Ethics and Equity: Addressing Violations of the Belmont Report principles for research staff

IF 2.3 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES World Development Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100662
Jana Kuhnt , Lennart Kaplan , Ana Garcia-Hernandez , Julia Leininger , Janina I. Steinert
{"title":"Ethics and Equity: Addressing Violations of the Belmont Report principles for research staff","authors":"Jana Kuhnt ,&nbsp;Lennart Kaplan ,&nbsp;Ana Garcia-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Julia Leininger ,&nbsp;Janina I. Steinert","doi":"10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Particularly in development research, data is often collected in settings characterised by high deprivation, risk and power asymmetries, which aggravates working conditions of research staff. This perspectives article introduces a novel conceptual framework that identifies ethical challenges, failures and potential solutions. It is based on an analysis of 57 semi-structured interviews with research staff across hierarchies, world regions, gender and institutions. We find that the research environments in the ‘Global South’ often pose particular challenges to research staff and if not addressed can be harmful in terms of insecurity, sexual harassment, emotional distress, exploitative employment conditions and discrimination. Addressing ethical failures in research requires change across different levels, with a particular focus on alleviating structural asymmetries as a key driver of ethical challenges. Our findings provide a toolkit to (i) ensure the wellbeing of research staff, (ii) improve the ethical integrity of empirical research, and (iii) increase the rigour of data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37831,"journal":{"name":"World Development Perspectives","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292925000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Particularly in development research, data is often collected in settings characterised by high deprivation, risk and power asymmetries, which aggravates working conditions of research staff. This perspectives article introduces a novel conceptual framework that identifies ethical challenges, failures and potential solutions. It is based on an analysis of 57 semi-structured interviews with research staff across hierarchies, world regions, gender and institutions. We find that the research environments in the ‘Global South’ often pose particular challenges to research staff and if not addressed can be harmful in terms of insecurity, sexual harassment, emotional distress, exploitative employment conditions and discrimination. Addressing ethical failures in research requires change across different levels, with a particular focus on alleviating structural asymmetries as a key driver of ethical challenges. Our findings provide a toolkit to (i) ensure the wellbeing of research staff, (ii) improve the ethical integrity of empirical research, and (iii) increase the rigour of data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道德与公平:解决研究人员违反贝尔蒙特报告原则的问题
特别是在发展研究中,数据往往是在高度剥夺、风险和权力不对称的环境中收集的,这使研究人员的工作条件恶化。这篇展望文章介绍了一个新的概念框架,识别道德挑战,失败和潜在的解决方案。该报告基于对57个半结构化访谈的分析,这些访谈涉及不同层级、世界地区、性别和机构的研究人员。我们发现,“全球南方”的研究环境经常给研究人员带来特殊的挑战,如果不加以解决,可能会在不安全、性骚扰、情绪困扰、剥削性就业条件和歧视方面造成伤害。解决研究中的伦理失败需要在不同层面上进行改变,特别关注减轻结构不对称,这是伦理挑战的关键驱动因素。我们的研究结果提供了一个工具包来(i)确保研究人员的福祉,(ii)提高实证研究的道德完整性,以及(iii)提高数据的严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Development Perspectives
World Development Perspectives Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: World Development Perspectives is a multi-disciplinary journal of international development. It seeks to explore ways of improving human well-being by examining the performance and impact of interventions designed to address issues related to: poverty alleviation, public health and malnutrition, agricultural production, natural resource governance, globalization and transnational processes, technological progress, gender and social discrimination, and participation in economic and political life. Above all, we are particularly interested in the role of historical, legal, social, economic, political, biophysical, and/or ecological contexts in shaping development processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Shield or substitute: financial development and the rise of government social protection Migration and social reproduction of tribal communities in Rajasthan, India Promoting livelihood diversification in vulnerable rural coastal communities in India Socioeconomic feasibility of biocatalyst technology in salt farming: insights from West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia Impact of Chinese foreign direct investment on environmental stress in Pakistan: mediating role of technological innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1