Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC - B and - C: an Italian multicentric analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hpb Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2025.01.009
Gianluca Cassese, Mariano C Giglio, Alessandro Vitale, Andrea Lauterio, Matteo Serenari, Federica Cipriani, Francesco Ardito, Pasquale Perri, Daniele Nicolini, Giulio Di Gioia, Andrea Pierluigi Fontana, Quirino Lai, Simone Conci, Luca Fumagalli, Maurizio Iaria, Mattia Garancini, Sarah Molfino, Matteo Zanello, Giuliano La Barba, Maria Conticchio, Paola Germani, Simone Famularo, Maurizio Romano, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Michela De Angelis, Albert Troci, Andrea Belli, Francesco Izzo, Michele Crespi, Luigi Boccia, Mohamed Abu Hilal, Giacomo Zanus, Guido Torzilli, Paola Tarchi, Riccardo Memeo, Giorgio Ercolani, Elio Jovine, Gianluca Baiocchi, Fabrizio Romano, Raffaele Della Valle, Marco Chiarelli, Andrea Ruzzenente, Massimo Rossi, Alessandro Ferrero, Marcello Maestri, Marco Vivarelli, Gian Luca Grazi, Felice Giuliante, Luca Aldrighetti, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Umberto Cillo, Roberto I Troisi
{"title":"Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC - B and - C: an Italian multicentric analysis.","authors":"Gianluca Cassese, Mariano C Giglio, Alessandro Vitale, Andrea Lauterio, Matteo Serenari, Federica Cipriani, Francesco Ardito, Pasquale Perri, Daniele Nicolini, Giulio Di Gioia, Andrea Pierluigi Fontana, Quirino Lai, Simone Conci, Luca Fumagalli, Maurizio Iaria, Mattia Garancini, Sarah Molfino, Matteo Zanello, Giuliano La Barba, Maria Conticchio, Paola Germani, Simone Famularo, Maurizio Romano, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Michela De Angelis, Albert Troci, Andrea Belli, Francesco Izzo, Michele Crespi, Luigi Boccia, Mohamed Abu Hilal, Giacomo Zanus, Guido Torzilli, Paola Tarchi, Riccardo Memeo, Giorgio Ercolani, Elio Jovine, Gianluca Baiocchi, Fabrizio Romano, Raffaele Della Valle, Marco Chiarelli, Andrea Ruzzenente, Massimo Rossi, Alessandro Ferrero, Marcello Maestri, Marco Vivarelli, Gian Luca Grazi, Felice Giuliante, Luca Aldrighetti, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Umberto Cillo, Roberto I Troisi","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent papers report significant survival gain after liver resection in BCLC-B and -C HCC patients. The results of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in such patients have not been widely investigated so far.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data regarding patients undergoing MILS or open liver resection (OLR) for HCC staged BCLC -B and -C were extracted from the HERCOLES database. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was adopted to balance the confounders. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint including post-hepatectomy liver failure, severe postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>627 patients were included (459 undergoing OLR and 168 receiving MILS). After IPTW, no difference was found in the composite endpoint between MILS and OLR (OR 0.86 [95%CI 0.46-1-60]; p = 0.62). MILS reduced the risk of receiving intra-operative transfusions (OR 0.28 [95%CI 0.13-0.58]; p < 0.001) and of developing postoperative ascites (OR 0.56 [95%CI 0,32-0,98]; p = 0.039), with reduced length of stay (OR 0.82 [95%CI 0.66-1.01]; p = 0.045). The survival analysis showed no differences between MILS and OLR for both OS (p = 0.13) and DFS (p = 0.491).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MILS was shown to be safe and feasible for selected non-metastatic HCC patients staged BCLC B and C, reducing the risk of perioperative transfusions and postoperative ascites, and shortening the length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.01.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent papers report significant survival gain after liver resection in BCLC-B and -C HCC patients. The results of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in such patients have not been widely investigated so far.

Methods: Data regarding patients undergoing MILS or open liver resection (OLR) for HCC staged BCLC -B and -C were extracted from the HERCOLES database. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was adopted to balance the confounders. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint including post-hepatectomy liver failure, severe postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality.

Results: 627 patients were included (459 undergoing OLR and 168 receiving MILS). After IPTW, no difference was found in the composite endpoint between MILS and OLR (OR 0.86 [95%CI 0.46-1-60]; p = 0.62). MILS reduced the risk of receiving intra-operative transfusions (OR 0.28 [95%CI 0.13-0.58]; p < 0.001) and of developing postoperative ascites (OR 0.56 [95%CI 0,32-0,98]; p = 0.039), with reduced length of stay (OR 0.82 [95%CI 0.66-1.01]; p = 0.045). The survival analysis showed no differences between MILS and OLR for both OS (p = 0.13) and DFS (p = 0.491).

Conclusion: MILS was shown to be safe and feasible for selected non-metastatic HCC patients staged BCLC B and C, reducing the risk of perioperative transfusions and postoperative ascites, and shortening the length of stay.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hpb
Hpb GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication. Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice. Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice. HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields. Abstracted and Indexed in: MEDLINE® EMBASE PubMed Science Citation Index Expanded Academic Search (EBSCO) HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).
期刊最新文献
Conference Calendar Contents Percutaneous hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines in treatment-resistant colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study ChatGPT vs. surgeons on pancreatic cancer queries: accuracy & empathy evaluated by patients and experts Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for genetic analysis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1