{"title":"Development and validation of a Japanese outcome tool for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate.","authors":"Yuko Ogata, Masahiro Tezuka, Yuri Fujiwara, Yoshiko Takei, Chihiro Sugiyama, Masayuki Hirose, Akiko Sato, Ako Imamura, Keiko Suzuki, Satoko Imai, Yukari Yamashita, Toko Hayakawa, Sachiyo Hasegawa, Yoko Mizuto","doi":"10.1159/000544775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The lack of a standardized evaluation method for cleft palate speech makes it difficult to exchange information at the domestic and global levels. We aimed to develop and validate a Japanese outcome tool for the perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tool we developed was based on the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented (CAPS-A) with modifications to some speech parameters. We developed Japanese speech samples and parameters for the Japanese Cleft Speech Outcome Tool (CAPS-A-Japan: CAPS-A-JP). This study was conducted in the Japancleft speech working group at the Japanese Cleft Palate Association. In Phase 1, we constructed and developed the speech sampling protocol. In Phase 2, After the revision of the definitions and criteria for several cleft speech characteristics and the speech sample, a total of 20 audio recordings were tested. In Phase 3, criterion validity was assessed by comparing the CAPS-A-JP resonance outcomes reported for 40 cases with the outcomes of the clinical investigations. In Phase 4, a listening experiment with six Japanese speech-language-hearing therapists was conducted twice to test the intra- and inter-rater reliabilities for 20 cases. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to analyze reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean percentage agreement on criterion validity for resonance was 71% on high-pressure sentences but 54% on low-pressure sentences. The inter-rater reliability was rated moderate/good (ICC: 0.45-0.80), except for developmental immaturities/errors that were rated fair. The ICC was very low or incalculable for hyponasality and syllable error patterns because there were few cases of hyponasality and syllable errors. The intra-rater reliability was rated as good/very good. The ICC was very low or incalculable in hyponasality, nasal emission, and syllable error patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The standardized outcome tool, CAPS-A-JP, was developed for the first time in Japan. Future research is required to optimize this tool based on the inclusion of a training protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The lack of a standardized evaluation method for cleft palate speech makes it difficult to exchange information at the domestic and global levels. We aimed to develop and validate a Japanese outcome tool for the perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate.
Methods: The tool we developed was based on the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented (CAPS-A) with modifications to some speech parameters. We developed Japanese speech samples and parameters for the Japanese Cleft Speech Outcome Tool (CAPS-A-Japan: CAPS-A-JP). This study was conducted in the Japancleft speech working group at the Japanese Cleft Palate Association. In Phase 1, we constructed and developed the speech sampling protocol. In Phase 2, After the revision of the definitions and criteria for several cleft speech characteristics and the speech sample, a total of 20 audio recordings were tested. In Phase 3, criterion validity was assessed by comparing the CAPS-A-JP resonance outcomes reported for 40 cases with the outcomes of the clinical investigations. In Phase 4, a listening experiment with six Japanese speech-language-hearing therapists was conducted twice to test the intra- and inter-rater reliabilities for 20 cases. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to analyze reliability.
Results: The mean percentage agreement on criterion validity for resonance was 71% on high-pressure sentences but 54% on low-pressure sentences. The inter-rater reliability was rated moderate/good (ICC: 0.45-0.80), except for developmental immaturities/errors that were rated fair. The ICC was very low or incalculable for hyponasality and syllable error patterns because there were few cases of hyponasality and syllable errors. The intra-rater reliability was rated as good/very good. The ICC was very low or incalculable in hyponasality, nasal emission, and syllable error patterns.
Conclusions: The standardized outcome tool, CAPS-A-JP, was developed for the first time in Japan. Future research is required to optimize this tool based on the inclusion of a training protocol.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.