Getting Inside Closed-Loop Referrals: Exploring the Patient Experience of Finding and Connecting to Social Care With a Community Resource Referral System Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14451
Anthony W. Olson, Nik Allen, Ardem Elmayan, Kim Green, Melissa L. Harry, Jenny Kempfert, Emily Kuenstler, Heath Maki, Sarah Nelson, Mary Rapps, Rose St. John, Salaam Witherspoon, Shawandala Brown, Ashlie Castaldo, Melissa Grimes, Treasure Jenkins, Kennedy Mosher
{"title":"Getting Inside Closed-Loop Referrals: Exploring the Patient Experience of Finding and Connecting to Social Care With a Community Resource Referral System Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach","authors":"Anthony W. Olson,&nbsp;Nik Allen,&nbsp;Ardem Elmayan,&nbsp;Kim Green,&nbsp;Melissa L. Harry,&nbsp;Jenny Kempfert,&nbsp;Emily Kuenstler,&nbsp;Heath Maki,&nbsp;Sarah Nelson,&nbsp;Mary Rapps,&nbsp;Rose St. John,&nbsp;Salaam Witherspoon,&nbsp;Shawandala Brown,&nbsp;Ashlie Castaldo,&nbsp;Melissa Grimes,&nbsp;Treasure Jenkins,&nbsp;Kennedy Mosher","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the experiences of patients who found and/or connected to social care via a community resource referral system named “Resourceful” (linked with FindHelp.org) linked to a health system's electronic health record.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Setting and Design</h3>\n \n <p>The mixed-methods study was co-designed and conducted using community-based participatory processes by a team of researchers at a multi-state health system (Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin) and community members with lived experience addressing unmet social needs. Study participants were individuals referred to, connected to, or delivered social care through Resourceful in the health system's service area. Quantitative surveys were emailed to 780 patients and 38 healthcare workers (HCWs) tied to closed-loop referrals between 8/2022 and 2/2023. Qualitative interview invites were emailed to 19 patient survey respondents wanting to interview, and the five HCWs and 12 community-based organizations (CBOs) involved in their social care experience. Descriptive statistics analyzed sociodemographic and patient experience variables developed via the participatory process. We coded qualitative data using thematic analysis, extracting thematic factors informing survey responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Analytic Sample</h3>\n \n <p>We collected primary data from online surveys and semi-structured phone interviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Usable survey responses from 62 patients and 14 HCWs were analyzed. Most respondents agreed on some level that their experience using Resourceful strengthened patient trust (patients:66%, HCWs:86%), improved communication about what patients need to be healthy (patients:61%, HCWs:57%), provided “helpful help” reducing social care barriers (patients:56%, HCWs:93%), and enhanced person-centeredness (patients:60%, HCWs:79%). Qualitative analysis yielded six thematic factors corresponding to 23 actionable takeaways potentially important for using CRRS to improve the seeker experience of social care: resource/service environment; platform access/usability/utilization; helper integration/coordination/continuity; helpful help; reliable sources/partnerships; responsive relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Differences in the perceptions of patient experiences involving resourceful were observed between patients and HCWs/CBOs. Thematic factors clarified these differences and how to improve patient experiences with closed-loop referrals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"60 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6773.14451","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore the experiences of patients who found and/or connected to social care via a community resource referral system named “Resourceful” (linked with FindHelp.org) linked to a health system's electronic health record.

Study Setting and Design

The mixed-methods study was co-designed and conducted using community-based participatory processes by a team of researchers at a multi-state health system (Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin) and community members with lived experience addressing unmet social needs. Study participants were individuals referred to, connected to, or delivered social care through Resourceful in the health system's service area. Quantitative surveys were emailed to 780 patients and 38 healthcare workers (HCWs) tied to closed-loop referrals between 8/2022 and 2/2023. Qualitative interview invites were emailed to 19 patient survey respondents wanting to interview, and the five HCWs and 12 community-based organizations (CBOs) involved in their social care experience. Descriptive statistics analyzed sociodemographic and patient experience variables developed via the participatory process. We coded qualitative data using thematic analysis, extracting thematic factors informing survey responses.

