The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.7326/ANNALS-24-02426
James S Ford, Joseph C Morrison, May Kyaw, Meghan Hewlett, Peggy Tahir, Sonia Jain, Shamim Nemati, Atul Malhotra, Gabriel Wardi
{"title":"The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.","authors":"James S Ford, Joseph C Morrison, May Kyaw, Meghan Hewlett, Peggy Tahir, Sonia Jain, Shamim Nemati, Atul Malhotra, Gabriel Wardi","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) is now included in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the evidence supporting SEP-1 compliance or SEP-1 implementation in improving sepsis mortality.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Library from inception to 26 November 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies of adults with sepsis that included 3- or 6-hour sepsis bundles defined by SEP-1 specifications.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Article screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by 2 authors. Level of evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria and National Quality Forum criteria.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A total of 4403 unique references were screened, and 17 studies were included. Twelve studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 compliance and mortality; 5 showed statistically significant benefit, whereas 7 did not. Among studies showing benefit, 1 did not adjust for confounders, 1 found benefit only among patients with severe sepsis, 1 included only patients with septic shock, and 1 included only Medicare beneficiaries. Five studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 implementation and sepsis mortality; only 1 showed significant benefit, but it did not adjust for mortality trends before SEP-1 implementation. All 17 studies were observational, and none had low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The conclusions are limited by the underlying quality of the available studies, as all were observational. Because there was considerable methodologic heterogeneity among the included studies, a meta-analysis was not performed as the results could have been misleading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found no moderate- or high-level evidence to support that compliance with or implementation of SEP-1 was associated with sepsis mortality. CMS should reconsider the addition of SEP-1 to the Hospital VBP Program.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>None. (PROSPERO: CRD42023482787).</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02426","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) is now included in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program.

Purpose: To assess the evidence supporting SEP-1 compliance or SEP-1 implementation in improving sepsis mortality.

Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Library from inception to 26 November 2024.

Study selection: Studies of adults with sepsis that included 3- or 6-hour sepsis bundles defined by SEP-1 specifications.

Data extraction: Article screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by 2 authors. Level of evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria and National Quality Forum criteria.

Data synthesis: A total of 4403 unique references were screened, and 17 studies were included. Twelve studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 compliance and mortality; 5 showed statistically significant benefit, whereas 7 did not. Among studies showing benefit, 1 did not adjust for confounders, 1 found benefit only among patients with severe sepsis, 1 included only patients with septic shock, and 1 included only Medicare beneficiaries. Five studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 implementation and sepsis mortality; only 1 showed significant benefit, but it did not adjust for mortality trends before SEP-1 implementation. All 17 studies were observational, and none had low risk of bias.

Limitations: The conclusions are limited by the underlying quality of the available studies, as all were observational. Because there was considerable methodologic heterogeneity among the included studies, a meta-analysis was not performed as the results could have been misleading.

Conclusion: This review found no moderate- or high-level evidence to support that compliance with or implementation of SEP-1 was associated with sepsis mortality. CMS should reconsider the addition of SEP-1 to the Hospital VBP Program.

Primary funding source: None. (PROSPERO: CRD42023482787).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Annals Video Summary - De-escalating Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome. Annals Video Summary - The Effect of SEP-1 Bundle Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis. Correction: Severe Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity Among Gestational Carriers. De-escalating Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome : A Systemic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1