Cultivating crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) significantly enhances the quantity and diversity of soil microorganisms: evidence from the comparison of rice-wheat and rice-crayfish rotation models.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1528883
Hui Xu, Dan Wang, Xuguang Li, Jiajia Li, Yu Xu, Zhiqiang Xu
{"title":"Cultivating crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) significantly enhances the quantity and diversity of soil microorganisms: evidence from the comparison of rice-wheat and rice-crayfish rotation models.","authors":"Hui Xu, Dan Wang, Xuguang Li, Jiajia Li, Yu Xu, Zhiqiang Xu","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1528883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrated farming of rice (IFA), as a time-honored agricultural model, can effectively increase agricultural productivity and provide ecological benefits. Rice-wheat rotation and rice-crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) rotation are two most widely applied IFA patterns in China. In this study, we compared the differences in soil microbial communities and predicted their functions in these two IFA models by sequencing the 16s rRNA and analyzing the bioinformation. The results showed that crayfish farming effectively increased the abundance and diversity of soil microorganisms. The main differentially abundant phyla between the two groups were Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, and Desulfobacterota, while the main differentially abundant genera were <i>Bacteroidetes_vadinHA17</i>, <i>Sphingomonas</i>, and <i>Thiobacillus</i>. The Similarity Percentages (SIMPER) analysis indicated that these species also had the highest contribution to the differences in microbial composition between the two groups. Random forest prediction analysis was employed to identify potential biomarkers to distinguish the two microbial communities. Actinobacteriota, Desulfobacterota, and Spirochaetota were identified as potential biomarker phyla. <i>Streptomyces</i>, <i>Kribbella</i>, and <i>Paludibacter</i> could serve as potential biomarker genera. Functional Annotation of Prokaryotic Taxa (FAPROTAX) analysis revealed that the dominant bacterial functions in the rice-wheat rotation model were aerobic chemoheterotrophy and chemoheterotrophy. In contrast, the bacterial functions in the rice-crayfish rotation model were more diverse, primarily including methylotrophy, human pathogens all and methanotrophy. The results of co-occurrence network analysis showed that crayfish farming enhanced the modularity of the soil microbial community, and revealed that the microbial network in rice-wheat soil had fewer nodes and more edges, which implying more internal connections. In conclusion, the wheat planting and crayfish farming drove significant differences in the soil microbial communities of paddy fields, with Actinobacteriota and Desulfobacterota identified as potential biomarkers. Compared to wheat cultivation, the rotation system incorporating crayfish farming enhanced the richness and diversity of soil microbial species and functions, increased the modularity of the microbial community, and promoted the presence of keystone species with connecting roles. Our study would not only clarify the effects of different IFA models on soil microbial communities, and should also provide valuable insights for future adjusting cropping patterns and controlling current soil microbial ecological problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1528883"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1528883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrated farming of rice (IFA), as a time-honored agricultural model, can effectively increase agricultural productivity and provide ecological benefits. Rice-wheat rotation and rice-crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) rotation are two most widely applied IFA patterns in China. In this study, we compared the differences in soil microbial communities and predicted their functions in these two IFA models by sequencing the 16s rRNA and analyzing the bioinformation. The results showed that crayfish farming effectively increased the abundance and diversity of soil microorganisms. The main differentially abundant phyla between the two groups were Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, and Desulfobacterota, while the main differentially abundant genera were Bacteroidetes_vadinHA17, Sphingomonas, and Thiobacillus. The Similarity Percentages (SIMPER) analysis indicated that these species also had the highest contribution to the differences in microbial composition between the two groups. Random forest prediction analysis was employed to identify potential biomarkers to distinguish the two microbial communities. Actinobacteriota, Desulfobacterota, and Spirochaetota were identified as potential biomarker phyla. Streptomyces, Kribbella, and Paludibacter could serve as potential biomarker genera. Functional Annotation of Prokaryotic Taxa (FAPROTAX) analysis revealed that the dominant bacterial functions in the rice-wheat rotation model were aerobic chemoheterotrophy and chemoheterotrophy. In contrast, the bacterial functions in the rice-crayfish rotation model were more diverse, primarily including methylotrophy, human pathogens all and methanotrophy. The results of co-occurrence network analysis showed that crayfish farming enhanced the modularity of the soil microbial community, and revealed that the microbial network in rice-wheat soil had fewer nodes and more edges, which implying more internal connections. In conclusion, the wheat planting and crayfish farming drove significant differences in the soil microbial communities of paddy fields, with Actinobacteriota and Desulfobacterota identified as potential biomarkers. Compared to wheat cultivation, the rotation system incorporating crayfish farming enhanced the richness and diversity of soil microbial species and functions, increased the modularity of the microbial community, and promoted the presence of keystone species with connecting roles. Our study would not only clarify the effects of different IFA models on soil microbial communities, and should also provide valuable insights for future adjusting cropping patterns and controlling current soil microbial ecological problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Brucella osteoarthritis: recent progress and future directions. Age-related immune response disparities between adults and children with severe COVID-19: a case-control study in China. Cecum microbiota composition, fermentation characteristics, and immunometabolic biomarkers of Yunshang black goat fed varying dietary energy and protein levels. Exploring the recombinant evolution and hosts of crucivirus based on novel oyster-associated viruses. Identification of disease-specific gut microbial markers in vitiligo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1