduced hospital wait times, high clinician adherence to protocols and high family satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
期刊最新文献
Low-luminance visual acuity and low-luminance deficit: optimising measurement and analysis. Ocular allergy and quality of life in a regional Australian optometry practice. Optical coherence tomography and pentacam imaging of concurrent keratoconus and granular corneal dystrophy. Evaluating ocular health in retinal gene therapies. Advancing optometric education through peer-reviewed publication: innovations and insights for the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1