A risk- and upside-aware contracting strategy methodology for renewable-composed generation companies

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Electric Power Systems Research Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.epsr.2025.111493
Carolina Blank , Carlos Kebudi , Bruno Fanzeres , Olavo Bet
{"title":"A risk- and upside-aware contracting strategy methodology for renewable-composed generation companies","authors":"Carolina Blank ,&nbsp;Carlos Kebudi ,&nbsp;Bruno Fanzeres ,&nbsp;Olavo Bet","doi":"10.1016/j.epsr.2025.111493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With a massive penetration of renewable energy observed in the past years, appropriately adjusting its portfolio of contracts is critical for Generation Companies (GenCos). In this context, most decision-making methodologies have as a composition the expected reward and risk-measure functionals as a foundation. However, one point typically overlooked by this standard framework is the absence of an appropriate treatment of the financial upside. Therefore, this work presents an alternative decision-making framework to prescribe risk- and upside-aware forward-contracting strategies for renewable-composed GenCos. Structurally, for a given threshold level that partitions the cash-flow probability distribution function into upside and downside regions, an upside-adjusted-by-risk value functional is derived. The resulting portfolio allocation model falls within the class of a non-convex optimization problem, for which we also devise an efficient reformulation procedure to recast the methodology into a convex optimization problem. To illustrate the applicability and validate the efficiency of the proposed methodology, two case studies were conducted, comparing the proposed methodology with the standard “<em>risk-reward</em>” decision-making framework. Overall, we observed that the risk faced by the GenCo using the proposed methodology is slightly higher when compared to the standard “<em>risk-reward</em>” decision-making framework, but the upside level is non-negligibly higher. Therefore, the proposed portfolio allocation methodology efficiently accounts for the problem’s uncertain factors with an adequate balance between downside and upside levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50547,"journal":{"name":"Electric Power Systems Research","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 111493"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electric Power Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378779625000859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With a massive penetration of renewable energy observed in the past years, appropriately adjusting its portfolio of contracts is critical for Generation Companies (GenCos). In this context, most decision-making methodologies have as a composition the expected reward and risk-measure functionals as a foundation. However, one point typically overlooked by this standard framework is the absence of an appropriate treatment of the financial upside. Therefore, this work presents an alternative decision-making framework to prescribe risk- and upside-aware forward-contracting strategies for renewable-composed GenCos. Structurally, for a given threshold level that partitions the cash-flow probability distribution function into upside and downside regions, an upside-adjusted-by-risk value functional is derived. The resulting portfolio allocation model falls within the class of a non-convex optimization problem, for which we also devise an efficient reformulation procedure to recast the methodology into a convex optimization problem. To illustrate the applicability and validate the efficiency of the proposed methodology, two case studies were conducted, comparing the proposed methodology with the standard “risk-reward” decision-making framework. Overall, we observed that the risk faced by the GenCo using the proposed methodology is slightly higher when compared to the standard “risk-reward” decision-making framework, but the upside level is non-negligibly higher. Therefore, the proposed portfolio allocation methodology efficiently accounts for the problem’s uncertain factors with an adequate balance between downside and upside levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electric Power Systems Research
Electric Power Systems Research 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
17.90%
发文量
963
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Electric Power Systems Research is an international medium for the publication of original papers concerned with the generation, transmission, distribution and utilization of electrical energy. The journal aims at presenting important results of work in this field, whether in the form of applied research, development of new procedures or components, orginal application of existing knowledge or new designapproaches. The scope of Electric Power Systems Research is broad, encompassing all aspects of electric power systems. The following list of topics is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather to indicate topics that fall within the journal purview. • Generation techniques ranging from advances in conventional electromechanical methods, through nuclear power generation, to renewable energy generation. • Transmission, spanning the broad area from UHV (ac and dc) to network operation and protection, line routing and design. • Substation work: equipment design, protection and control systems. • Distribution techniques, equipment development, and smart grids. • The utilization area from energy efficiency to distributed load levelling techniques. • Systems studies including control techniques, planning, optimization methods, stability, security assessment and insulation coordination.
期刊最新文献
Sequential recovery of cyber–physical power systems with distributed generation Non-dominated sorting WOA electric vehicle charging station siting study based on dynamic trip chain A three-layer energy management system for hydrogen-powered ships combined instantaneous load forecasting Performance enhancement of a multilevel inverter in renewable energy systems using equilibrium optimizer Optimized design coordination of a single phase static VAr compensator for AC railway traction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1