{"title":"My friend, the enemy: Developing a model for coopetition in the professional services sector","authors":"Dominik Schlee, Tobias Gutmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coopetition, merging elements of cooperation and competition, has transitioned into a dynamic system characterized by mutual, and frequently reinforcing interactions, necessitating a more systematic consideration where companies must embrace openness. Despite the potential benefits, existing research lacks a comprehensive perspective into the application of a coopetitive strategy within professional service firms, with many of these efforts falling short of achieving their expected outcomes. Professional service firms face persistent and long-term coopetition configurations, leading to tensions and paradoxes that demand a holistic and systematic approach. To address this issue, the study employs a multi-case theory-building approach, analyzing a sample of efficiency and success polar types from eight professional services organizations. We propose a comprehensive dynamic coopetition lifecycle model that reveals coopetition-specific motivations, management activities, and conflicts inherent in professional services. This model highlights the unique conditions and tensions in the professional service sector, such as regulatory compliance, human capital reliance, confidentiality, and technology integration, that necessitate such an approach. This paper advances the discourse on resource and capability constraints in service research by introducing a dynamic coopetition lifecycle model. We clarify the conditions under which coopetition can prosper, its complexities, and offer actionable insights for professional services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 115252"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500075X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Coopetition, merging elements of cooperation and competition, has transitioned into a dynamic system characterized by mutual, and frequently reinforcing interactions, necessitating a more systematic consideration where companies must embrace openness. Despite the potential benefits, existing research lacks a comprehensive perspective into the application of a coopetitive strategy within professional service firms, with many of these efforts falling short of achieving their expected outcomes. Professional service firms face persistent and long-term coopetition configurations, leading to tensions and paradoxes that demand a holistic and systematic approach. To address this issue, the study employs a multi-case theory-building approach, analyzing a sample of efficiency and success polar types from eight professional services organizations. We propose a comprehensive dynamic coopetition lifecycle model that reveals coopetition-specific motivations, management activities, and conflicts inherent in professional services. This model highlights the unique conditions and tensions in the professional service sector, such as regulatory compliance, human capital reliance, confidentiality, and technology integration, that necessitate such an approach. This paper advances the discourse on resource and capability constraints in service research by introducing a dynamic coopetition lifecycle model. We clarify the conditions under which coopetition can prosper, its complexities, and offer actionable insights for professional services.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.