Robust Prediction of Water Arsenic Levels Downstream of Gold Mines Affected by Acid Mine Drainage Using Hybrid Ensemble Machine Learning and Soft Computing
Ezzeddin Bakhtavar, Shahab Hosseini, Haroon R. Mian, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq
{"title":"Robust Prediction of Water Arsenic Levels Downstream of Gold Mines Affected by Acid Mine Drainage Using Hybrid Ensemble Machine Learning and Soft Computing","authors":"Ezzeddin Bakhtavar, Shahab Hosseini, Haroon R. Mian, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water pollution from hazardous materials, particularly arsenic, downstream of gold mines poses severe environmental and health risks. This study employs a systematic approach to predict water arsenic (WA) levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage. WA data from the affected region were collected and preprocessed to standardize the dataset and mitigate overfitting risks. Advanced ensemble machine learning methods, particularly Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), with two models developed: a manually-adjusted version and an optimization-based model using Jellyfish Search Optimizer (JSO). The performance of the LightGBM-JSO model was evaluated against a range of ensemble learning models, metaheuristic algorithms, and artificial intelligence techniques. Models were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE), mean relative error (MRE), scattered index (SI), ρ, and the Final Rating (FRa) methodology. The LightGBM-JSO outperformed other models, achieving a training phase MAE of 148.763, MAPE of 62.081, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.996, RMSE of 183.692, WMAPE of 0.08, SI of 0.097, ρ of 0.048, and MRE of -0.379. In the testing phase, it had an MAE of 19.496, MAPE of 10.686, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.990, RMSE of 37.386, WMAPE of 0.136, SI of 0.241, ρ of 0.121, and MRE of 0.03. Uncertainty analysis confirmed the model's reliability with a prediction interval of ±0.05<!-- --> <!-- -->mg/L for arsenic concentration. This study provides evidence to support environmental management decisions, providing valuable insights for regulatory bodies, policymakers, and stakeholders to support sustainable mining practices.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137665","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water pollution from hazardous materials, particularly arsenic, downstream of gold mines poses severe environmental and health risks. This study employs a systematic approach to predict water arsenic (WA) levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage. WA data from the affected region were collected and preprocessed to standardize the dataset and mitigate overfitting risks. Advanced ensemble machine learning methods, particularly Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), with two models developed: a manually-adjusted version and an optimization-based model using Jellyfish Search Optimizer (JSO). The performance of the LightGBM-JSO model was evaluated against a range of ensemble learning models, metaheuristic algorithms, and artificial intelligence techniques. Models were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE), mean relative error (MRE), scattered index (SI), ρ, and the Final Rating (FRa) methodology. The LightGBM-JSO outperformed other models, achieving a training phase MAE of 148.763, MAPE of 62.081, R2 of 0.996, RMSE of 183.692, WMAPE of 0.08, SI of 0.097, ρ of 0.048, and MRE of -0.379. In the testing phase, it had an MAE of 19.496, MAPE of 10.686, R2 of 0.990, RMSE of 37.386, WMAPE of 0.136, SI of 0.241, ρ of 0.121, and MRE of 0.03. Uncertainty analysis confirmed the model's reliability with a prediction interval of ±0.05 mg/L for arsenic concentration. This study provides evidence to support environmental management decisions, providing valuable insights for regulatory bodies, policymakers, and stakeholders to support sustainable mining practices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.