Jiayan Zhang , Zhihong Liu , Yu Li , Yanhong Dou , Mingjun Wang , Huicheng Zhou , Bo Xu
{"title":"Enhancing hydrological model performance through multi-source open-data utilization in the highly managed, data-scarce basin","authors":"Jiayan Zhang , Zhihong Liu , Yu Li , Yanhong Dou , Mingjun Wang , Huicheng Zhou , Bo Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Developing reliable hydrological models in highly managed basins is challenging due to multiple sources of uncertainty. The advent of open-source platforms providing publicly available datasets has the potential to mitigate these uncertainties. However, a comprehensive understanding of how these datasets impact model performance is lacking. This study takes the lower part of the YongDing River Basin (LYDRB) in northern China as a case to develop a hydrological model leveraging various open-source datasets, including water withdrawal activities, satellite-based streamflow, and remotely sensed evaporation. We design four comparative experiments to assess the impact of utilizing different data combinations on model performance. We find that the satellite-based streamflow data has the most significant impact, greatly enhancing streamflow simulation performance, with the NSE improving from the range of −1.5 to −0.39 to the range of 0.48 to 0.54 and the PBIAS improving from the range of −28 % to −63 % to the range of −3 % to −10 %. Water withdrawal data and remotely sensed evaporation data contribute to smaller performance improvements. The use of these two datasets may lead to poorer performance during the calibration period but better performance during the validation period. Specifically, remotely sensed evaporation data enhances model performance in streamflow simulation during the validation period, with NSE increasing by up to 0.1, although it results in a decrease of up to 0.04 in NSE during the calibration period. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for developing reliable and low-uncertainty hydrological models in highly managed and data-scarce basins by effectively utilizing various information sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"654 ","pages":"Article 132860"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425001982","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Developing reliable hydrological models in highly managed basins is challenging due to multiple sources of uncertainty. The advent of open-source platforms providing publicly available datasets has the potential to mitigate these uncertainties. However, a comprehensive understanding of how these datasets impact model performance is lacking. This study takes the lower part of the YongDing River Basin (LYDRB) in northern China as a case to develop a hydrological model leveraging various open-source datasets, including water withdrawal activities, satellite-based streamflow, and remotely sensed evaporation. We design four comparative experiments to assess the impact of utilizing different data combinations on model performance. We find that the satellite-based streamflow data has the most significant impact, greatly enhancing streamflow simulation performance, with the NSE improving from the range of −1.5 to −0.39 to the range of 0.48 to 0.54 and the PBIAS improving from the range of −28 % to −63 % to the range of −3 % to −10 %. Water withdrawal data and remotely sensed evaporation data contribute to smaller performance improvements. The use of these two datasets may lead to poorer performance during the calibration period but better performance during the validation period. Specifically, remotely sensed evaporation data enhances model performance in streamflow simulation during the validation period, with NSE increasing by up to 0.1, although it results in a decrease of up to 0.04 in NSE during the calibration period. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for developing reliable and low-uncertainty hydrological models in highly managed and data-scarce basins by effectively utilizing various information sources.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.