Getting Inside Closed-Loop Referrals: Exploring the Patient Experience of Finding and Connecting to Social Care With a Community Resource Referral System Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14451
Anthony W Olson, Nik Allen, Ardem Elmayan, Kim Green, Melissa L Harry, Jenny Kempfert, Emily Kuenstler, Heath Maki, Sarah Nelson, Mary Rapps, Rose St John, Salaam Witherspoon, Shawandala Brown, Ashlie Castaldo, Melissa Grimes, Treasure Jenkins, Kennedy Mosher
{"title":"Getting Inside Closed-Loop Referrals: Exploring the Patient Experience of Finding and Connecting to Social Care With a Community Resource Referral System Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach.","authors":"Anthony W Olson, Nik Allen, Ardem Elmayan, Kim Green, Melissa L Harry, Jenny Kempfert, Emily Kuenstler, Heath Maki, Sarah Nelson, Mary Rapps, Rose St John, Salaam Witherspoon, Shawandala Brown, Ashlie Castaldo, Melissa Grimes, Treasure Jenkins, Kennedy Mosher","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experiences of patients who found and/or connected to social care via a community resource referral system named \"Resourceful\" (linked with FindHelp.org) linked to a health system's electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>The mixed-methods study was co-designed and conducted using community-based participatory processes by a team of researchers at a multi-state health system (Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin) and community members with lived experience addressing unmet social needs. Study participants were individuals referred to, connected to, or delivered social care through Resourceful in the health system's service area. Quantitative surveys were emailed to 780 patients and 38 healthcare workers (HCWs) tied to closed-loop referrals between 8/2022 and 2/2023. Qualitative interview invites were emailed to 19 patient survey respondents wanting to interview, and the five HCWs and 12 community-based organizations (CBOs) involved in their social care experience. Descriptive statistics analyzed sociodemographic and patient experience variables developed via the participatory process. We coded qualitative data using thematic analysis, extracting thematic factors informing survey responses.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We collected primary data from online surveys and semi-structured phone interviews.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Usable survey responses from 62 patients and 14 HCWs were analyzed. Most respondents agreed on some level that their experience using Resourceful strengthened patient trust (patients:66%, HCWs:86%), improved communication about what patients need to be healthy (patients:61%, HCWs:57%), provided \"helpful help\" reducing social care barriers (patients:56%, HCWs:93%), and enhanced person-centeredness (patients:60%, HCWs:79%). Qualitative analysis yielded six thematic factors corresponding to 23 actionable takeaways potentially important for using CRRS to improve the seeker experience of social care: resource/service environment; platform access/usability/utilization; helper integration/coordination/continuity; helpful help; reliable sources/partnerships; responsive relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in the perceptions of patient experiences involving resourceful were observed between patients and HCWs/CBOs. Thematic factors clarified these differences and how to improve patient experiences with closed-loop referrals.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the experiences of patients who found and/or connected to social care via a community resource referral system named "Resourceful" (linked with FindHelp.org) linked to a health system's electronic health record.

Study setting and design: The mixed-methods study was co-designed and conducted using community-based participatory processes by a team of researchers at a multi-state health system (Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin) and community members with lived experience addressing unmet social needs. Study participants were individuals referred to, connected to, or delivered social care through Resourceful in the health system's service area. Quantitative surveys were emailed to 780 patients and 38 healthcare workers (HCWs) tied to closed-loop referrals between 8/2022 and 2/2023. Qualitative interview invites were emailed to 19 patient survey respondents wanting to interview, and the five HCWs and 12 community-based organizations (CBOs) involved in their social care experience. Descriptive statistics analyzed sociodemographic and patient experience variables developed via the participatory process. We coded qualitative data using thematic analysis, extracting thematic factors informing survey responses.

Data sources and analytic sample: We collected primary data from online surveys and semi-structured phone interviews.

Principal findings: Usable survey responses from 62 patients and 14 HCWs were analyzed. Most respondents agreed on some level that their experience using Resourceful strengthened patient trust (patients:66%, HCWs:86%), improved communication about what patients need to be healthy (patients:61%, HCWs:57%), provided "helpful help" reducing social care barriers (patients:56%, HCWs:93%), and enhanced person-centeredness (patients:60%, HCWs:79%). Qualitative analysis yielded six thematic factors corresponding to 23 actionable takeaways potentially important for using CRRS to improve the seeker experience of social care: resource/service environment; platform access/usability/utilization; helper integration/coordination/continuity; helpful help; reliable sources/partnerships; responsive relationships.

Conclusions: Differences in the perceptions of patient experiences involving resourceful were observed between patients and HCWs/CBOs. Thematic factors clarified these differences and how to improve patient experiences with closed-loop referrals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Getting Inside Closed-Loop Referrals: Exploring the Patient Experience of Finding and Connecting to Social Care With a Community Resource Referral System Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach. The Effects of Medicaid Coverage for School-Based Health Services on the Supply of School-Based Healthcare Clinics: Evidence From the "Free Care Rule" Reversal and FQHCs. Criminal Justice, Arrests Data, and Structural Racism Measurement for Health Equity Research: Promises and Pitfalls. The Combined and Comparative Impacts of Financial Incentives Versus Practice Facilitation Implementation Support for Social Risk Screening in Community Health Centers. Identification of Social Risk-Related Referrals in Discrete Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data: Lessons Learned From a Novel Methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1