Cover crop and tillage effects on soil microbial communities in a corn cropping system

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRONOMY Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/agg2.70054
S. S. Mendis, R. P. Udawatta, M. P. Davis, B. Gurmessa, M. Salceda, M. E. Herget
{"title":"Cover crop and tillage effects on soil microbial communities in a corn cropping system","authors":"S. S. Mendis,&nbsp;R. P. Udawatta,&nbsp;M. P. Davis,&nbsp;B. Gurmessa,&nbsp;M. Salceda,&nbsp;M. E. Herget","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil microbial communities have numerous soil ecological and physiological functions. However, knowledge is lacking on the interaction effects of no-till and cover crops (CC) practices on these soil health indicators. This study evaluated the effects of CC and tillage on soil microbial communities in a corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) system. The study was conducted for 2 consecutive years on plots allotted to three practices: (1) no-till and cover crop (NC), (2) conventional till and no cover crop (CN), and (3) no-till no cover crop (NN). A grass strip (G) was used as a reference, assuming it was subjected to the least disturbance. Surface (0–5 cm and 5–10 cm) soils were sampled over 2 years in April and October. Soil microbial biomass was measured using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis. Seasonal variations indicated greater microbial biomass in fall than in spring. The G and NC significantly increased soil microbial biomass at both depths compared to CN and NN during fall 2021 sampling and numerically in fall 2020, where greater changes were observed at 0- to 5-cm depth. In fall 2021 sampling, NC practices had 65%–75% more total microbial biomass than CN and NN at both depths (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with total bacterial biomass 70% greater (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.002) and total fungal biomass 75%–85% greater (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.007). NC also showed 85% more actinomycetes biomass than CN at 5- to 10-cm depth (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The study concluded that soil microbial communities significantly improved after two CC seasons, with higher microbial biomass in fall compared to spring.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil microbial communities have numerous soil ecological and physiological functions. However, knowledge is lacking on the interaction effects of no-till and cover crops (CC) practices on these soil health indicators. This study evaluated the effects of CC and tillage on soil microbial communities in a corn (Zea mays L.) system. The study was conducted for 2 consecutive years on plots allotted to three practices: (1) no-till and cover crop (NC), (2) conventional till and no cover crop (CN), and (3) no-till no cover crop (NN). A grass strip (G) was used as a reference, assuming it was subjected to the least disturbance. Surface (0–5 cm and 5–10 cm) soils were sampled over 2 years in April and October. Soil microbial biomass was measured using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis. Seasonal variations indicated greater microbial biomass in fall than in spring. The G and NC significantly increased soil microbial biomass at both depths compared to CN and NN during fall 2021 sampling and numerically in fall 2020, where greater changes were observed at 0- to 5-cm depth. In fall 2021 sampling, NC practices had 65%–75% more total microbial biomass than CN and NN at both depths (p < 0.001), with total bacterial biomass 70% greater (p < 0.002) and total fungal biomass 75%–85% greater (p < 0.007). NC also showed 85% more actinomycetes biomass than CN at 5- to 10-cm depth (p < 0.05). The study concluded that soil microbial communities significantly improved after two CC seasons, with higher microbial biomass in fall compared to spring.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
覆盖作物和耕作方式对玉米种植系统土壤微生物群落的影响
土壤微生物群落具有多种土壤生态生理功能。然而,关于免耕和覆盖作物(CC)做法对这些土壤健康指标的交互作用的知识缺乏。本研究评价了CC和耕作对玉米(Zea mays L.)土壤微生物群落的影响。在连续2年的试验中,试验地块分为三种模式:(1)免耕不覆盖(NC)、(2)常规耕作不覆盖(CN)和(3)免耕不覆盖(NN)。以草条(G)为参照,假设其受到的干扰最小。在4月和10月对表层(0-5 cm和5-10 cm)土壤进行取样。采用磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)法测定土壤微生物生物量。季节变化表明,秋季微生物量大于春季。在2021年秋季取样期间,与CN和NN相比,G和NC显著增加了两个深度的土壤微生物生物量,在2020年秋季的数值上,在0至5 cm深度观察到更大的变化。在2021年秋季采样中,在两个深度,NC实践的微生物总生物量比CN和NN多65%-75% (p <;0.001),总细菌生物量增加70% (p <;0.002),真菌总生物量增加75%-85% (p <;0.007)。在5 ~ 10cm深度,NC的放线菌生物量也比CN高85% (p <;0.05)。研究表明,两个CC季节后,土壤微生物群落显著改善,秋季微生物生物量高于春季。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of soil tillage and fertility management on acid phosphatase activity in corn (Zea mays L.) in two long-term crop rotations Analysis of historical climate change and its impacts on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Central Oromia, Ethiopia The impact of soil erosion on corn yields: A spatial regression analysis Response of soil characteristics and N2O emissions to fertilizer reduction strategies in highland summer vegetable production Effect of soil health management on soil water storage for climate resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1