Chiral Separation and Determination of Multiple Organophosphorus Pesticide Enantiomers in Soil Based on Cellulose-Based Chiral Column by LC–MS/MS

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of separation science Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/jssc.70100
Liang Li, Rendan Zhou, Huiying Xie, Gang Li, Zhiguang Xu, Meijia Liu, Wanting Gao
{"title":"Chiral Separation and Determination of Multiple Organophosphorus Pesticide Enantiomers in Soil Based on Cellulose-Based Chiral Column by LC–MS/MS","authors":"Liang Li,&nbsp;Rendan Zhou,&nbsp;Huiying Xie,&nbsp;Gang Li,&nbsp;Zhiguang Xu,&nbsp;Meijia Liu,&nbsp;Wanting Gao","doi":"10.1002/jssc.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The widespread use of organophosphorus pesticides (OPs) has raised significant environmental and health concerns due to their residues in soil and potential entry into the food chain. This study introduced chiral analysis methods for four OPs—methamidophos (METHP), dipterex (DIP), malathion (MALA), and isothiophos-methyl (ISOME)—using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) with cellulose-based chiral columns. Three distinct methods were established: one for METHP, another for DIP, and a third for MALA and ISOME. Key chromatographic variables, including organic mobile phases and column temperatures, were systematically optimized, achieving maximum resolutions (<i>R</i>s) of 1.61 for METHP, 2.40 for DIP, 1.70 for MALA, and 2.02 for ISOME. The QuEChERS method was employed for sample pretreatment, ensuring high recoveries. All three methods demonstrated excellent linearity (<i>R</i> &gt; 0.998), accuracy with recoveries ranging from 79% to 121%, precision with RSD% &lt; 11%, and sensitivity with low limits of enantiomer detection (LODs) as low as 0.17 µg/kg for METHP, 0.087 µg/kg for DIP, 0.062 µg/kg for MALA, and 0.054 µg/kg for ISOME, representing a sensitivity improvement of 16–172 times compared to existing methods. Field soil samples from Yangzizhou District, Nanchang, China, revealed significant contamination by ISOME, with concentrations of a single enantiomer reaching up to 8343 µg/kg, while MALA exhibited varying enantiomeric ratios with depth. This study provides robust analytical tools for monitoring chiral OP residues in soil, contributing to food safety and environmental protection.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of organophosphorus pesticides (OPs) has raised significant environmental and health concerns due to their residues in soil and potential entry into the food chain. This study introduced chiral analysis methods for four OPs—methamidophos (METHP), dipterex (DIP), malathion (MALA), and isothiophos-methyl (ISOME)—using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) with cellulose-based chiral columns. Three distinct methods were established: one for METHP, another for DIP, and a third for MALA and ISOME. Key chromatographic variables, including organic mobile phases and column temperatures, were systematically optimized, achieving maximum resolutions (Rs) of 1.61 for METHP, 2.40 for DIP, 1.70 for MALA, and 2.02 for ISOME. The QuEChERS method was employed for sample pretreatment, ensuring high recoveries. All three methods demonstrated excellent linearity (R > 0.998), accuracy with recoveries ranging from 79% to 121%, precision with RSD% < 11%, and sensitivity with low limits of enantiomer detection (LODs) as low as 0.17 µg/kg for METHP, 0.087 µg/kg for DIP, 0.062 µg/kg for MALA, and 0.054 µg/kg for ISOME, representing a sensitivity improvement of 16–172 times compared to existing methods. Field soil samples from Yangzizhou District, Nanchang, China, revealed significant contamination by ISOME, with concentrations of a single enantiomer reaching up to 8343 µg/kg, while MALA exhibited varying enantiomeric ratios with depth. This study provides robust analytical tools for monitoring chiral OP residues in soil, contributing to food safety and environmental protection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of separation science
Journal of separation science 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
408
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.
期刊最新文献
Recent Advances in Bioanalysis of Cephalosporins Toward Green Sample Preparation Recent Advances in Bioanalysis of Cephalosporins Toward Green Sample Preparation From Complexity to Clarity: Expanding Metabolome Coverage With Innovative Analytical Strategies Chiral Separation and Determination of Multiple Organophosphorus Pesticide Enantiomers in Soil Based on Cellulose-Based Chiral Column by LC–MS/MS Chiral Separation and Determination of Multiple Organophosphorus Pesticide Enantiomers in Soil Based on Cellulose-Based Chiral Column by LC–MS/MS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1