Comparison of Two Different Sizes of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Particles in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation With Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Radiographic Study
Xiaoru Qin, Yue Xi, Fei Teng, Zhikang Wang, Guoli Yang
{"title":"Comparison of Two Different Sizes of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Particles in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation With Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Radiographic Study","authors":"Xiaoru Qin, Yue Xi, Fei Teng, Zhikang Wang, Guoli Yang","doi":"10.1111/clr.14421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo investigate the radiographic changes of two different particle sizes of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) following lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) with simultaneous implant placement.Materials and MethodsA total of 104 patients with 128 implants receiving LSFE with simultaneous implant placement were included and divided according to the grafted DBBM: 47 using small particle sizes (0.25–1 mm), 57 using large particle sizes (1–2 mm). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken at three points (T0: before surgery, T1: immediate postoperative, T2: 6‐month postoperative). The two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional augmentation parameters, including apical bone height (ABH), endo‐sinus bone gain (ESBG), peri‐implant bone height (PBH), marginal bone loss (MBL), and augmented bone volume (AV) were measured. The differences in augmentation parameters between the small and large particle sizes of DBBM were compared.ResultsAV was 916.76 (657.88–1243.74) mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> at T1 and decreased to 823.73 (583.12–1178.79) mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> at T2, pointing to a relative volume stability of 89.8%. Although ABH did not significantly differ between the two groups at T1 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.379) and T2 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.264), AV, ESBG, and PBH were significantly higher in the large particle group. At the 6‐month follow‐up, the reduction rates in AV (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), ESBG (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.022), and PBH (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004) were lower in the large particle group.ConclusionsThe augmentation outcome decreased after LSFE with simultaneous implant placement at the 6‐month follow‐up. Using the large particle size of DBBM improved the augmentation stability.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesTo investigate the radiographic changes of two different particle sizes of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) following lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) with simultaneous implant placement.Materials and MethodsA total of 104 patients with 128 implants receiving LSFE with simultaneous implant placement were included and divided according to the grafted DBBM: 47 using small particle sizes (0.25–1 mm), 57 using large particle sizes (1–2 mm). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken at three points (T0: before surgery, T1: immediate postoperative, T2: 6‐month postoperative). The two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional augmentation parameters, including apical bone height (ABH), endo‐sinus bone gain (ESBG), peri‐implant bone height (PBH), marginal bone loss (MBL), and augmented bone volume (AV) were measured. The differences in augmentation parameters between the small and large particle sizes of DBBM were compared.ResultsAV was 916.76 (657.88–1243.74) mm3 at T1 and decreased to 823.73 (583.12–1178.79) mm3 at T2, pointing to a relative volume stability of 89.8%. Although ABH did not significantly differ between the two groups at T1 (p = 0.379) and T2 (p = 0.264), AV, ESBG, and PBH were significantly higher in the large particle group. At the 6‐month follow‐up, the reduction rates in AV (p < 0.001), ESBG (p = 0.022), and PBH (p = 0.004) were lower in the large particle group.ConclusionsThe augmentation outcome decreased after LSFE with simultaneous implant placement at the 6‐month follow‐up. Using the large particle size of DBBM improved the augmentation stability.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.