The effect of formaldehyde solution in pitfall traps on the probability of catching woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea).

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY ZooKeys Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3897/zookeys.1225.123647
Ivan Hadrián Tuf, Lucie Novotná, Pavel Fryčka
{"title":"The effect of formaldehyde solution in pitfall traps on the probability of catching woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea).","authors":"Ivan Hadrián Tuf, Lucie Novotná, Pavel Fryčka","doi":"10.3897/zookeys.1225.123647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pitfall traps containing a fixative solution are commonly used by ecologists to study ground-dwelling invertebrates. The effect of the solution on the animals being caught is a frequent topic of studies. Our study compares the effect of formaldehyde solution, water, and the random probability of catch simulated by using dry traps. Ninety pitfall traps were placed in a floodplain forest ground: one-third used 4% formaldehyde solution as a fixative, one-third used water, and one-third was left without any liquid to simulate the random probability of a catch. A layer of dry wood chips was used in the dry traps to reduce predation between the caught animals. The traps were placed in the field between April and May 2022 and emptied twice a week. Both the numbers of animals and the species caught were found to be significantly affected by the fixative solution in use. Significantly more woodlice were caught in traps filled with water; these traps also attracted significantly more <i>Porcelliumconspersum</i> and <i>Trachelipusrathkii</i> compared to the dry traps. Average day temperature and the order the traps were checked (i.e. date) had an influence on the animals caught as well. Additional laboratory experiments with <i>Porcellioscaber</i> confirmed that terrestrial isopods avoid formaldehyde pitfall traps more than those with water.</p>","PeriodicalId":24051,"journal":{"name":"ZooKeys","volume":"1225 ","pages":"115-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZooKeys","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1225.123647","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pitfall traps containing a fixative solution are commonly used by ecologists to study ground-dwelling invertebrates. The effect of the solution on the animals being caught is a frequent topic of studies. Our study compares the effect of formaldehyde solution, water, and the random probability of catch simulated by using dry traps. Ninety pitfall traps were placed in a floodplain forest ground: one-third used 4% formaldehyde solution as a fixative, one-third used water, and one-third was left without any liquid to simulate the random probability of a catch. A layer of dry wood chips was used in the dry traps to reduce predation between the caught animals. The traps were placed in the field between April and May 2022 and emptied twice a week. Both the numbers of animals and the species caught were found to be significantly affected by the fixative solution in use. Significantly more woodlice were caught in traps filled with water; these traps also attracted significantly more Porcelliumconspersum and Trachelipusrathkii compared to the dry traps. Average day temperature and the order the traps were checked (i.e. date) had an influence on the animals caught as well. Additional laboratory experiments with Porcellioscaber confirmed that terrestrial isopods avoid formaldehyde pitfall traps more than those with water.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The陷阱中甲醛溶液对捕获木虱概率的影响(等足目,蛇尾目)。
含有固定溶液的陷阱通常被生态学家用来研究陆生无脊椎动物。溶液对被捕获的动物的影响是研究的一个常见话题。我们的研究比较了甲醛溶液、水的效果,以及用干捕集器模拟的随机捕获概率。在洪泛区森林地面上放置了90个陷阱:三分之一使用4%甲醛溶液作为固定剂,三分之一使用水,三分之一不使用任何液体来模拟捕获的随机概率。在干捕兽器中使用了一层干木屑,以减少被捕获动物之间的捕食。这些陷阱于2022年4月至5月期间放置在野外,每周清空两次。发现所使用的固定液对捕获的动物数量和种类都有显著影响。在充满水的陷阱中捕获的木虱明显更多;与干燥捕集器相比,这些捕集器也显著吸引了更多的花瓷和鼠眼。平均日温度和检查陷阱的顺序(即日期)也对捕获的动物有影响。另外用Porcellioscaber进行的实验室实验证实,陆生等足类动物比有水的动物更能避免甲醛陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ZooKeys
ZooKeys 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
400
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ZooKeys is a peer-reviewed, open-access, online and print, rapidly produced journal launched to support free exchange of ideas and information in systematic zoology, phylogeny and biogeography. All papers can be freely copied, downloaded, printed and distributed at no charge. Authors and readers are thus encouraged to post the pdf files of published papers on homepages or elsewhere to expedite distribution. There is no charge for color.
期刊最新文献
The Swedish Thripidae (Thysanoptera) - with additional notes on wetland thrips. Taxonomic notes on the genus Hexanchorus Sharp, 1882 and Heterelmis Sharp, 1882 from Bolivia (Coleoptera, Elmidae). Redescription and neotype designation of Dopasia formosensis (Kishida, 1930) (Squamata, Anguidae) from Taiwan. Partial mitochondrial genome of the enigmatic Bermuda fireworm Odontosyllis enopla Verrill, 1900 (Annelida, Syllidae, Eusyllinae) and its phylogenetic implications. Comparative mitogenomics and phylogenetic implications of Dawkinsia apsara and Dawkinsia denisonii (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1