Prognostic impact of primary surgery in human papillomavirus-independent, advanced or metastatic endocervical adenocarcinoma: A bi-institutional retrospective study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.70028
Jun-Hyeong Seo, Tyan-Shin Yang, Hyun-Soo Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Yen-Ling Lai, Jung Chen, Yu-Li Chen, Yoo-Young Lee
{"title":"Prognostic impact of primary surgery in human papillomavirus-independent, advanced or metastatic endocervical adenocarcinoma: A bi-institutional retrospective study","authors":"Jun-Hyeong Seo,&nbsp;Tyan-Shin Yang,&nbsp;Hyun-Soo Kim,&nbsp;Won Kyung Cho,&nbsp;Yen-Ling Lai,&nbsp;Jung Chen,&nbsp;Yu-Li Chen,&nbsp;Yoo-Young Lee","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the prognostic impact of primary surgery on patients with HPV-independent, advanced or metastatic endocervical adenocarcinoma (EAC) who typically exhibit poor survival outcomes and resistance to conventional therapies such as chemoradiotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A bi-institutional retrospective study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center and Taiwan National University Hospital. Between 2001 and 2023, 92 patients with HPV-independent advanced or metastatic EAC were included. Patients were divided into two groups: 54 (58.7%) underwent primary surgery and 38 (41.3%) received non-surgical treatments, including definitive radiotherapy or palliative chemotherapy. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The surgery group demonstrated significantly improved outcomes, with a median PFS of 19.2 months, compared with 10.0 months in the non-surgery group (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Median OS was not reached in the surgery group, whereas it was 24.1 months in the non-surgery group (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that non-surgical treatment was an independent predictor of poor PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–4.29; <i>P</i> = 0.013) and OS (HR 3.25; 95% CI 1.37–7.73; <i>P</i> = 0.008). Additionally, the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the surgery group (55.6%) than in the non-surgery group (84.2%; <i>P</i> = 0.006).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Primary surgery significantly improves survival outcomes in patients with HPV-independent advanced or metastatic EAC. These findings suggest that surgery should be considered as part of a multimodal treatment strategy for this aggressive subtype, highlighting the need for individualized therapeutic approaches beyond standard chemoradiotherapy protocols.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":"170 1","pages":"250-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic impact of primary surgery on patients with HPV-independent, advanced or metastatic endocervical adenocarcinoma (EAC) who typically exhibit poor survival outcomes and resistance to conventional therapies such as chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

A bi-institutional retrospective study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center and Taiwan National University Hospital. Between 2001 and 2023, 92 patients with HPV-independent advanced or metastatic EAC were included. Patients were divided into two groups: 54 (58.7%) underwent primary surgery and 38 (41.3%) received non-surgical treatments, including definitive radiotherapy or palliative chemotherapy. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results

The surgery group demonstrated significantly improved outcomes, with a median PFS of 19.2 months, compared with 10.0 months in the non-surgery group (P < 0.001). Median OS was not reached in the surgery group, whereas it was 24.1 months in the non-surgery group (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that non-surgical treatment was an independent predictor of poor PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–4.29; P = 0.013) and OS (HR 3.25; 95% CI 1.37–7.73; P = 0.008). Additionally, the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the surgery group (55.6%) than in the non-surgery group (84.2%; P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Primary surgery significantly improves survival outcomes in patients with HPV-independent advanced or metastatic EAC. These findings suggest that surgery should be considered as part of a multimodal treatment strategy for this aggressive subtype, highlighting the need for individualized therapeutic approaches beyond standard chemoradiotherapy protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性手术对不依赖人乳头瘤病毒、晚期或转移性宫颈内膜腺癌预后的影响:一项双机构回顾性研究
目的:评估原发性手术对不依赖hpv、晚期或转移性宫颈内膜腺癌(EAC)患者预后的影响,这些患者通常表现出较差的生存结果和对常规治疗(如放化疗)的耐药性。​在2001年至2023年期间,纳入了92例hpv非依赖性晚期或转移性EAC患者。患者分为两组:54例(58.7%)接受了初始手术,38例(41.3%)接受了非手术治疗,包括最终放疗或姑息性化疗。Kaplan-Meier分析比较各组间无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。进行多变量分析以确定独立的预后因素。结果:手术组的预后显著改善,中位PFS为19.2个月,而非手术组的中位PFS为10.0个月(P结论:原发性手术显著改善了不依赖hpv的晚期或转移性EAC患者的生存结果。这些发现表明,对于这种侵袭性亚型,手术应被视为多模式治疗策略的一部分,突出了标准放化疗方案之外个性化治疗方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Polycystic ovarian syndrome and perinatal outcomes: A population-based pooled cross-sectional study. The impact of advanced maternal age on the risk of perineal and anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women. Policy and advocacy considerations for the prevention and care of preterm birth. Impact of junctional zone adenomyosis on reproductive outcomes after first single embryo transfer with donated oocytes: A retrospective single-center cohort study. Influence of maternal body mass index on the accuracy of clinical and sonographic fetal weight estimation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1