Enhancing hydrological model performance through multi-source open-data utilization in the highly managed, data-scarce basin

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132860
Jiayan Zhang , Zhihong Liu , Yu Li , Yanhong Dou , Mingjun Wang , Huicheng Zhou , Bo Xu
{"title":"Enhancing hydrological model performance through multi-source open-data utilization in the highly managed, data-scarce basin","authors":"Jiayan Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhihong Liu ,&nbsp;Yu Li ,&nbsp;Yanhong Dou ,&nbsp;Mingjun Wang ,&nbsp;Huicheng Zhou ,&nbsp;Bo Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Developing reliable hydrological models in highly managed basins is challenging due to multiple sources of uncertainty. The advent of open-source platforms providing publicly available datasets has the potential to mitigate these uncertainties. However, a comprehensive understanding of how these datasets impact model performance is lacking. This study takes the lower part of the YongDing River Basin (LYDRB) in northern China as a case to develop a hydrological model leveraging various open-source datasets, including water withdrawal activities, satellite-based streamflow, and remotely sensed evaporation. We design four comparative experiments to assess the impact of utilizing different data combinations on model performance. We find that the satellite-based streamflow data has the most significant impact, greatly enhancing streamflow simulation performance, with the NSE improving from the range of −1.5 to −0.39 to the range of 0.48 to 0.54 and the PBIAS improving from the range of −28 % to −63 % to the range of −3 % to −10 %. Water withdrawal data and remotely sensed evaporation data contribute to smaller performance improvements. The use of these two datasets may lead to poorer performance during the calibration period but better performance during the validation period. Specifically, remotely sensed evaporation data enhances model performance in streamflow simulation during the validation period, with NSE increasing by up to 0.1, although it results in a decrease of up to 0.04 in NSE during the calibration period. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for developing reliable and low-uncertainty hydrological models in highly managed and data-scarce basins by effectively utilizing various information sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"654 ","pages":"Article 132860"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425001982","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing reliable hydrological models in highly managed basins is challenging due to multiple sources of uncertainty. The advent of open-source platforms providing publicly available datasets has the potential to mitigate these uncertainties. However, a comprehensive understanding of how these datasets impact model performance is lacking. This study takes the lower part of the YongDing River Basin (LYDRB) in northern China as a case to develop a hydrological model leveraging various open-source datasets, including water withdrawal activities, satellite-based streamflow, and remotely sensed evaporation. We design four comparative experiments to assess the impact of utilizing different data combinations on model performance. We find that the satellite-based streamflow data has the most significant impact, greatly enhancing streamflow simulation performance, with the NSE improving from the range of −1.5 to −0.39 to the range of 0.48 to 0.54 and the PBIAS improving from the range of −28 % to −63 % to the range of −3 % to −10 %. Water withdrawal data and remotely sensed evaporation data contribute to smaller performance improvements. The use of these two datasets may lead to poorer performance during the calibration period but better performance during the validation period. Specifically, remotely sensed evaporation data enhances model performance in streamflow simulation during the validation period, with NSE increasing by up to 0.1, although it results in a decrease of up to 0.04 in NSE during the calibration period. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for developing reliable and low-uncertainty hydrological models in highly managed and data-scarce basins by effectively utilizing various information sources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由于存在多种不确定因素,在管理严格的流域开发可靠的水文模型具有挑战性。提供公开数据集的开源平台的出现有可能减轻这些不确定性。然而,目前还缺乏对这些数据集如何影响模型性能的全面了解。本研究以中国北方永定河流域(LYDRB)下游为案例,利用各种开源数据集(包括取水活动、基于卫星的河水流量和遥感蒸发)开发水文模型。我们设计了四个对比实验来评估利用不同数据组合对模型性能的影响。我们发现,基于卫星的溪流数据影响最大,大大提高了溪流模拟性能,NSE 从 -1.5 到 -0.39 的范围提高到 0.48 到 0.54 的范围,PBIAS 从 -28 % 到 -63 % 的范围提高到 -3 % 到 -10 % 的范围。取水数据和遥感蒸发数据对性能改善的贡献较小。使用这两个数据集可能会导致在校准期间性能较差,但在验证期间性能较好。具体而言,遥感蒸发数据可提高模型在验证期的河流模拟性能,NSE 最多可提高 0.1,但在校准期 NSE 最多会降低 0.04。总之,这项研究为在高度管理和数据稀缺的流域通过有效利用各种信息源开发可靠和低不确定性的水文模型提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Integrating rainfall severity and soil saturation indices to define hydro-meteorological thresholds for landslides Hydrogeological and hydrochemical processes affecting groundwater quality on volcanic islands: Insights from El Hierro (Canary Islands, Spain) Introducing time series features based dynamic weights estimation framework for hydrologic forecast merging Editorial Board Understanding the linkages between seasonal variability and annual trends in groundwater levels in alluvial aquifers of Uttar Pradesh, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1