Elizabeth A. LaRue, Kylie M. Rezendes, Dennis H. Choi, Jianmin Wang, Anna G. Downing, Songlin Fei, Brady S. Hardiman
{"title":"Gradient surface metrics of ecosystem structural diversity and their relationship with productivity across macrosystems","authors":"Elizabeth A. LaRue, Kylie M. Rezendes, Dennis H. Choi, Jianmin Wang, Anna G. Downing, Songlin Fei, Brady S. Hardiman","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Structural diversity—the volume and physical arrangement of vegetation within the three-dimensional (3D) space of ecosystems—is a predictor of ecosystem function that can be measured at large scales with remote sensing. However, the landscape composition and configuration of structural diversity across macrosystems have not been well described. Using a relatively recently developed method to quantify landscape composition and configuration of continuous habitat or terrain, we propose the application of gradient surface metrics (GSMs) to quantify landscape patterns of structural diversity and provide insights into how its spatial pattern relates to ecosystem function. We first applied an example set of GSMs that represent landscape heterogeneity, dominance, and edge density to Lidar-derived structural diversity within 28 forested landscapes at National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) sites. Second, we tested for forest type, geographic location, and climate drivers of macroscale variation in GSMs of structural diversity (GSM-SD). Third, we demonstrated the utility of these metrics for understanding spatial patterns of ecosystem function in a case study with NDVI, a proxy of productivity. We found that GSM-SD varied in landscapes within macrosystems, with forest type, geographic location, and climate being significantly related to some but not all metrics. We also found that dominance of high peaks of height and vertical complexity of canopy vegetation and the heterogeneity of the vertical complexity and coefficient of variation of canopy vegetation height within 120-m patches were negatively correlated with NDVI across the 28 NEON sites. However, forest type always had a significant interaction term between these GSM-SD and NDVI relationships. Our study demonstrates that GSMs are useful to describe the landscape composition and configuration of structural diversity and its relationship with productivity that warrants further consideration for spatially motivated management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70172","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Structural diversity—the volume and physical arrangement of vegetation within the three-dimensional (3D) space of ecosystems—is a predictor of ecosystem function that can be measured at large scales with remote sensing. However, the landscape composition and configuration of structural diversity across macrosystems have not been well described. Using a relatively recently developed method to quantify landscape composition and configuration of continuous habitat or terrain, we propose the application of gradient surface metrics (GSMs) to quantify landscape patterns of structural diversity and provide insights into how its spatial pattern relates to ecosystem function. We first applied an example set of GSMs that represent landscape heterogeneity, dominance, and edge density to Lidar-derived structural diversity within 28 forested landscapes at National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) sites. Second, we tested for forest type, geographic location, and climate drivers of macroscale variation in GSMs of structural diversity (GSM-SD). Third, we demonstrated the utility of these metrics for understanding spatial patterns of ecosystem function in a case study with NDVI, a proxy of productivity. We found that GSM-SD varied in landscapes within macrosystems, with forest type, geographic location, and climate being significantly related to some but not all metrics. We also found that dominance of high peaks of height and vertical complexity of canopy vegetation and the heterogeneity of the vertical complexity and coefficient of variation of canopy vegetation height within 120-m patches were negatively correlated with NDVI across the 28 NEON sites. However, forest type always had a significant interaction term between these GSM-SD and NDVI relationships. Our study demonstrates that GSMs are useful to describe the landscape composition and configuration of structural diversity and its relationship with productivity that warrants further consideration for spatially motivated management decisions.
期刊介绍:
The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.