Flow diversion in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the novel FRED X device: An early experience from a single high-volume center.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1177/15910199251319059
Thomas Mandel Clausen, Ryan Nakamura, Andie Conching, Joo Won Choi, Yi Jonathan Zhang, Ferdinand Hui, Samuel Tsappidi
{"title":"Flow diversion in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the novel FRED X device: An early experience from a single high-volume center.","authors":"Thomas Mandel Clausen, Ryan Nakamura, Andie Conching, Joo Won Choi, Yi Jonathan Zhang, Ferdinand Hui, Samuel Tsappidi","doi":"10.1177/15910199251319059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device X (FRED X) offers several benefits over other flow-diverter devices including an antithrombotic coating, optimized in-vessel stability, and increased flexibility for easier device placement. We present a to-date experience of the safety and utility of the FRED X device in the repair of posterior and anterior circulation aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on all endovascular procedures that utilized the FRED X device at our center from May 2022 to November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 patients (72.7% women, mean age 58.9), underwent a total of 85 procedures using the FRED X device. Indications included treatment of incidentally discovered aneurysms, acute dissections, aneurysm rupture, repair of residual filling following prior intervention, and use of FRED X for recanalization of non-aneurysmal extracranial stroke. 31.3% of the aneurysms were in the posterior circulation, 68.7% were in the anterior circulation. 9.4% of patients presented with SAH due to acute aneurysm rupture. Patients treated with FRED X were separated into OFF-Label (40.0%) or ON-label (60.0%) indications. Occlusion rate at 6-month follow-up were 72.2% in the OFF-label group, 66.7% in the ON-label group, and 68.4% overall. Rate of major periprocedural complications was 1.2% and the cumulative rate of postprocedural complication at follow-up was 5.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that FRED X treatment of intracranial aneurysms is safe in both OFF-label and ON-label indications. Continued follow-up of our patient population will further establish the safety, efficacy, and long-term stability of this device.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251319059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251319059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device X (FRED X) offers several benefits over other flow-diverter devices including an antithrombotic coating, optimized in-vessel stability, and increased flexibility for easier device placement. We present a to-date experience of the safety and utility of the FRED X device in the repair of posterior and anterior circulation aneurysms.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all endovascular procedures that utilized the FRED X device at our center from May 2022 to November 2023.

Results: 77 patients (72.7% women, mean age 58.9), underwent a total of 85 procedures using the FRED X device. Indications included treatment of incidentally discovered aneurysms, acute dissections, aneurysm rupture, repair of residual filling following prior intervention, and use of FRED X for recanalization of non-aneurysmal extracranial stroke. 31.3% of the aneurysms were in the posterior circulation, 68.7% were in the anterior circulation. 9.4% of patients presented with SAH due to acute aneurysm rupture. Patients treated with FRED X were separated into OFF-Label (40.0%) or ON-label (60.0%) indications. Occlusion rate at 6-month follow-up were 72.2% in the OFF-label group, 66.7% in the ON-label group, and 68.4% overall. Rate of major periprocedural complications was 1.2% and the cumulative rate of postprocedural complication at follow-up was 5.3%.

Conclusion: This study shows that FRED X treatment of intracranial aneurysms is safe in both OFF-label and ON-label indications. Continued follow-up of our patient population will further establish the safety, efficacy, and long-term stability of this device.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Endovascular flow diversion reconstruction of petrocervical dissections with the proximal anchoring technique: Experience in 31 consecutive cases. Flow diversion in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the novel FRED X device: An early experience from a single high-volume center. Venous sinus stenting for management of spontaneous skull-base CSF leaks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis: A cohort study of 325 patients. The foreseeable potential of robotics in neurointervention: Current robotic systems and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1