Toxicity spectrum of taxanes: A safety analysis from pre-marketing to post-marketing.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2464080
Qiuling Zhao, Zilin Nian, Yimin He, Lijun Lai, Wenbin Liu, Shengqiang Huang, Lin Yang
{"title":"Toxicity spectrum of taxanes: A safety analysis from pre-marketing to post-marketing.","authors":"Qiuling Zhao, Zilin Nian, Yimin He, Lijun Lai, Wenbin Liu, Shengqiang Huang, Lin Yang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2464080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As fundamental chemotherapy drugs, paclitaxel and its derivatives are essential for cancer treatment. This analysis comprehensively evalutaed the toxicity spectrum of taxanes from the perspective of clinical trials and the real-world.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Pooled-analyses were performed to estimate incidences of adverse events (AEs) with random-effect models after searching databases. Reports of AEs were retrospectively obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and positive signals were quantified by employing three algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 studies involving 10,828 patients were analyzed in pooled-analysis and 58,835 case reports were retrieved. Leukopenia (59.69, 95% confidence interval 41.34-75.69) and neutropenia (29.69, 23.31-36.99) ranked first among all grades and severe AEs, respectively. Alopecia, regardless of grades, had the highest estimated incidence of non-hematological AEs. The estimated incidences of AEs of Nab-paclitaxel tended to be higher than other formulations, especially neutropenia (46.53, 35.01-58.42). Docetaxel had the least signals but alopecia and depression have quantified several signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety of nab-paclitaxel was beyond expectation and unusual signals of alopecia and depression of docetaxel need to be paid attention to. Results of clinical trials and FAERS indicated consistency between premarket and postmarket studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2464080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As fundamental chemotherapy drugs, paclitaxel and its derivatives are essential for cancer treatment. This analysis comprehensively evalutaed the toxicity spectrum of taxanes from the perspective of clinical trials and the real-world.

Research design and methods: Pooled-analyses were performed to estimate incidences of adverse events (AEs) with random-effect models after searching databases. Reports of AEs were retrospectively obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and positive signals were quantified by employing three algorithms.

Results: A total of 36 studies involving 10,828 patients were analyzed in pooled-analysis and 58,835 case reports were retrieved. Leukopenia (59.69, 95% confidence interval 41.34-75.69) and neutropenia (29.69, 23.31-36.99) ranked first among all grades and severe AEs, respectively. Alopecia, regardless of grades, had the highest estimated incidence of non-hematological AEs. The estimated incidences of AEs of Nab-paclitaxel tended to be higher than other formulations, especially neutropenia (46.53, 35.01-58.42). Docetaxel had the least signals but alopecia and depression have quantified several signals.

Conclusions: The safety of nab-paclitaxel was beyond expectation and unusual signals of alopecia and depression of docetaxel need to be paid attention to. Results of clinical trials and FAERS indicated consistency between premarket and postmarket studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紫杉烷毒性谱:从上市前到上市后的安全性分析。
背景:紫杉醇及其衍生物作为基础化疗药物,在肿瘤治疗中发挥着重要作用。本分析从临床试验和现实世界的角度对紫杉烷类化合物的毒性谱进行了综合评价。研究设计和方法:检索数据库后,采用随机效应模型进行汇总分析,估计不良事件(ae)的发生率。回顾性地从美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中获取不良事件报告,并采用三种算法对阳性信号进行量化。结果:共纳入36项研究,涉及10,828例患者,共检索到58,835例病例报告。白细胞减少(59.69,95%可信区间41.34 ~ 75.69)和中性粒细胞减少(29.69,23.31 ~ 36.99)分别在各等级和严重ae中排名第一。不论级别,脱发的非血液学不良事件发生率最高。nab -紫杉醇的ae估计发生率高于其他剂型,尤其是中性粒细胞减少症(46.53,35.01-58.42)。多西他赛的信号最少,但脱发和抑郁有量化的几个信号。结论:nab-紫杉醇的安全性超出预期,多西紫杉醇的异常脱发和抑郁信号需要引起重视。临床试验和FAERS结果显示上市前和上市后研究的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
GLP-1-derived therapies and risk of sarcopenia: myth or reality? Cardiorenometabolic medicine as a new subspecialty in the light of novel pharmaceuticals with dual or triple benefits. Lessons from examining the safety of drugs for COVID-19 during pregnancy. Who is missing from SGLT-2 inhibitor trials? Implications for drug safety and generalizability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Risk of active tuberculosis and herpes zoster with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in adults with autoimmune disease conditions: a systematic trial sequential analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1