Promoting Racial Justice in Cancer Clinical Trials: Community Engaged Solutions for Bridging Gaps

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70690
Deana M. Williams, Chaya M. Pflugeisen, Khadijah Ameen, Toby K. Chen, Sheree Cooks, Bernadette C. Ray, Melissa Foster, De Phillips, Lizbeth Sanchez, Keywanna Hardiman, Cynthia Smith, Jennifer Slim
{"title":"Promoting Racial Justice in Cancer Clinical Trials: Community Engaged Solutions for Bridging Gaps","authors":"Deana M. Williams,&nbsp;Chaya M. Pflugeisen,&nbsp;Khadijah Ameen,&nbsp;Toby K. Chen,&nbsp;Sheree Cooks,&nbsp;Bernadette C. Ray,&nbsp;Melissa Foster,&nbsp;De Phillips,&nbsp;Lizbeth Sanchez,&nbsp;Keywanna Hardiman,&nbsp;Cynthia Smith,&nbsp;Jennifer Slim","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Racially and ethnically diverse populations are disproportionately burdened with and more likely to die from cancer than White populations but remain persistently underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. Thus, the safety and efficacy assessments of novel therapies may not apply to all populations, and guidelines are developed using trials that inadequately reflect our population. This study aims to explore healthcare experiences, cancer clinical trial perceptions, and solutions for bridging gaps in cancer clinical trials among communities of color.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We held a series of five focus groups with 23 survivors and caregivers of color. These sessions explored perspectives around cancer care and research, clinical trials recruitment and messaging, and priorities around addressing the current insufficiency in representation in cancer research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our focus group data was analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. Four themes were present including (1) high motivation to participate in cancer trials and desire for better outreach and education within communities of color; (2) examples of just care as a model for improving access to clinical trials; (3) manifestations of power and inequity in healthcare inhibiting opportunities for clinical trial participation; and (4) the need for trust-building at the healthcare, community, and interpersonal levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings demonstrate that people of color strongly desire clinical trial options and discussions during cancer care, and trust-building is foundational to opening pathways to research participation. We offer concrete steps for increasing racial justice in cancer clinical trials that serve as a point of reflection and guidance for healthcare professionals, researchers, and clinical trials teams.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70690","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Racially and ethnically diverse populations are disproportionately burdened with and more likely to die from cancer than White populations but remain persistently underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. Thus, the safety and efficacy assessments of novel therapies may not apply to all populations, and guidelines are developed using trials that inadequately reflect our population. This study aims to explore healthcare experiences, cancer clinical trial perceptions, and solutions for bridging gaps in cancer clinical trials among communities of color.

Methods

We held a series of five focus groups with 23 survivors and caregivers of color. These sessions explored perspectives around cancer care and research, clinical trials recruitment and messaging, and priorities around addressing the current insufficiency in representation in cancer research.

Results

Our focus group data was analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. Four themes were present including (1) high motivation to participate in cancer trials and desire for better outreach and education within communities of color; (2) examples of just care as a model for improving access to clinical trials; (3) manifestations of power and inequity in healthcare inhibiting opportunities for clinical trial participation; and (4) the need for trust-building at the healthcare, community, and interpersonal levels.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that people of color strongly desire clinical trial options and discussions during cancer care, and trust-building is foundational to opening pathways to research participation. We offer concrete steps for increasing racial justice in cancer clinical trials that serve as a point of reflection and guidance for healthcare professionals, researchers, and clinical trials teams.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进癌症临床试验中的种族公正:社区参与解决方案弥合差距
与白人相比,种族和民族多样化的人群承受着不成比例的癌症负担,更有可能死于癌症,但在癌症临床试验中的代表性仍然不足。因此,新疗法的安全性和有效性评估可能并不适用于所有人群,指南的制定使用的试验不能充分反映我们的人群。本研究旨在探讨有色人种社区在癌症临床试验方面的医疗保健经验、癌症临床试验认知和解决方案。方法我们对23名幸存者和有色人种的照顾者进行了一系列的5个焦点小组。这些会议探讨了围绕癌症护理和研究,临床试验招募和信息传递的观点,以及围绕解决当前癌症研究中代表性不足的优先事项。结果采用归纳主题法对焦点小组数据进行分析。目前有四个主题,包括(1)参与癌症试验的高动机和对有色人种社区更好的推广和教育的渴望;(2)将公正护理作为改善临床试验可及性的范例;(3)医疗保健中的权力和不公平现象抑制了临床试验参与的机会;(4)在医疗保健、社区和人际层面建立信任的需求。我们的研究结果表明,有色人种强烈希望在癌症治疗过程中进行临床试验选择和讨论,而建立信任是打开研究参与途径的基础。我们提供了在癌症临床试验中增加种族公正的具体步骤,作为医疗保健专业人员、研究人员和临床试验团队的反思和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
期刊最新文献
Nationwide Incidence, Treatment Pattern, and Prognosis of Primary CNS Lymphoma in Taiwan, 2012-2020: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Molecular Characterization and Its Clinical Application of GNAS Variants in Intramuscular Myxoma. A Disproportionality Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Platinum-Based Agents Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database. The Role of Gut Microbiota and Their Derived Metabolites in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Ovarian Cancer. PSAT1 Promotes NSCLC Progression via the De Novo Serine Synthesis Pathway and Represents a Therapeutic Vulnerability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1