Effective Innovative Technologies and One Health Strategies in Mitigating Aflatoxin Contamination in Peanut Oil: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Science & Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/fsn3.70062
Chalachew Yenew, Seblework Mekonen, Argaw Ambelu, Almaw Genet Yeshiwas
{"title":"Effective Innovative Technologies and One Health Strategies in Mitigating Aflatoxin Contamination in Peanut Oil: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Chalachew Yenew,&nbsp;Seblework Mekonen,&nbsp;Argaw Ambelu,&nbsp;Almaw Genet Yeshiwas","doi":"10.1002/fsn3.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aflatoxin contamination in peanut oil poses significant health, agricultural, and environmental risks. This study assesses the effectiveness of advanced technologies and One Health strategies in mitigating these risks. Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluate the effectiveness of integrated approaches. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (September 2010–September 2024) on aflatoxin mitigation in peanut oil. We included studies involving agricultural, health, and environmental interventions, focusing on Aflasafe, ozonation, and One Health strategies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled effect sizes. Our review of 30 studies, including five meta-analyses, highlights that advanced mitigation methods like Aflasafe (90%, 95% CI: 85%–95%), Ozonation (85%, 95% CI: 70%–95%), and Biological Control (80%, 95% CI: 70%–90%) significantly reduce aflatoxin contamination in peanut oil. However, reduced efficacy was observed, with dexification found to be 58% (95% CI: 52%–64%) and a pooled effect size of 77% (95% CI: 67%–87%). One Health strategies also show substantial impact, with the highest effect size of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.81–1.00) through Aflasafe training, followed by integrated agricultural, environmental, and health education (0.70, 95% CI: 0.58–0.82) and health-sector risk awareness (0.68, 95% CI: 0.57–0.79), yielding a pooled effect size of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70–0.80). This review highlights the effectiveness of advanced technologies and One Health strategies in reducing aflatoxin contamination in peanut oil. Combining Aflasafe, ozonation, and One Health approaches offers a promising strategy for both immediate control and sustainable management. Future research should prioritize cost-effective technologies and community-based interventions to enhance impact and scalability, especially in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12418,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fsn3.70062","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.70062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aflatoxin contamination in peanut oil poses significant health, agricultural, and environmental risks. This study assesses the effectiveness of advanced technologies and One Health strategies in mitigating these risks. Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluate the effectiveness of integrated approaches. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (September 2010–September 2024) on aflatoxin mitigation in peanut oil. We included studies involving agricultural, health, and environmental interventions, focusing on Aflasafe, ozonation, and One Health strategies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled effect sizes. Our review of 30 studies, including five meta-analyses, highlights that advanced mitigation methods like Aflasafe (90%, 95% CI: 85%–95%), Ozonation (85%, 95% CI: 70%–95%), and Biological Control (80%, 95% CI: 70%–90%) significantly reduce aflatoxin contamination in peanut oil. However, reduced efficacy was observed, with dexification found to be 58% (95% CI: 52%–64%) and a pooled effect size of 77% (95% CI: 67%–87%). One Health strategies also show substantial impact, with the highest effect size of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.81–1.00) through Aflasafe training, followed by integrated agricultural, environmental, and health education (0.70, 95% CI: 0.58–0.82) and health-sector risk awareness (0.68, 95% CI: 0.57–0.79), yielding a pooled effect size of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70–0.80). This review highlights the effectiveness of advanced technologies and One Health strategies in reducing aflatoxin contamination in peanut oil. Combining Aflasafe, ozonation, and One Health approaches offers a promising strategy for both immediate control and sustainable management. Future research should prioritize cost-effective technologies and community-based interventions to enhance impact and scalability, especially in resource-limited settings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少花生油中黄曲霉毒素污染的有效创新技术和一种健康策略:系统综述和荟萃分析
花生油中的黄曲霉毒素污染对健康、农业和环境造成重大风险。本研究评估了先进技术和“同一个健康”战略在减轻这些风险方面的有效性。通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,我们评估了综合方法的有效性。我们对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science(2010年9月- 2024年9月)关于花生油中黄曲霉毒素减少的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们纳入了涉及农业、健康和环境干预措施的研究,重点是Aflasafe、臭氧化和同一个健康策略。随机效应荟萃分析计算合并效应大小。我们回顾了30项研究,包括5项荟萃分析,强调了先进的缓解方法,如Aflasafe (90%, 95% CI: 85% - 95%)、臭氧化(85%,95% CI: 70%-95%)和生物防治(80%,95% CI: 70%-90%)显著减少了花生油中的黄曲霉毒素污染。然而,观察到疗效降低,dexification发现为58% (95% CI: 52%-64%),合并效应大小为77% (95% CI: 67%-87%)。One Health策略也显示出巨大的影响,通过Aflasafe培训,最高效应值为0.91 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00),其次是综合农业、环境和健康教育(0.70,95% CI: 0.58-0.82)和卫生部门风险意识(0.68,95% CI: 0.57-0.79),总效应值为0.75 (95% CI: 0.70 - 0.80)。本文综述了先进技术和“同一个健康”策略在减少花生油中黄曲霉毒素污染方面的有效性。结合Aflasafe、臭氧化和One Health方法,为即时控制和可持续管理提供了一种有前途的策略。未来的研究应优先考虑具有成本效益的技术和基于社区的干预措施,以增强影响和可扩展性,特别是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science & Nutrition
Food Science & Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
434
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Science & Nutrition is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of food science and nutrition. The Journal will consider submissions of quality papers describing the results of fundamental and applied research related to all aspects of human food and nutrition, as well as interdisciplinary research that spans these two fields.
期刊最新文献
Ameliorative Effects of Lycopene and L-Carnitine on CCl4-Induced Liver Fibrosis Rat Model. Multi-Strain Probiotics BLa80, LRa05, and BBr60 Modulate Inflammation, Bile Acids, and Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Is Acrylamide a Hidden Threat to Muscle Health? Integrative Evidence From Epidemiological and Mechanistic Investigations. Predictive Modeling of Sequential Fermentation for Sustainable Date Vinegar Production From Unripe Kharak Dates. Optimization of Phenolic and Flavonoid Extraction From Bee Bread Using Response Surface Methodology and Central Composite Design, and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1