Application of transcriptomics concentration-response modeling for prioritization of contaminants detected in tributaries of the North American Great Lakes.
Jenna E Cavallin, Kendra Bush, Steve Corsi, Laura DeCicco, Kevin Flynn, Alex Kasparek, Monique Hazemi, Erin Maloney, Peter Schumann, Daniel L Villeneuve
{"title":"Application of transcriptomics concentration-response modeling for prioritization of contaminants detected in tributaries of the North American Great Lakes.","authors":"Jenna E Cavallin, Kendra Bush, Steve Corsi, Laura DeCicco, Kevin Flynn, Alex Kasparek, Monique Hazemi, Erin Maloney, Peter Schumann, Daniel L Villeneuve","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, chemical monitoring and surveillance efforts have detected ∼330 chemicals in surface water of Great Lakes tributaries. There were 140 chemicals for which no empirical toxicity data were available. The aim of the present study was to generate transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) for 10 of these compounds and demonstrate how they could be applied in a screening-level prioritization. Organisms representing three trophic levels of the aquatic food-web (P. promelas, D. magna, and R. subcapitata) were exposed for 24 h to a ½-log dilution series of nominal exposure concentrations typically ranging from 66.7 to 0.021 µM of each chemical. In addition to observations of apical effects (e.g., survival and morphology), whole body transcriptomic responses (tPODs) to each chemical were evaluated with targeted analysis using TempO-seq for P. promelas and D. magna and non-targeted RNA-seq for R. subcapitata. The tPODs ranged from 0.18 to 10.8 µM for P. promelas and 0.32 to 29 µM for D. magna, with the most potent of the chemicals tested being fipronil carboxamide for both species. For R. subcapitata, the tPODs ranged from 0.04 to 1.77 µM, with gabapentin as the most potent chemical tested. Empirically derived tPODs from these data-poor chemicals were compared to concentrations detected in the Great Lakes basin. Environmental concentrations were less than the tPODs, except for R. subcapitata and 3,4-dichlorophenyl isocyanate. Similarly, tPODs from previously tested data-rich chemicals were compared with environmental concentrations, in which case tPODs from several chemicals overlapped environmental concentrations. This work demonstrates the potential utility of emerging ecological high-throughput transcriptomics assays to support screening and prioritization of data-poor environmental contaminants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, chemical monitoring and surveillance efforts have detected ∼330 chemicals in surface water of Great Lakes tributaries. There were 140 chemicals for which no empirical toxicity data were available. The aim of the present study was to generate transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) for 10 of these compounds and demonstrate how they could be applied in a screening-level prioritization. Organisms representing three trophic levels of the aquatic food-web (P. promelas, D. magna, and R. subcapitata) were exposed for 24 h to a ½-log dilution series of nominal exposure concentrations typically ranging from 66.7 to 0.021 µM of each chemical. In addition to observations of apical effects (e.g., survival and morphology), whole body transcriptomic responses (tPODs) to each chemical were evaluated with targeted analysis using TempO-seq for P. promelas and D. magna and non-targeted RNA-seq for R. subcapitata. The tPODs ranged from 0.18 to 10.8 µM for P. promelas and 0.32 to 29 µM for D. magna, with the most potent of the chemicals tested being fipronil carboxamide for both species. For R. subcapitata, the tPODs ranged from 0.04 to 1.77 µM, with gabapentin as the most potent chemical tested. Empirically derived tPODs from these data-poor chemicals were compared to concentrations detected in the Great Lakes basin. Environmental concentrations were less than the tPODs, except for R. subcapitata and 3,4-dichlorophenyl isocyanate. Similarly, tPODs from previously tested data-rich chemicals were compared with environmental concentrations, in which case tPODs from several chemicals overlapped environmental concentrations. This work demonstrates the potential utility of emerging ecological high-throughput transcriptomics assays to support screening and prioritization of data-poor environmental contaminants.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.