A novel utilités additives—based social network group decision-making method considering preference consistency

IF 6.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2025.110947
Zhiwei Xu , Peng Li , Cuiping Wei , Jian Liu
{"title":"A novel utilités additives—based social network group decision-making method considering preference consistency","authors":"Zhiwei Xu ,&nbsp;Peng Li ,&nbsp;Cuiping Wei ,&nbsp;Jian Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2025.110947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nowadays, social networks and mobile internet have become prominent features of daily life, leading to increasingly interconnected relationships among decision-makers (DMs). The social network group decision-making (SNGDM) method uses social network analysis technology to consider the impact of social trust relationships among DMs on decision results during the decision-making process. The Utilités Additives (UTA) method can infer the DMs’ preference structure based on the partial preference information. This method effectively resolves the consensus problem in SNGDM by utilizing the DMs’ preference structure. This paper proposes a novel SNGDM method based on the UTA method that considers the consistency of preference information provided by DMs in the form of pairwise comparisons. Firstly, since the trust relationship between DMs is asymmetric and DM’s opinions are usually different, a new preference conflict degree between DMs in SNGDM is defined. Then, to consider the opinion differences and social trust relationship between DMs in the clustering process, a clustering method based on the preference conflict degree is proposed. Furthermore, to obtain the maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons for each DM, we designed a simulation algorithm involving an optimization model to examine the pairwise comparisons provided by the DMs and to obtain the maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons. Moreover, since using only preference information in the form of pairwise comparisons in the consensus reaching process (CRP) leads to a limited space for changes in DMs’ opinions, a method for converting the opinions of DMs based on maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons is proposed. This method transforms pairwise comparisons provided by DMs into fuzzy preference relations (FPRs). In addition, in the CRP, a method for adjusting the FPRs of DMs is proposed. Finally, a case study is conducted using real data on new energy vehicles from Autohome to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110947"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225000932","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, social networks and mobile internet have become prominent features of daily life, leading to increasingly interconnected relationships among decision-makers (DMs). The social network group decision-making (SNGDM) method uses social network analysis technology to consider the impact of social trust relationships among DMs on decision results during the decision-making process. The Utilités Additives (UTA) method can infer the DMs’ preference structure based on the partial preference information. This method effectively resolves the consensus problem in SNGDM by utilizing the DMs’ preference structure. This paper proposes a novel SNGDM method based on the UTA method that considers the consistency of preference information provided by DMs in the form of pairwise comparisons. Firstly, since the trust relationship between DMs is asymmetric and DM’s opinions are usually different, a new preference conflict degree between DMs in SNGDM is defined. Then, to consider the opinion differences and social trust relationship between DMs in the clustering process, a clustering method based on the preference conflict degree is proposed. Furthermore, to obtain the maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons for each DM, we designed a simulation algorithm involving an optimization model to examine the pairwise comparisons provided by the DMs and to obtain the maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons. Moreover, since using only preference information in the form of pairwise comparisons in the consensus reaching process (CRP) leads to a limited space for changes in DMs’ opinions, a method for converting the opinions of DMs based on maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons is proposed. This method transforms pairwise comparisons provided by DMs into fuzzy preference relations (FPRs). In addition, in the CRP, a method for adjusting the FPRs of DMs is proposed. Finally, a case study is conducted using real data on new energy vehicles from Autohome to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种考虑偏好一致性的基于效用因子的社会网络群体决策方法
如今,社交网络和移动互联网已经成为日常生活的突出特征,导致决策者之间的联系日益紧密。社会网络群体决策(social network group decision, SNGDM)方法利用社会网络分析技术,考虑决策过程中dm之间的社会信任关系对决策结果的影响。utilitics - Additives (UTA)方法可以根据部分偏好信息推断出dm的偏好结构。该方法利用dm的偏好结构,有效地解决了SNGDM中的一致性问题。本文提出了一种基于UTA方法的SNGDM方法,该方法考虑了dm以两两比较的形式提供的偏好信息的一致性。首先,由于DM之间的信任关系是不对称的,DM的意见通常是不同的,因此定义了SNGDM中DM之间新的偏好冲突程度。然后,考虑聚类过程中决策主体之间的意见差异和社会信任关系,提出了基于偏好冲突程度的聚类方法。此外,为了获得每个DM的一致性两两比较的最大子集,我们设计了一个包含优化模型的模拟算法来检查DM提供的两两比较,并获得一致性两两比较的最大子集。此外,由于在共识达成过程(CRP)中只使用两两比较形式的偏好信息,导致决策决策者意见变化的空间有限,提出了一种基于一致性两两比较的最大子集的决策决策者意见转换方法。该方法将dm提供的两两比较转化为模糊偏好关系(fpr)。此外,在CRP中,提出了一种调整DMs fpr的方法。最后,以汽车之家新能源汽车的实际数据为例,验证了所提方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
Competing for the most profitable tour: the orienteering interdiction game A two-stage approach for collaborative scheduling of closed-loop manufacturing considering dynamic power cost: An enhanced Benders decomposition optimization Budget-scalable inference-time hybrid MCTS for enhancing DRL-based flexible job shop scheduling Integrated workforce and territory planning for home social care under variable demand A Data-Driven Multi-Objective optimization framework for dynamic job shop scheduling with order Acceptance, inventory and Energy-Aware decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1