Carolina Blank , Carlos Kebudi , Bruno Fanzeres , Olavo Bet
{"title":"A risk- and upside-aware contracting strategy methodology for renewable-composed generation companies","authors":"Carolina Blank , Carlos Kebudi , Bruno Fanzeres , Olavo Bet","doi":"10.1016/j.epsr.2025.111493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With a massive penetration of renewable energy observed in the past years, appropriately adjusting its portfolio of contracts is critical for Generation Companies (GenCos). In this context, most decision-making methodologies have as a composition the expected reward and risk-measure functionals as a foundation. However, one point typically overlooked by this standard framework is the absence of an appropriate treatment of the financial upside. Therefore, this work presents an alternative decision-making framework to prescribe risk- and upside-aware forward-contracting strategies for renewable-composed GenCos. Structurally, for a given threshold level that partitions the cash-flow probability distribution function into upside and downside regions, an upside-adjusted-by-risk value functional is derived. The resulting portfolio allocation model falls within the class of a non-convex optimization problem, for which we also devise an efficient reformulation procedure to recast the methodology into a convex optimization problem. To illustrate the applicability and validate the efficiency of the proposed methodology, two case studies were conducted, comparing the proposed methodology with the standard “<em>risk-reward</em>” decision-making framework. Overall, we observed that the risk faced by the GenCo using the proposed methodology is slightly higher when compared to the standard “<em>risk-reward</em>” decision-making framework, but the upside level is non-negligibly higher. Therefore, the proposed portfolio allocation methodology efficiently accounts for the problem’s uncertain factors with an adequate balance between downside and upside levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50547,"journal":{"name":"Electric Power Systems Research","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 111493"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electric Power Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378779625000859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With a massive penetration of renewable energy observed in the past years, appropriately adjusting its portfolio of contracts is critical for Generation Companies (GenCos). In this context, most decision-making methodologies have as a composition the expected reward and risk-measure functionals as a foundation. However, one point typically overlooked by this standard framework is the absence of an appropriate treatment of the financial upside. Therefore, this work presents an alternative decision-making framework to prescribe risk- and upside-aware forward-contracting strategies for renewable-composed GenCos. Structurally, for a given threshold level that partitions the cash-flow probability distribution function into upside and downside regions, an upside-adjusted-by-risk value functional is derived. The resulting portfolio allocation model falls within the class of a non-convex optimization problem, for which we also devise an efficient reformulation procedure to recast the methodology into a convex optimization problem. To illustrate the applicability and validate the efficiency of the proposed methodology, two case studies were conducted, comparing the proposed methodology with the standard “risk-reward” decision-making framework. Overall, we observed that the risk faced by the GenCo using the proposed methodology is slightly higher when compared to the standard “risk-reward” decision-making framework, but the upside level is non-negligibly higher. Therefore, the proposed portfolio allocation methodology efficiently accounts for the problem’s uncertain factors with an adequate balance between downside and upside levels.
期刊介绍:
Electric Power Systems Research is an international medium for the publication of original papers concerned with the generation, transmission, distribution and utilization of electrical energy. The journal aims at presenting important results of work in this field, whether in the form of applied research, development of new procedures or components, orginal application of existing knowledge or new designapproaches. The scope of Electric Power Systems Research is broad, encompassing all aspects of electric power systems. The following list of topics is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather to indicate topics that fall within the journal purview.
• Generation techniques ranging from advances in conventional electromechanical methods, through nuclear power generation, to renewable energy generation.
• Transmission, spanning the broad area from UHV (ac and dc) to network operation and protection, line routing and design.
• Substation work: equipment design, protection and control systems.
• Distribution techniques, equipment development, and smart grids.
• The utilization area from energy efficiency to distributed load levelling techniques.
• Systems studies including control techniques, planning, optimization methods, stability, security assessment and insulation coordination.