Analysis of ECMO usage in trauma patients at a major level 1 trauma center

Q4 Medicine Trauma Case Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.tcr.2025.101142
April Miller , Megan Post , Crescens Pellecchia , John Bini
{"title":"Analysis of ECMO usage in trauma patients at a major level 1 trauma center","authors":"April Miller ,&nbsp;Megan Post ,&nbsp;Crescens Pellecchia ,&nbsp;John Bini","doi":"10.1016/j.tcr.2025.101142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for decades in patients where adequate oxygenation could not be achieved using traditional efforts. Data is emerging regarding its use in trauma. Retrospective data was collected from the ECMO database at an urban Level 1 trauma center between 2020 and 2024. Inclusion data was age &gt; 17 years, trauma, and ECMO utilization during admission. Outcomes extracted included patient demographics, mechanism and type of injury, type of ECMO, ECMO days, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care LOS, date of injury to ECMO time, P/F ratio, ISS, complications, co-morbidities, anticoagulation, and mortality. Of the included 24 patients, 23 received veno-venous (VV) ECMO and one veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. The overall group demographics were: <em>n</em> = 23 males vs. <em>n</em> = 1 female, age 38.6 (±16.1) years. Duration of ECMO was 8.38 (±7.0) days, inpatient LOS 32.67 (±19.3) days, ICU LOS 26.33 (±18.0) days, DOI to initiation of ECMO 6.25 (±7.8). The ISS average was 29. The most common injury noted was rib fractures, average 4.6 (0−13) per patient. Other injuries included pneumothoraces (50 %), hemothoraces (35 %), blunt cardiac/sternal fracture (33 %). Complications on ECMO included transfusion requirement (54 %), DVT (13 %), and DIC (8 %). Of those studied, 87.5 % survived ECMO, with 70.8 % surviving to discharge. When using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests, there was not a statistically significant difference when comparing ISS, age, or P/F ratio between survivors versus non-survivors. Future research with increased sample size will be invaluable for the continued understanding of the role of ECMO in trauma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23291,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Case Reports","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352644025000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for decades in patients where adequate oxygenation could not be achieved using traditional efforts. Data is emerging regarding its use in trauma. Retrospective data was collected from the ECMO database at an urban Level 1 trauma center between 2020 and 2024. Inclusion data was age > 17 years, trauma, and ECMO utilization during admission. Outcomes extracted included patient demographics, mechanism and type of injury, type of ECMO, ECMO days, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care LOS, date of injury to ECMO time, P/F ratio, ISS, complications, co-morbidities, anticoagulation, and mortality. Of the included 24 patients, 23 received veno-venous (VV) ECMO and one veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. The overall group demographics were: n = 23 males vs. n = 1 female, age 38.6 (±16.1) years. Duration of ECMO was 8.38 (±7.0) days, inpatient LOS 32.67 (±19.3) days, ICU LOS 26.33 (±18.0) days, DOI to initiation of ECMO 6.25 (±7.8). The ISS average was 29. The most common injury noted was rib fractures, average 4.6 (0−13) per patient. Other injuries included pneumothoraces (50 %), hemothoraces (35 %), blunt cardiac/sternal fracture (33 %). Complications on ECMO included transfusion requirement (54 %), DVT (13 %), and DIC (8 %). Of those studied, 87.5 % survived ECMO, with 70.8 % surviving to discharge. When using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests, there was not a statistically significant difference when comparing ISS, age, or P/F ratio between survivors versus non-survivors. Future research with increased sample size will be invaluable for the continued understanding of the role of ECMO in trauma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma Case Reports
Trauma Case Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Trauma Case Reports is the only open access, online journal dedicated to the publication of case reports in all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Case reports on all aspects of trauma management, surgical procedures for all tissues, resuscitation, anaesthesia and trauma and tissue healing will be considered for publication by the international editorial team and will be subject to peer review. Bringing together these cases from an international authorship will shed light on surgical problems and help in their effective resolution.
期刊最新文献
Presentation, management and outcome of thoracic trauma in a resource-limited environment: A case series Atypical presentation of fat embolism syndrome: A case report An 11-month-old infant with laryngeal and pharyngeal injuries due to aspiration of an L-shaped metal fragment: A case report Knee arthrodesis with modular megaprosthesis as salvage procedure for the limb following in a patient with an infected knee tumor prosthesis: A case report Ipsilateral supracondylar humerus fracture and Monteggia fracture–dislocation with distal radius physeal fracture in a pediatric patient: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1