Robust Prediction of Water Arsenic Levels Downstream of Gold Mines Affected by Acid Mine Drainage Using Hybrid Ensemble Machine Learning and Soft Computing

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Hazardous Materials Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137665
Ezzeddin Bakhtavar, Shahab Hosseini, Haroon R. Mian, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq
{"title":"Robust Prediction of Water Arsenic Levels Downstream of Gold Mines Affected by Acid Mine Drainage Using Hybrid Ensemble Machine Learning and Soft Computing","authors":"Ezzeddin Bakhtavar, Shahab Hosseini, Haroon R. Mian, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water pollution from hazardous materials, particularly arsenic, downstream of gold mines poses severe environmental and health risks. This study employs a systematic approach to predict water arsenic (WA) levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage. WA data from the affected region were collected and preprocessed to standardize the dataset and mitigate overfitting risks. Advanced ensemble machine learning methods, particularly Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), with two models developed: a manually-adjusted version and an optimization-based model using Jellyfish Search Optimizer (JSO). The performance of the LightGBM-JSO model was evaluated against a range of ensemble learning models, metaheuristic algorithms, and artificial intelligence techniques. Models were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE), mean relative error (MRE), scattered index (SI), ρ, and the Final Rating (FRa) methodology. The LightGBM-JSO outperformed other models, achieving a training phase MAE of 148.763, MAPE of 62.081, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.996, RMSE of 183.692, WMAPE of 0.08, SI of 0.097, ρ of 0.048, and MRE of -0.379. In the testing phase, it had an MAE of 19.496, MAPE of 10.686, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.990, RMSE of 37.386, WMAPE of 0.136, SI of 0.241, ρ of 0.121, and MRE of 0.03. Uncertainty analysis confirmed the model's reliability with a prediction interval of ±0.05<!-- --> <!-- -->mg/L for arsenic concentration. This study provides evidence to support environmental management decisions, providing valuable insights for regulatory bodies, policymakers, and stakeholders to support sustainable mining practices.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137665","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water pollution from hazardous materials, particularly arsenic, downstream of gold mines poses severe environmental and health risks. This study employs a systematic approach to predict water arsenic (WA) levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage. WA data from the affected region were collected and preprocessed to standardize the dataset and mitigate overfitting risks. Advanced ensemble machine learning methods, particularly Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), with two models developed: a manually-adjusted version and an optimization-based model using Jellyfish Search Optimizer (JSO). The performance of the LightGBM-JSO model was evaluated against a range of ensemble learning models, metaheuristic algorithms, and artificial intelligence techniques. Models were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE), mean relative error (MRE), scattered index (SI), ρ, and the Final Rating (FRa) methodology. The LightGBM-JSO outperformed other models, achieving a training phase MAE of 148.763, MAPE of 62.081, R2 of 0.996, RMSE of 183.692, WMAPE of 0.08, SI of 0.097, ρ of 0.048, and MRE of -0.379. In the testing phase, it had an MAE of 19.496, MAPE of 10.686, R2 of 0.990, RMSE of 37.386, WMAPE of 0.136, SI of 0.241, ρ of 0.121, and MRE of 0.03. Uncertainty analysis confirmed the model's reliability with a prediction interval of ±0.05 mg/L for arsenic concentration. This study provides evidence to support environmental management decisions, providing valuable insights for regulatory bodies, policymakers, and stakeholders to support sustainable mining practices.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于混合集成机器学习和软计算的酸性矿井排水对下游金矿水砷水平的鲁棒预测
金矿下游有害物质,特别是砷造成的水污染构成严重的环境和健康风险。本研究采用系统的方法预测受酸性矿井排水影响的金矿下游水砷(WA)水平。收集来自受影响地区的WA数据并进行预处理,以标准化数据集并降低过拟合风险。先进的集成机器学习方法,特别是光梯度增强机(LightGBM),开发了两个模型:手动调整版本和使用水母搜索优化器(JSO)的基于优化的模型。LightGBM-JSO模型的性能根据一系列集成学习模型、元启发式算法和人工智能技术进行了评估。采用平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、决定系数(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)、加权平均绝对百分比误差(WMAPE)、平均相对误差(MRE)、分散指数(SI)、ρ和最终评级(FRa)方法对模型进行评价。LightGBM-JSO的训练阶段MAE为148.763,MAPE为62.081,R2为0.996,RMSE为183.692,WMAPE为0.08,SI为0.097,ρ为0.048,MRE为-0.379。检验阶段的MAE为19.496,MAPE为10.686,R2为0.990,RMSE为37.386,WMAPE为0.136,SI为0.241,ρ为0.121,MRE为0.03。不确定度分析证实了模型的可靠性,预测区间为±0.05 mg/L。本研究为支持环境管理决策提供了证据,为监管机构、政策制定者和利益相关者支持可持续采矿实践提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal of Hazardous Materials 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3059
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.
期刊最新文献
PFAS released from the metals recovery process of the lithium-ion battery black mass “Bentogypsum”, a phosphoric acid purification residue: Characterization and implications for environmental and human health risk in Gabes (SE Tunisia) Multimedia spatial distribution and partitioning behavior of liquid crystal monomers in a typical urbanized river system within the Pearl River Delta, South China Effects of plastispheres and pristine microplastics on sediment microbial communities and nitrogen cycling under global warming Atmospheric microplastic deposition in 24 Chinese cities with different socio-economic development levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1