A new approach for product reliability prediction by considering the production factory lifecycle information

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Reliability Engineering & System Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2025.110915
Shashi Bhushan Gunjan, D.S. Srinivasu, Ramesh Babu N
{"title":"A new approach for product reliability prediction by considering the production factory lifecycle information","authors":"Shashi Bhushan Gunjan,&nbsp;D.S. Srinivasu,&nbsp;Ramesh Babu N","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.110915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Product reliability prediction is essential for OEMs to plan product maintenance and design improvement. Traditional approaches rely on '<em>product</em>' lifecycle data for reliability prediction, often not capturing the uncertainties in OEMs' decision-making. To address this, the present work focuses on '<em>factory' lifecycle information</em> in reliability prediction by introducing the concept of '<em>factory age,' i.e.,</em> cumulative interval for the observed <em>factory lifecycle</em>. The failure times for each product<em>,</em> in each <em>factory age interval,</em> were used to estimate the Weibull parameters, creating temporal data. A combination of grey- and support vector machine (SVM)-models, which complement each other in capturing global and local trends, and handling uncertainty from limited temporal data, was proposed to forecast the Weibull parameters accurately in the future <em>factory age interval</em>. The proposed approach was validated on two failure modes in a factory-producing turning centers, using data from the first 11 factory age intervals for model development. Reliability predictions for the last three intervals achieved root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.67 % and 1.48 % for failure modes I and II. Comparatively, individual grey (4.37 %, 5.11 %) and SVM (8.03 %, 10.60 %) models yielded higher RMSEs, while other reported models in literature showed in the range of 1.63 %–34.07 %, demonstrating the proposed approach's efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 110915"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025001188","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Product reliability prediction is essential for OEMs to plan product maintenance and design improvement. Traditional approaches rely on 'product' lifecycle data for reliability prediction, often not capturing the uncertainties in OEMs' decision-making. To address this, the present work focuses on 'factory' lifecycle information in reliability prediction by introducing the concept of 'factory age,' i.e., cumulative interval for the observed factory lifecycle. The failure times for each product, in each factory age interval, were used to estimate the Weibull parameters, creating temporal data. A combination of grey- and support vector machine (SVM)-models, which complement each other in capturing global and local trends, and handling uncertainty from limited temporal data, was proposed to forecast the Weibull parameters accurately in the future factory age interval. The proposed approach was validated on two failure modes in a factory-producing turning centers, using data from the first 11 factory age intervals for model development. Reliability predictions for the last three intervals achieved root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.67 % and 1.48 % for failure modes I and II. Comparatively, individual grey (4.37 %, 5.11 %) and SVM (8.03 %, 10.60 %) models yielded higher RMSEs, while other reported models in literature showed in the range of 1.63 %–34.07 %, demonstrating the proposed approach's efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Image texture feature fusion enhancement for bearing fault diagnosis based on maximum gradient Reconstruction-based Deep Unsupervised Adaptive Threshold Support Vector Data Description for wind turbine anomaly detection Data-driven global sensitivity analysis for group of random variables through knowledge-enhanced machine learning with normalizing flows Resilience quantification method of high-speed railway train diagram under operation section interference: Strategies and practices Probabilistic analysis of ship-bridge allisions when designing bridges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1