Differential impact of adopting Islamic banking: A quasi-experimental approach

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Research in International Business and Finance Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102793
Adil Saleem , RM Ammar Zahid , Judit Sagi
{"title":"Differential impact of adopting Islamic banking: A quasi-experimental approach","authors":"Adil Saleem ,&nbsp;RM Ammar Zahid ,&nbsp;Judit Sagi","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the treatment effect of the adoption of Islamic banking system in Pakistan. Compared to traditional banks, the distinct involvement of Islamic banks in real trading, along with its risk-sharing attributes, necessitates an examination of whether these differences impact economic growth. We applied a novel quasi-experimental research design using the synthetic control method (SCM) to examine the incremental effect of Islamic banking adoption on economic growth from 1990 to 2022. Results confirm that the Islamic financial system contributed differentially to economic growth in Pakistan, compared to the control group (51 countries), in the post-adoption period. The counterfactual effect on economic growth is estimated to be between 23% and 32% compared to the countries where Sharia banking is absent. The results are consistent and robust to alternative analysis, SCM with additional covariates, and placebo tests. The results also provide crucial implications for countries and central banks to implement Sharia-based banking, complementing the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 8.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102793"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925000492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the treatment effect of the adoption of Islamic banking system in Pakistan. Compared to traditional banks, the distinct involvement of Islamic banks in real trading, along with its risk-sharing attributes, necessitates an examination of whether these differences impact economic growth. We applied a novel quasi-experimental research design using the synthetic control method (SCM) to examine the incremental effect of Islamic banking adoption on economic growth from 1990 to 2022. Results confirm that the Islamic financial system contributed differentially to economic growth in Pakistan, compared to the control group (51 countries), in the post-adoption period. The counterfactual effect on economic growth is estimated to be between 23% and 32% compared to the countries where Sharia banking is absent. The results are consistent and robust to alternative analysis, SCM with additional covariates, and placebo tests. The results also provide crucial implications for countries and central banks to implement Sharia-based banking, complementing the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 8.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用伊斯兰银行的不同影响:一种准实验方法
本研究考察了巴基斯坦采用伊斯兰银行体系的治疗效果。与传统银行相比,伊斯兰银行在实际交易中的独特参与,以及它的风险分担属性,有必要研究这些差异是否会影响经济增长。我们采用了一种新的准实验研究设计,使用综合控制方法(SCM)来检验1990年至2022年伊斯兰银行对经济增长的增量效应。结果证实,与对照组(51个国家)相比,伊斯兰金融体系在采用伊斯兰金融体系后对巴基斯坦经济增长的贡献有所不同。与没有伊斯兰银行的国家相比,对经济增长的反事实影响估计在23%到32%之间。结果是一致的和稳健的替代分析,附加协变量的SCM和安慰剂测试。研究结果还为各国和中央银行实施基于伊斯兰教法的银行业务提供了重要启示,补充了联合国可持续发展目标8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
期刊最新文献
Bioeconomy enters the market: The effect of bioeconomy policies on stock market returns Diversification effect of green assets on cryptocurrencies: New evidence from R2 connectedness measures and multivariate portfolio strategies What determines potential usage of the digital euro? Academic independent directors and corporate misconduct: Evidence from China When banks borrow: Stock market reactions to loan announcements by financial vs. non-financial firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1