The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.
James S Ford, Joseph C Morrison, May Kyaw, Meghan Hewlett, Peggy Tahir, Sonia Jain, Shamim Nemati, Atul Malhotra, Gabriel Wardi
{"title":"The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.","authors":"James S Ford, Joseph C Morrison, May Kyaw, Meghan Hewlett, Peggy Tahir, Sonia Jain, Shamim Nemati, Atul Malhotra, Gabriel Wardi","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) is now included in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the evidence supporting SEP-1 compliance or SEP-1 implementation in improving sepsis mortality.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Library from inception to 26 November 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies of adults with sepsis that included 3- or 6-hour sepsis bundles defined by SEP-1 specifications.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Article screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by 2 authors. Level of evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria and National Quality Forum criteria.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A total of 4403 unique references were screened, and 17 studies were included. Twelve studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 compliance and mortality; 5 showed statistically significant benefit, whereas 7 did not. Among studies showing benefit, 1 did not adjust for confounders, 1 found benefit only among patients with severe sepsis, 1 included only patients with septic shock, and 1 included only Medicare beneficiaries. Five studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 implementation and sepsis mortality; only 1 showed significant benefit, but it did not adjust for mortality trends before SEP-1 implementation. All 17 studies were observational, and none had low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The conclusions are limited by the underlying quality of the available studies, as all were observational. Because there was considerable methodologic heterogeneity among the included studies, a meta-analysis was not performed as the results could have been misleading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found no moderate- or high-level evidence to support that compliance with or implementation of SEP-1 was associated with sepsis mortality. CMS should reconsider the addition of SEP-1 to the Hospital VBP Program.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>None. (PROSPERO: CRD42023482787).</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"543-557"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02426","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) is now included in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program.
Purpose: To assess the evidence supporting SEP-1 compliance or SEP-1 implementation in improving sepsis mortality.
Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Library from inception to 26 November 2024.
Study selection: Studies of adults with sepsis that included 3- or 6-hour sepsis bundles defined by SEP-1 specifications.
Data extraction: Article screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by 2 authors. Level of evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria and National Quality Forum criteria.
Data synthesis: A total of 4403 unique references were screened, and 17 studies were included. Twelve studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 compliance and mortality; 5 showed statistically significant benefit, whereas 7 did not. Among studies showing benefit, 1 did not adjust for confounders, 1 found benefit only among patients with severe sepsis, 1 included only patients with septic shock, and 1 included only Medicare beneficiaries. Five studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 implementation and sepsis mortality; only 1 showed significant benefit, but it did not adjust for mortality trends before SEP-1 implementation. All 17 studies were observational, and none had low risk of bias.
Limitations: The conclusions are limited by the underlying quality of the available studies, as all were observational. Because there was considerable methodologic heterogeneity among the included studies, a meta-analysis was not performed as the results could have been misleading.
Conclusion: This review found no moderate- or high-level evidence to support that compliance with or implementation of SEP-1 was associated with sepsis mortality. CMS should reconsider the addition of SEP-1 to the Hospital VBP Program.
背景:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)严重败血症和感染性休克管理捆绑包(SEP-1)现在被纳入医院基于价值的采购(VBP)计划。目的:评估支持SEP-1依从性或实施SEP-1改善脓毒症死亡率的证据。数据来源:PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library从成立到2024年11月26日。研究选择:成人脓毒症的研究,包括由SEP-1规范定义的3或6小时脓毒症包。数据提取:文章筛选、全文审查、数据提取和偏倚风险评估由2位作者独立完成。证据水平采用GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)标准和国家质量论坛标准确定。数据综合:共筛选4403篇独特文献,纳入17项研究。12项研究评估了SEP-1依从性与死亡率之间的关系;5个显示统计学上显著的益处,而7个没有。在显示获益的研究中,1项没有调整混杂因素,1项仅在严重败血症患者中发现获益,1项仅包括感染性休克患者,1项仅包括医疗保险受益人。五项研究评估了SEP-1实施与败血症死亡率之间的关系;只有1例显示出显著的益处,但在实施SEP-1之前没有调整死亡率趋势。所有17项研究都是观察性的,没有一项具有低偏倚风险。局限性:这些结论受到现有研究的潜在质量的限制,因为所有研究都是观察性的。由于纳入的研究在方法学上存在相当大的异质性,因此未进行荟萃分析,以免结果可能具有误导性。结论:本综述没有发现中等或高水平的证据支持SEP-1的依从性或实施与败血症死亡率相关。CMS应重新考虑将SEP-1纳入医院VBP项目。主要资金来源:无。(普洛斯彼罗:CRD42023482787)。
期刊介绍:
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.