Radiomics model building from multiparametric MRI to predict Ki-67 expression in patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas: a multicenter study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1186/s12880-025-01585-5
Yelong Shen, Siyu Wu, Yanan Wu, Chao Cui, Haiou Li, Shuang Yang, Xuejun Liu, Xingzhi Chen, Chencui Huang, Ximing Wang
{"title":"Radiomics model building from multiparametric MRI to predict Ki-67 expression in patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas: a multicenter study.","authors":"Yelong Shen, Siyu Wu, Yanan Wu, Chao Cui, Haiou Li, Shuang Yang, Xuejun Liu, Xingzhi Chen, Chencui Huang, Ximing Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01585-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and T1 contrast enhanced (T1-CE) with Ki-67 in primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL). And to assess the diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics-based machine-learning algorithms in differentiating the high proliferation and low proliferation groups of PCNSL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>83 patients with PCNSL were included in this retrospective study. ADC, DWI and T1-CE sequences were collected and their correlation with Ki-67 was examined using Spearman's correlation analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare the survival rates of the high proliferation and low proliferation groups. The radiomics features were extracted respectively, and the features were screened by machine learning algorithm and statistical method. Radiomics models of seven different sequence permutations were constructed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive performance of all models. DeLong test was utilized to compare the differences of models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative mean apparent diffusion coefficient (rADCmean) (ρ=-0.354, p = 0.019), relative mean diffusion weighted imaging (rDWImean) (b = 1000) (ρ = 0.273, p = 0.013) and relative mean T1 contrast enhancement (rT1-CEmean) (ρ = 0.385, p = 0.001) was significantly correlated with Ki-67. Interobserver agreements between the two radiologists were almost perfect for all parameters (rADCmean ICC = 0.978, 95%CI 0.966-0.986; rDWImean (b = 1000) ICC = 0.931, 95% CI 0.895-0.955; rT1-CEmean ICC = 0.969, 95% CI 0.953-0.980). The differences in PFS (p = 0.016) and OS (p = 0.014) between the low and high proliferation groups were statistically significant. The best prediction model in our study used a combination of ADC, DWI, and T1-CE achieving the highest AUC of 0.869, while the second ranked model used ADC and DWI, achieving an AUC of 0.828.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rDWImean, rADCmean and rT1-CEmean were correlated with Ki-67. The radiomics model based on MRI sequences combined is promising to distinguish low proliferation PCNSL from high proliferation PCNSL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01585-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and T1 contrast enhanced (T1-CE) with Ki-67 in primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL). And to assess the diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics-based machine-learning algorithms in differentiating the high proliferation and low proliferation groups of PCNSL.

Methods: 83 patients with PCNSL were included in this retrospective study. ADC, DWI and T1-CE sequences were collected and their correlation with Ki-67 was examined using Spearman's correlation analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare the survival rates of the high proliferation and low proliferation groups. The radiomics features were extracted respectively, and the features were screened by machine learning algorithm and statistical method. Radiomics models of seven different sequence permutations were constructed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive performance of all models. DeLong test was utilized to compare the differences of models.

Results: Relative mean apparent diffusion coefficient (rADCmean) (ρ=-0.354, p = 0.019), relative mean diffusion weighted imaging (rDWImean) (b = 1000) (ρ = 0.273, p = 0.013) and relative mean T1 contrast enhancement (rT1-CEmean) (ρ = 0.385, p = 0.001) was significantly correlated with Ki-67. Interobserver agreements between the two radiologists were almost perfect for all parameters (rADCmean ICC = 0.978, 95%CI 0.966-0.986; rDWImean (b = 1000) ICC = 0.931, 95% CI 0.895-0.955; rT1-CEmean ICC = 0.969, 95% CI 0.953-0.980). The differences in PFS (p = 0.016) and OS (p = 0.014) between the low and high proliferation groups were statistically significant. The best prediction model in our study used a combination of ADC, DWI, and T1-CE achieving the highest AUC of 0.869, while the second ranked model used ADC and DWI, achieving an AUC of 0.828.

Conclusion: rDWImean, rADCmean and rT1-CEmean were correlated with Ki-67. The radiomics model based on MRI sequences combined is promising to distinguish low proliferation PCNSL from high proliferation PCNSL.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多参数MRI建立放射组学模型预测原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤患者Ki-67表达:一项多中心研究。
目的:探讨原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)的表观扩散系数(ADC)、扩散加权成像(DWI)和T1增强(T1- ce)与Ki-67的相关性。并评估基于MRI放射组学的机器学习算法在区分PCNSL高增殖组和低增殖组中的诊断性能。方法:对83例PCNSL患者进行回顾性研究。收集ADC、DWI和T1-CE序列,采用Spearman相关分析检测其与Ki-67的相关性。采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验比较高增殖组和低增殖组的存活率。分别提取放射组学特征,采用机器学习算法和统计学方法对特征进行筛选。构建了7种不同序列排列的放射组学模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC AUC)评价各模型的预测性能。采用DeLong检验比较各模型的差异。结果:相对平均表观扩散系数(rADCmean) (ρ=-0.354, p = 0.019)、相对平均扩散加权成像(rDWImean) (b = 1000) (ρ= 0.273, p = 0.013)和相对平均T1对比度增强(rT1-CEmean) (ρ= 0.385, p = 0.001)与Ki-67有显著相关性。两名放射科医生之间的观察者之间对所有参数的一致性几乎是完美的(rADCmean ICC = 0.978, 95%CI 0.966-0.986;rDWImean (b = 1000) ICC = 0.931, 95% CI 0.895-0.955;rT1-CEmean ICC = 0.969, 95% CI 0.953-0.980)。低增殖组与高增殖组PFS (p = 0.016)、OS (p = 0.014)差异均有统计学意义。我们研究中最好的预测模型使用ADC、DWI和T1-CE的组合,AUC最高,为0.869,排名第二的模型使用ADC和DWI, AUC为0.828。结论:rDWImean、rADCmean、rT1-CEmean与Ki-67相关。基于MRI序列组合的放射组学模型有望区分低增殖PCNSL和高增殖PCNSL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the respiratory function of orthodontic patients. A scoping review. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial strain in patients with coronary slow flow. Multimodal contrastive learning for non-invasive chondroid bone tumor classification and grading using radiographs. Free water in white matter links focal hemodynamic compromise to cognitive impairment in asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of coronary artery calcium score-based and all-coronary computed tomography angiography strategies in patients with stable chest pain and risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood of 5-15.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1