Reverse-breaking CFS (rev-bCFS): Disentangling conscious and unconscious effects by measuring suppression and dominance times during continuous flash suppression

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103830
Tommaso Ciorli , Lorenzo Pia , Timo Stein
{"title":"Reverse-breaking CFS (rev-bCFS): Disentangling conscious and unconscious effects by measuring suppression and dominance times during continuous flash suppression","authors":"Tommaso Ciorli ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Pia ,&nbsp;Timo Stein","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Breaking continuous flash suppression (bCFS) is a widely used experimental paradigm that exploits detection tasks to measure the time an invisible stimulus requires to access awareness. One<!--> <!-->unresolved issue is whether differences in detection times reflect unconscious or conscious processing. To answer this question, here we introduce a novel approach (reverse-bCFS [rev-bCFS]) that measures the time an initially visible stimulus requires to be suppressed from awareness. Results from two experiments using face stimuli indicate that rev-bCFS can capture conscious effects, which indicates that contrasting standard bCFS with rev-bCFS can isolate unconscious processing occurring specifically during bCFS. For example, while face inversion impacted both bCFS and rev-bCFS, effects were larger in bCFS, suggesting a distinct contribution of unconscious processing to the advantage of upright over inverted faces in accessing awareness. Combining standard bCFS and rev-bCFS may offer a fruitful approach to disentangle conscious and unconscious effects occurring during interocular suppression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810025000236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breaking continuous flash suppression (bCFS) is a widely used experimental paradigm that exploits detection tasks to measure the time an invisible stimulus requires to access awareness. One unresolved issue is whether differences in detection times reflect unconscious or conscious processing. To answer this question, here we introduce a novel approach (reverse-bCFS [rev-bCFS]) that measures the time an initially visible stimulus requires to be suppressed from awareness. Results from two experiments using face stimuli indicate that rev-bCFS can capture conscious effects, which indicates that contrasting standard bCFS with rev-bCFS can isolate unconscious processing occurring specifically during bCFS. For example, while face inversion impacted both bCFS and rev-bCFS, effects were larger in bCFS, suggesting a distinct contribution of unconscious processing to the advantage of upright over inverted faces in accessing awareness. Combining standard bCFS and rev-bCFS may offer a fruitful approach to disentangle conscious and unconscious effects occurring during interocular suppression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逆断CFS (rev-bCFS):通过测量连续闪光抑制期间的抑制和支配时间来解开意识和无意识效应的纠缠
打破连续闪光抑制(bCFS)是一种广泛使用的实验范式,它利用检测任务来测量不可见刺激进入意识所需的时间。一个尚未解决的问题是,检测时间的差异反映的是无意识处理还是有意识处理。为了回答这个问题,我们引入了一种新的方法(反向bcfs [rev-bCFS]),该方法测量从意识中抑制最初可见刺激所需的时间。两个面部刺激实验的结果表明,rev-bCFS可以捕获意识效应,这表明将标准bCFS与rev-bCFS进行对比可以隔离bCFS过程中特异性发生的无意识加工。例如,虽然面部倒置对bCFS和rev-bCFS都有影响,但bCFS的影响更大,这表明无意识加工对直立面部比倒立面部在获得意识方面的优势有明显的贡献。结合标准bCFS和rev-bCFS可能提供有效的方法来解开眼间抑制过程中发生的意识和无意识效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
期刊最新文献
The role of visual imagery and verbal coding in short-term memory conjunctive binding: evidence from aphantasia. Corrigendum to "Dispositional factors affecting the analgesic response to imagery and mindfulness suggestions during hypnosis" [Conscious. Cogn. 139 (2026) 103993]. Corrigendum to "Action without agent, but with awareness? Meditation and the modulation of agency induced sensory suppression". [Conscious. Cogn. (2026) 103960]. Intimation as a potentially useful subjective human Experience: Insights from cognitive psychology 100 years following Wallas's (1926) The Art of thought. Mind-Wandering Enhances Learning under Uncertainty: Insights from Iowa Gambling Task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1