Immunomodulatory effects of invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Parkinsonism & related disorders Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107314
Evridiki Asimakidou , Christos Sidiropoulos
{"title":"Immunomodulatory effects of invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease","authors":"Evridiki Asimakidou ,&nbsp;Christos Sidiropoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accumulating evidence points to a critical role of the immune system in the neurodegenerative process in Parkinson's disease (PD). This late knowledge has revolutionised our understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying PD and has opened new avenues toward disease-modifying rather than dopamine-replacement therapeutic approaches. When pharmacological treatments fail to adequately alleviate clinical symptoms, brain stimulation techniques are taken into consideration. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) constitutes the most common method for invasive brain stimulation, while the non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms comprise among others repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). How each brain stimulation paradigm interferes with disease pathogenesis still remains elusive. In light of recent evidence supporting the involvement of the immune system in PD, a question that arises is whether brain stimulation techniques have an immunomodulatory potential. Here, we summarize the existing knowledge and provide mechanistic insights that should foster future research. Overall, it appears that DBS and rTMS can modulate both the central and the peripheral component of the immune system and can lead to clinical improvement through immunosuppressive/anti-inflammatory mechanisms. The paucity of evidence for tDCS and tACS precludes any conclusions and highlights the necessity of more mechanistic studies focusing on their immunomodulatory potential, if any. Any pre-clinical findings warrant further clinical validation using human <em>in vivo</em> markers and post-mortem human brain tissue. Unravelling the mechanisms that underpin the beneficial therapeutic effects of brain stimulation in PD patients can contribute substantially to the fine-tuning of the current stimulation protocols and pave the way for more efficient and clinically meaningful neuromodulation paradigms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19970,"journal":{"name":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 107314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353802025000550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accumulating evidence points to a critical role of the immune system in the neurodegenerative process in Parkinson's disease (PD). This late knowledge has revolutionised our understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying PD and has opened new avenues toward disease-modifying rather than dopamine-replacement therapeutic approaches. When pharmacological treatments fail to adequately alleviate clinical symptoms, brain stimulation techniques are taken into consideration. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) constitutes the most common method for invasive brain stimulation, while the non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms comprise among others repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). How each brain stimulation paradigm interferes with disease pathogenesis still remains elusive. In light of recent evidence supporting the involvement of the immune system in PD, a question that arises is whether brain stimulation techniques have an immunomodulatory potential. Here, we summarize the existing knowledge and provide mechanistic insights that should foster future research. Overall, it appears that DBS and rTMS can modulate both the central and the peripheral component of the immune system and can lead to clinical improvement through immunosuppressive/anti-inflammatory mechanisms. The paucity of evidence for tDCS and tACS precludes any conclusions and highlights the necessity of more mechanistic studies focusing on their immunomodulatory potential, if any. Any pre-clinical findings warrant further clinical validation using human in vivo markers and post-mortem human brain tissue. Unravelling the mechanisms that underpin the beneficial therapeutic effects of brain stimulation in PD patients can contribute substantially to the fine-tuning of the current stimulation protocols and pave the way for more efficient and clinically meaningful neuromodulation paradigms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病侵袭性和非侵袭性脑刺激的免疫调节作用。
越来越多的证据表明免疫系统在帕金森病(PD)的神经退行性过程中起着关键作用。这一最新的知识已经彻底改变了我们对帕金森病发病机制的理解,并为疾病改善而不是多巴胺替代治疗方法开辟了新的途径。当药物治疗不能充分缓解临床症状时,可考虑采用脑刺激技术。深部脑刺激(DBS)是侵入性脑刺激最常见的方法,而非侵入性脑刺激范式包括重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、经颅直流刺激(tDCS)和经颅交流电刺激(tACS)。每种脑刺激模式如何干扰疾病发病机制仍然是难以捉摸的。鉴于最近支持免疫系统参与PD的证据,出现的问题是脑刺激技术是否具有免疫调节潜力。在这里,我们总结了现有的知识,并提供了机制的见解,应该促进未来的研究。总的来说,DBS和rTMS似乎可以调节免疫系统的中枢和外周成分,并通过免疫抑制/抗炎机制导致临床改善。tDCS和tACS证据的缺乏排除了任何结论,并强调了更多的机制研究的必要性,重点关注它们的免疫调节潜力,如果有的话。任何临床前的发现都需要进一步的临床验证,使用人类体内标记物和死后的人类脑组织。揭示脑刺激对PD患者有益治疗效果的机制,可以极大地促进当前刺激方案的微调,并为更有效和临床有意义的神经调节范式铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinsonism & related disorders
Parkinsonism & related disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
292
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders publishes the results of basic and clinical research contributing to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of all neurodegenerative syndromes in which Parkinsonism, Essential Tremor or related movement disorders may be a feature. Regular features will include: Review Articles, Point of View articles, Full-length Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports and Letter to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Impaired processing of time-critical language information in Parkinson's disease Longitudinal MRI study of hippocampal subfields Morphometry in early Parkinson's disease Corrigendum to the article: “DYT-AOPEP: A case series from India expanding the clinical and genetic spectrum” [Park. Relat. Disord. 145 (2026) 108227] Bridging the gap: Evaluating a community-based palliative care intervention for underserved patients with Parkinson's disease Electroencephalography microstates detect early cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1