Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Nursing Students' Knowledge in Critical Care.

Q2 Medicine Clinica Terapeutica Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7417/CT.2025.5172
T Colacci, F Bonavoglia, F Dibattista, V Gargaro, S Taborri, G La Torre
{"title":"Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Nursing Students' Knowledge in Critical Care.","authors":"T Colacci, F Bonavoglia, F Dibattista, V Gargaro, S Taborri, G La Torre","doi":"10.7417/CT.2025.5172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acquiring nursing skills in critical care requires the planning and implementation of carefully structured educational interventions. These interventions must be based on proven teaching methods that support the achievement of the expected educational objectives for students. Integrating traditional classroom teaching with interactive methodologies, such as gamification and role-playing, is essential to enhancing students' knowledge. These knowledge levels need to be measured through structured tools. To validate the questionnaire needed to assess nursing students' knowledge in the critical care area, a feasibility pilot study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A pilot study was carried out, enrolling a total of 30 third-year nursing students from the University of Rome \"La Sapienza\". The questionnaire was administered at two time points: T0 and 48 hours later (T1) in April 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results did not show significant differences in the questionnaire administration at T0 and T1. Based on statistical analysis of the data using Cronbach's alpha, which yielded a value of 0.606, an adequate level of reliability and good internal consistency of the tool was found. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of the tool in assessing the learning of nursing students regarding the care of critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from the statistical analysis of the data allowed for the validation of the administered questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":50686,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Terapeutica","volume":"176 1","pages":"105-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Terapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2025.5172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acquiring nursing skills in critical care requires the planning and implementation of carefully structured educational interventions. These interventions must be based on proven teaching methods that support the achievement of the expected educational objectives for students. Integrating traditional classroom teaching with interactive methodologies, such as gamification and role-playing, is essential to enhancing students' knowledge. These knowledge levels need to be measured through structured tools. To validate the questionnaire needed to assess nursing students' knowledge in the critical care area, a feasibility pilot study was conducted.

Materials and methods: A pilot study was carried out, enrolling a total of 30 third-year nursing students from the University of Rome "La Sapienza". The questionnaire was administered at two time points: T0 and 48 hours later (T1) in April 2024.

Results: The results did not show significant differences in the questionnaire administration at T0 and T1. Based on statistical analysis of the data using Cronbach's alpha, which yielded a value of 0.606, an adequate level of reliability and good internal consistency of the tool was found. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of the tool in assessing the learning of nursing students regarding the care of critically ill patients.

Conclusions: The results from the statistical analysis of the data allowed for the validation of the administered questionnaire.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一份评估护生危重病护理知识的问卷验证。
背景:获得危重病护理技能需要精心组织的教育干预措施的规划和实施。这些干预措施必须基于经过验证的教学方法,以支持实现学生的预期教育目标。将传统的课堂教学与互动方法相结合,如游戏化和角色扮演,对提高学生的知识至关重要。这些知识水平需要通过结构化工具来衡量。为了验证评估护生危重护理知识所需的问卷,本研究进行了可行性初步研究。材料和方法:开展了一项试点研究,共招募了30名来自罗马大学“La Sapienza”的三年级护理专业学生。问卷于2024年4月T0和48小时后(T1)两个时间点进行。结果:T0和T1时问卷给药结果无显著差异。采用Cronbach’s alpha对数据进行统计分析,其值为0.606,表明该工具具有足够的信度和良好的内部一致性。这些发现证明了该工具在评估护理学生对危重病人护理的学习方面的有用性。结论:数据的统计分析结果允许对所管理的问卷进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Terapeutica
Clinica Terapeutica PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Clinica Terapeutica è una rivista di Clinica e Terapia in Medicina e Chirurgia, fondata nel 1951 dal Prof. Mariano Messini (1901-1980), Direttore dell''Istituto di Idrologia Medica dell''Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. La rivista è pubblicata come “periodico bimestrale” dalla Società Editrice Universo, casa editrice fondata nel 1945 dal Comm. Luigi Pellino. La Clinica Terapeutica è indicizzata su MEDLINE, INDEX MEDICUS, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of adherence to play therapy in children with cerebral palsy: a clinical trial. The Efficacy of Hook Plates Around the Elbow: A Stable Fixation. Spontaneous Complete Recovery of Bilateral Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Two Years: A Rare Case Report. The Role of Ki-67 in Predicting Breast Cancer Survival in Indonesia: A Prospective Cohort Study. Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid-Free Multimodal Analgesia Versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1