Characterizing and validating 12-month reliable cognitive change in Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease for use in clinical trials.

Dustin B Hammers, Jane Musema, Ani Eloyan, Maryanne Thangarajah, Alexander Taurone, Renaud La Joie, Alexandra Touroutoglou, Prashanthi Vemuri, Joel Kramer, Paul Aisen, Jeffrey L Dage, Kelly N Nudelman, Kala Kirby, Alireza Atri, David Clark, Gregory S Day, Ranjan Duara, Neill R Graff-Radford, Ian Grant, Lawrence S Honig, Erik C B Johnson, David T Jones, Joseph C Masdeu, Mario F Mendez, Kyle Womack, Erik Musiek, Chiadi U Onyike, Meghan Riddle, Emily Rogalski, Steven Salloway, Sharon J Sha, Raymond Scott Turner, Thomas S Wingo, David A Wolk, Maria C Carrillo, Gil D Rabinovici, Bradford C Dickerson, Liana G Apostolova
{"title":"Characterizing and validating 12-month reliable cognitive change in Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease for use in clinical trials.","authors":"Dustin B Hammers, Jane Musema, Ani Eloyan, Maryanne Thangarajah, Alexander Taurone, Renaud La Joie, Alexandra Touroutoglou, Prashanthi Vemuri, Joel Kramer, Paul Aisen, Jeffrey L Dage, Kelly N Nudelman, Kala Kirby, Alireza Atri, David Clark, Gregory S Day, Ranjan Duara, Neill R Graff-Radford, Ian Grant, Lawrence S Honig, Erik C B Johnson, David T Jones, Joseph C Masdeu, Mario F Mendez, Kyle Womack, Erik Musiek, Chiadi U Onyike, Meghan Riddle, Emily Rogalski, Steven Salloway, Sharon J Sha, Raymond Scott Turner, Thomas S Wingo, David A Wolk, Maria C Carrillo, Gil D Rabinovici, Bradford C Dickerson, Liana G Apostolova","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As literature suggests that Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease (EOAD) and late-onset AD may differ in important ways, need exists for randomized clinical trials for treatments tailored to EOAD. Accurately measuring reliable cognitive change in individual patients with EOAD will have great value for these trials.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current study sought to characterize and validate 12-month reliable change from the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) neuropsychological battery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Standardized regression-based (SRB) prediction equations were developed from age-matched cognitively intact participants within LEADS, and applied to clinically impaired participants from LEADS.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants were recruited from outpatient academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were enrolled in LEADS and diagnosed with amyloid-positive EOAD (n = 189) and amyloid-negative early-onset cognitive impairment not related to AD (EOnonAD; n = 43).</p><p><strong>Measurement: </strong>12-month reliable change (Z-scores) was compared between groups across cognitive domain composites, and distributions of individual participant trajectories were examined. Prediction of Z-scores by common AD biomarkers was also considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both EOAD and EOnonAD displayed significantly lower 12-month follow-up scores than were predicted based on SRB equations, with declines more pronounced for EOAD across several domains. AD biomarkers of cerebral β-amyloid, tau, and EOAD-specific atrophy were predictive of 12-month change scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current results support including EOAD patients in longitudinal clinical trials, and generate evidence of validation for using 12-month reliable cognitive change as a clinical outcome metric in clinical trials in EOAD cohorts like LEADS. Doing so will enhance the success of EOAD trials and permit a better understanding of individual responses to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100075"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As literature suggests that Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease (EOAD) and late-onset AD may differ in important ways, need exists for randomized clinical trials for treatments tailored to EOAD. Accurately measuring reliable cognitive change in individual patients with EOAD will have great value for these trials.

Objectives: The current study sought to characterize and validate 12-month reliable change from the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) neuropsychological battery.

Design: Standardized regression-based (SRB) prediction equations were developed from age-matched cognitively intact participants within LEADS, and applied to clinically impaired participants from LEADS.

Setting: Participants were recruited from outpatient academic medical centers.

Participants: Participants were enrolled in LEADS and diagnosed with amyloid-positive EOAD (n = 189) and amyloid-negative early-onset cognitive impairment not related to AD (EOnonAD; n = 43).

Measurement: 12-month reliable change (Z-scores) was compared between groups across cognitive domain composites, and distributions of individual participant trajectories were examined. Prediction of Z-scores by common AD biomarkers was also considered.

Results: Both EOAD and EOnonAD displayed significantly lower 12-month follow-up scores than were predicted based on SRB equations, with declines more pronounced for EOAD across several domains. AD biomarkers of cerebral β-amyloid, tau, and EOAD-specific atrophy were predictive of 12-month change scores.

Conclusions: The current results support including EOAD patients in longitudinal clinical trials, and generate evidence of validation for using 12-month reliable cognitive change as a clinical outcome metric in clinical trials in EOAD cohorts like LEADS. Doing so will enhance the success of EOAD trials and permit a better understanding of individual responses to treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing and validating 12-month reliable cognitive change in Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease for use in clinical trials. Biofluid biomarker changes following treatment with sabirnetug (ACU193) in INTERCEPT-AD, a phase 1 trial in early Alzheimer's disease. Association of dietary diversity, genetic susceptibility, and the risk of incident dementia: A prospective cohort study. Diagnostic and discriminative accuracy of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 for symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in a Chinese cohort. The impact of pre-analytical factors on plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: The ASPREE Healthy Ageing Biobank.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1