Commissioning of Halcyon enhanced leaf model in the Eclipse treatment planning system: Focus on simple slit fields and VMAT dose calculation

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/acm2.70044
Ryohei Miyasaka, Mari Shirai, Mitsunobu Igari, Yume Kojima, Yuki Kozawa, Toru Kawachi, Ryusuke Hara
{"title":"Commissioning of Halcyon enhanced leaf model in the Eclipse treatment planning system: Focus on simple slit fields and VMAT dose calculation","authors":"Ryohei Miyasaka,&nbsp;Mari Shirai,&nbsp;Mitsunobu Igari,&nbsp;Yume Kojima,&nbsp;Yuki Kozawa,&nbsp;Toru Kawachi,&nbsp;Ryusuke Hara","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) in Halcyon adds complexities to the dose calculation process owing to the variability of dosimetric characteristics with leaf motion. Recently, an enhanced leaf model (ELM) was developed to refine the MLC model in the Eclipse treatment planning system. This study investigates the performance of the Halcyon ELM by verifying doses for simple slit fields and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>Dose calculations were performed with Acuros XB using the ELM. To commission the leaf–tip model, the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was calculated (referred to as DLG<sub>ELM</sub>) and compared with Halcyon measurements. The DLGs were assessed under conditions both with and without leaf trailing between the MLC layers. The tongue-and-groove (TG) model was evaluated by comparing leaf–edge profiles and the outputs of the asynchronous sweeping gap. Furthermore, eleven VMAT plans were validated against chamber doses and Delta4 measurements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>DLG<sub>ELM</sub> demonstrated variation between layers, measuring 0.42 mm for the proximal layer and 0.23 mm for the distal layer, and showed a correspondence with the measured DLGs in 0.1 mm. Additionally, ELM reduced the discrepancy between calculated and measured DLGs when accounting for leaf trailing. In the TG model test, ELM calculations successfully mirrored the measured leaf–edge profiles. Moreover, the median dose difference between ELM calculations and chamber doses was −0.8% in asynchronous sweeping gaps. In the VMAT dose verification, the incorporation of ELM enhanced the target dose and resulted in a gamma pass rate (2%/2 mm) exceeding 95%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Halcyon ELM considerably improved the accuracy of simulating actual leaf–tip transmission, both with and without leaf trailing, and it effectively accounted for the additional blocking caused by TG design. Furthermore, the introduction of ELM in Eclipse considerably enhanced the VMAT dose calculation. ELM addresses the limitations of traditional leaf models and reduces uncertainties in Halcyon dose calculations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) in Halcyon adds complexities to the dose calculation process owing to the variability of dosimetric characteristics with leaf motion. Recently, an enhanced leaf model (ELM) was developed to refine the MLC model in the Eclipse treatment planning system. This study investigates the performance of the Halcyon ELM by verifying doses for simple slit fields and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans.

Materials and methods

Dose calculations were performed with Acuros XB using the ELM. To commission the leaf–tip model, the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was calculated (referred to as DLGELM) and compared with Halcyon measurements. The DLGs were assessed under conditions both with and without leaf trailing between the MLC layers. The tongue-and-groove (TG) model was evaluated by comparing leaf–edge profiles and the outputs of the asynchronous sweeping gap. Furthermore, eleven VMAT plans were validated against chamber doses and Delta4 measurements.

Results

DLGELM demonstrated variation between layers, measuring 0.42 mm for the proximal layer and 0.23 mm for the distal layer, and showed a correspondence with the measured DLGs in 0.1 mm. Additionally, ELM reduced the discrepancy between calculated and measured DLGs when accounting for leaf trailing. In the TG model test, ELM calculations successfully mirrored the measured leaf–edge profiles. Moreover, the median dose difference between ELM calculations and chamber doses was −0.8% in asynchronous sweeping gaps. In the VMAT dose verification, the incorporation of ELM enhanced the target dose and resulted in a gamma pass rate (2%/2 mm) exceeding 95%.

Conclusion

Halcyon ELM considerably improved the accuracy of simulating actual leaf–tip transmission, both with and without leaf trailing, and it effectively accounted for the additional blocking caused by TG design. Furthermore, the introduction of ELM in Eclipse considerably enhanced the VMAT dose calculation. ELM addresses the limitations of traditional leaf models and reduces uncertainties in Halcyon dose calculations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Halcyon增强叶片模型在Eclipse治疗计划系统中的调试:重点关注简单狭缝场和VMAT剂量计算。
目的:Halcyon的双层多叶准直仪(MLC)由于剂量学特性随叶片运动的变化而变化,增加了剂量计算过程的复杂性。最近,开发了一个增强的叶片模型(ELM)来改进Eclipse处理计划系统中的MLC模型。本研究通过验证简单狭缝场和体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)计划的剂量来研究Halcyon ELM的性能。材料和方法:使用ELM用acros XB进行剂量计算。为了启用叶尖模型,计算了剂量学叶间隙(DLG)(称为DLGELM),并与Halcyon测量值进行了比较。在MLC层间有和没有叶片拖尾的情况下,对DLGs进行了评估。通过比较叶片边缘轮廓和异步扫隙输出,对舌槽模型进行了评价。此外,11个VMAT计划根据室剂量和Delta4测量值进行了验证。结果:DLGELM表现出层间差异,近端为0.42 mm,远端为0.23 mm,与测量的DLGs在0.1 mm处对应。此外,ELM还减少了计算和测量的dlg之间的差异。在热重模型试验中,ELM计算成功地反映了测量的叶边缘轮廓。此外,在异步扫描间隙中,ELM计算与腔室剂量之间的中位剂量差为-0.8%。在VMAT剂量验证中,ELM的掺入增强了目标剂量,导致γ通过率(2%/ 2mm)超过95%。结论:Halcyon ELM在有叶和无叶拖尾情况下均能显著提高模拟实际叶尖传输的准确性,有效地弥补了TG设计造成的额外阻塞。此外,在Eclipse中引入ELM大大增强了VMAT剂量的计算。ELM解决了传统叶片模型的局限性,并减少了Halcyon剂量计算中的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
期刊最新文献
Developing an automatic decision-assistance tool to choose proton/photon radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer Quantitative analysis of robustness-based versus LET-based optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for pediatric brain tumors Evaluation of the InTempo path set for CyberKnife prostate and lung SBRT: A single-institution experience RapidArc Dynamic (RAD) multi-mechanical axis optimization achieves enhanced OAR sparing in cervical cancer: A dosimetric comparison study An optimized VMAT planning technique for hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1