Identification and characteristics of distressed patients with coronary heart disease and insufficiently controlled medical risk factors: baseline findings and sex differences from the multicenter TEACH trial.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494839
Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, Monika Sadlonova, Ingrid Becker, Kristina Bersch, Franziska Geiser, Martin Hellmich, Ingrid Kindermann, Matthias Michal, Mariel Nöhre, Astrid Petersmann, Rolf Wachter, Birgit Herbeck Belnap, Christian Albus
{"title":"Identification and characteristics of distressed patients with coronary heart disease and insufficiently controlled medical risk factors: baseline findings and sex differences from the multicenter TEACH trial.","authors":"Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, Monika Sadlonova, Ingrid Becker, Kristina Bersch, Franziska Geiser, Martin Hellmich, Ingrid Kindermann, Matthias Michal, Mariel Nöhre, Astrid Petersmann, Rolf Wachter, Birgit Herbeck Belnap, Christian Albus","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical risk factors and psychological distress are important targets for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). The multicenter randomized controlled TEACH study is the first trial testing a blended collaborative care (BCC) intervention vs. usual care in a cohort of only patients with CHD. The current manuscript analyzes the availability of distressed CHD patients for a BCC intervention trial and the baseline risk profile of the randomized cohort, especially focusing on sex differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalized CHD patients with positive HADS and/or PSS-4 screening were rescreened three months later and those still distressed were offered participation in the RCT if they had insufficiently controlled medical risk factors (smoking, physical inactivity, elevated blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and/or HbA1c). The current manuscript describes the TEACH screening process and presents baseline data of the randomized cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,785 screened patients, 457 patients with persistent distress and insufficiently controlled risk factors were randomized. Older age and lower distress but not sex independently predicted dropout before randomization. In the randomized cohort (mean age 62.9 ± 9.5 years, 77.4% men), women were older than men (p=0.025), more likely to be retired (52.4% vs. 38.6%; p=0.012) and to live without a partner (48.6% vs. 24.8%, p<0.001). Compared to men, they had lower diastolic blood pressure (p=0.003) but higher rates of physical inactivity (56.0% vs. 41.8%; p=0.012) and positive family history of premature atherosclerotic disease (45.7% vs. 29.8%; p=0.009). They also had a lower rate of previous coronary bypass surgery (21.0% vs. 39.2%, p<0.001). A mental disorder had been diagnosed in 54% of all randomized patients and 42% had previously received mental health treatment, both reported substantially more frequently by women than men (both p<0.001). Satisfaction with care before the trial did not differ by sex but was far lower for psychosocial care than for treatment of heart disease (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>TEACH enrolled a patient sample with persisting distress and a typical risk factor profile. Women differed from men in relevant aspects of their RF profiles and mental health and should receive special attention in future analyses and treatment planning for patients with CHD.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00020824, identifier DRKS00020824.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1494839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494839","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical risk factors and psychological distress are important targets for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). The multicenter randomized controlled TEACH study is the first trial testing a blended collaborative care (BCC) intervention vs. usual care in a cohort of only patients with CHD. The current manuscript analyzes the availability of distressed CHD patients for a BCC intervention trial and the baseline risk profile of the randomized cohort, especially focusing on sex differences.

Methods: Hospitalized CHD patients with positive HADS and/or PSS-4 screening were rescreened three months later and those still distressed were offered participation in the RCT if they had insufficiently controlled medical risk factors (smoking, physical inactivity, elevated blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and/or HbA1c). The current manuscript describes the TEACH screening process and presents baseline data of the randomized cohort.

Results: Of 2,785 screened patients, 457 patients with persistent distress and insufficiently controlled risk factors were randomized. Older age and lower distress but not sex independently predicted dropout before randomization. In the randomized cohort (mean age 62.9 ± 9.5 years, 77.4% men), women were older than men (p=0.025), more likely to be retired (52.4% vs. 38.6%; p=0.012) and to live without a partner (48.6% vs. 24.8%, p<0.001). Compared to men, they had lower diastolic blood pressure (p=0.003) but higher rates of physical inactivity (56.0% vs. 41.8%; p=0.012) and positive family history of premature atherosclerotic disease (45.7% vs. 29.8%; p=0.009). They also had a lower rate of previous coronary bypass surgery (21.0% vs. 39.2%, p<0.001). A mental disorder had been diagnosed in 54% of all randomized patients and 42% had previously received mental health treatment, both reported substantially more frequently by women than men (both p<0.001). Satisfaction with care before the trial did not differ by sex but was far lower for psychosocial care than for treatment of heart disease (p<0.001).

Discussion: TEACH enrolled a patient sample with persisting distress and a typical risk factor profile. Women differed from men in relevant aspects of their RF profiles and mental health and should receive special attention in future analyses and treatment planning for patients with CHD.

Clinical trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00020824, identifier DRKS00020824.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠心病患者的识别和特征以及不充分控制的医疗危险因素:多中心TEACH试验的基线结果和性别差异
医学危险因素和心理困扰是冠心病(CHD)二级预防的重要目标。多中心随机对照TEACH研究是首个在冠心病患者队列中测试混合协作治疗(BCC)干预与常规治疗的试验。目前的论文分析了危重冠心病患者在BCC干预试验中的可用性,以及随机队列的基线风险概况,特别关注性别差异。方法:HADS和/或PSS-4筛查阳性的住院冠心病患者在三个月后重新筛查,如果他们的医疗危险因素(吸烟、缺乏运动、血压升高、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和/或HbA1c)控制不足,仍有症状的患者可以参加随机对照试验。目前的手稿描述了TEACH筛选过程,并提供了随机队列的基线数据。结果:在2785例筛查患者中,457例持续窘迫且危险因素控制不充分的患者被随机化。在随机分组之前,年龄和抑郁程度较低而非性别独立地预测了辍学。在随机队列中(平均年龄62.9±9.5岁,男性77.4%),女性比男性年龄大(p=0.025),更容易退休(52.4%比38.6%;p=0.012)和无伴侣生活(48.6% vs. 24.8%, p)讨论:TEACH招募了一组持续困扰且具有典型风险因素的患者样本。女性在射频谱和心理健康的相关方面与男性不同,在未来冠心病患者的分析和治疗计划中应得到特别关注。临床试验注册:德国临床试验注册,https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00020824,标识符DRKS00020824。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Affective temperament profiles in patients with herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: a comparative analysis using TEMPS-A scale. Correction: Gender differences in gut microbiome composition between schizophrenia patients with normal body weight and central obesity. "We have to keep moving": perspectives on the challenges and opportunities in providing mental health services for people on the move in Latin America. Case Report: Four cases for cariprazine and alcohol use disorder. Current status of coping with insomnia among community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and insomnia: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1