Data Sources and Analytic Sample

We collected primary data from online surveys and semi-structured phone interviews.

Principal Findings

Usable survey responses from 62 patients and 14 HCWs were analyzed. Most respondents agreed on some level that their experience using Resourceful strengthened patient trust (patients:66%, HCWs:86%), improved communication about what patients need to be healthy (patients:61%, HCWs:57%), provided “helpful help” reducing social care barriers (patients:56%, HCWs:93%), and enhanced person-centeredness (patients:60%, HCWs:79%). Qualitative analysis yielded six thematic factors corresponding to 23 actionable takeaways potentially important for using CRRS to improve the seeker experience of social care: resource/service environment; platform access/usability/utilization; helper integration/coordination/continuity; helpful help; reliable sources/partnerships; responsive relationships.

Conclusions

Differences in the perceptions of patient experiences involving resourceful were observed between patients and HCWs/CBOs. Thematic factors clarified these differences and how to improve patient experiences with closed-loop referrals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进入闭环转诊:探索患者的经验,发现并连接到社会护理与社区资源转诊系统使用基于社区的参与式方法。
目的:探讨通过与卫生系统电子健康记录相关联的名为“Resourceful”的社区资源转诊系统(与FindHelp.org链接)找到和/或连接到社会护理的患者的经历。研究环境和设计:混合方法研究由多州卫生系统(明尼苏达州、北达科他州、威斯康星州)的一组研究人员和具有解决未满足社会需求的生活经验的社区成员共同设计和实施,采用基于社区的参与式过程。研究参与者是通过卫生系统服务区的Resourceful转介、连接或提供社会护理的个人。在2022年8月至2023年2月期间,通过电子邮件向780名患者和38名与闭环转诊相关的医护人员(HCWs)进行了定量调查。定性访谈邀请通过电子邮件发送给19名希望接受访谈的患者调查受访者,以及参与其社会护理体验的5名卫生保健工作者和12名社区组织(cbo)。描述性统计分析了通过参与式过程开发的社会人口学和患者经验变量。我们使用主题分析对定性数据进行编码,提取为调查回答提供信息的主题因素。数据来源和分析样本:我们从在线调查和半结构化电话访谈中收集了主要数据。主要发现:分析了62名患者和14名卫生保健工作者的可用调查回复。大多数受访者在一定程度上同意,他们使用Resourceful的经验增强了患者的信任(患者:66%,卫生保健工作者:86%),改善了关于患者健康需要的沟通(患者:61%,卫生保健工作者:57%),提供了“有益的帮助”,减少了社会护理障碍(患者:56%,卫生保健工作者:93%),并增强了以人为本(患者:60%,卫生保健工作者:79%)。定性分析产生了六个主题因素,对应于23个可操作的要点,这些要点对于使用CRRS改善社会护理寻求者的体验可能很重要:资源/服务环境;平台访问/可用性/利用率;辅助集成/协调/连续性;有用的帮助;可靠的来源/伙伴关系;响应的关系。结论:观察到患者和卫生保健工作者/卫生保健工作者对涉及资源的患者体验的看法存在差异。主题因素澄清了这些差异以及如何通过闭环转诊改善患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Examining the Potential Role of Opioid Settlement Funds in the Face of Impending Federal Budget Reductions for Substance Use Disorders. Mind the Activation Gap: Factors Associated With Low Patient Activation Among Dual-Eligible Versus Medicare-Only Beneficiaries. Identifying Bariatric Surgery Patients With the Most Favorable Cost Outcomes. A Machine Learning Model to Improve Risk Adjustment Accuracy in Medicare. The All-Payer Claims Database After the Gobeille Supreme Court Decision: Assessing the Impact on Fatal Opioid-Related Overdose Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1