The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.
James S Ford, Joseph C Morrison, May Kyaw, Meghan Hewlett, Peggy Tahir, Sonia Jain, Shamim Nemati, Atul Malhotra, Gabriel Wardi
{"title":"The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.","authors":"James S Ford, Joseph C Morrison, May Kyaw, Meghan Hewlett, Peggy Tahir, Sonia Jain, Shamim Nemati, Atul Malhotra, Gabriel Wardi","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) is now included in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the evidence supporting SEP-1 compliance or SEP-1 implementation in improving sepsis mortality.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Library from inception to 26 November 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies of adults with sepsis that included 3- or 6-hour sepsis bundles defined by SEP-1 specifications.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Article screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by 2 authors. Level of evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria and National Quality Forum criteria.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A total of 4403 unique references were screened, and 17 studies were included. Twelve studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 compliance and mortality; 5 showed statistically significant benefit, whereas 7 did not. Among studies showing benefit, 1 did not adjust for confounders, 1 found benefit only among patients with severe sepsis, 1 included only patients with septic shock, and 1 included only Medicare beneficiaries. Five studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 implementation and sepsis mortality; only 1 showed significant benefit, but it did not adjust for mortality trends before SEP-1 implementation. All 17 studies were observational, and none had low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The conclusions are limited by the underlying quality of the available studies, as all were observational. Because there was considerable methodologic heterogeneity among the included studies, a meta-analysis was not performed as the results could have been misleading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found no moderate- or high-level evidence to support that compliance with or implementation of SEP-1 was associated with sepsis mortality. CMS should reconsider the addition of SEP-1 to the Hospital VBP Program.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>None. (PROSPERO: CRD42023482787).</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02426","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) is now included in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program.
Purpose: To assess the evidence supporting SEP-1 compliance or SEP-1 implementation in improving sepsis mortality.
Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Library from inception to 26 November 2024.
Study selection: Studies of adults with sepsis that included 3- or 6-hour sepsis bundles defined by SEP-1 specifications.
Data extraction: Article screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by 2 authors. Level of evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria and National Quality Forum criteria.
Data synthesis: A total of 4403 unique references were screened, and 17 studies were included. Twelve studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 compliance and mortality; 5 showed statistically significant benefit, whereas 7 did not. Among studies showing benefit, 1 did not adjust for confounders, 1 found benefit only among patients with severe sepsis, 1 included only patients with septic shock, and 1 included only Medicare beneficiaries. Five studies assessed the relationship between SEP-1 implementation and sepsis mortality; only 1 showed significant benefit, but it did not adjust for mortality trends before SEP-1 implementation. All 17 studies were observational, and none had low risk of bias.
Limitations: The conclusions are limited by the underlying quality of the available studies, as all were observational. Because there was considerable methodologic heterogeneity among the included studies, a meta-analysis was not performed as the results could have been misleading.
Conclusion: This review found no moderate- or high-level evidence to support that compliance with or implementation of SEP-1 was associated with sepsis mortality. CMS should reconsider the addition of SEP-1 to the Hospital VBP Program.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.