Predictors of early disability accumulation in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis: clinical, imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measures.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2024-335037
Markus Lauerer, Tun Wiltgen, Carolin Brückner, Christina Engl, Katrin Giglhuber, Sebastian Lambrecht, Viola Pongratz, Achim Berthele, Christiane Gasperi, Jan S Kirschke, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Hemmer, Mark Mühlau
{"title":"Predictors of early disability accumulation in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis: clinical, imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measures.","authors":"Markus Lauerer, Tun Wiltgen, Carolin Brückner, Christina Engl, Katrin Giglhuber, Sebastian Lambrecht, Viola Pongratz, Achim Berthele, Christiane Gasperi, Jan S Kirschke, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Hemmer, Mark Mühlau","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2024-335037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A growing arsenal of treatment options for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) emphasises the need for early prognostic biomarkers. While evidence for individual markers exists, comprehensive analyses at the time of diagnosis are sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brain and spinal cord lesion numbers, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, initial symptoms, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score were determined at the time of diagnosis. Confirmed disability accumulation (CDA), defined as a sustained EDSS increase over 6 months, was determined during a 5-year follow-up. All-subsets multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of CDA. Model performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic analysis, and individual risks were calculated. Analyses were repeated with progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) as an outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>113/417 (27.1%) people with RMS experienced CDA on follow-up. Intrathecal IgG synthesis, a higher number of spinal cord lesions, age and polysymptomatic manifestation were identified as independent predictors of CDA. The resulting prediction model yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 with a 95% CI of 0.70 to 0.80. Individuals exceeding the optimal thresholds for the three most significant predictors had a 61.8% likelihood of experiencing CDA, whereas those below all three thresholds had a CDA rate of 4.5%. The only significant baseline predictor differentiating PIRA from relapse-associated worsening was a higher number of spinal cord lesions (AUC=0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrathecal IgG synthesis, spinal cord lesion number, age and polysymptomatic manifestation are independent predictors of early CDA in newly diagnosed RMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"900-907"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-335037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A growing arsenal of treatment options for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) emphasises the need for early prognostic biomarkers. While evidence for individual markers exists, comprehensive analyses at the time of diagnosis are sparse.

Methods: Brain and spinal cord lesion numbers, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, initial symptoms, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score were determined at the time of diagnosis. Confirmed disability accumulation (CDA), defined as a sustained EDSS increase over 6 months, was determined during a 5-year follow-up. All-subsets multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of CDA. Model performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic analysis, and individual risks were calculated. Analyses were repeated with progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) as an outcome.

Results: 113/417 (27.1%) people with RMS experienced CDA on follow-up. Intrathecal IgG synthesis, a higher number of spinal cord lesions, age and polysymptomatic manifestation were identified as independent predictors of CDA. The resulting prediction model yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 with a 95% CI of 0.70 to 0.80. Individuals exceeding the optimal thresholds for the three most significant predictors had a 61.8% likelihood of experiencing CDA, whereas those below all three thresholds had a CDA rate of 4.5%. The only significant baseline predictor differentiating PIRA from relapse-associated worsening was a higher number of spinal cord lesions (AUC=0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74).

Conclusions: Intrathecal IgG synthesis, spinal cord lesion number, age and polysymptomatic manifestation are independent predictors of early CDA in newly diagnosed RMS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新诊断多发性硬化症早期残疾积累的预测因素:临床、影像学和脑脊液测量
背景:复发性多发性硬化症(RMS)的治疗选择越来越多,这强调了对早期预后生物标志物的需求。虽然存在个体标记物的证据,但诊断时的综合分析很少。方法:在诊断时测定脑和脊髓病变数、脑脊液参数、初始症状和扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评分。确认的残疾积累(CDA),定义为EDSS持续增加超过6个月,在5年随访期间确定。采用全子集多变量logistic回归来确定CDA的预测因子。通过受试者操作特征分析评估模型性能,并计算个体风险。以独立于复发活动的进展(PIRA)作为结果重复分析。结果:417例RMS患者中有113例(27.1%)出现CDA。鞘内IgG合成、较高数量的脊髓病变、年龄和多症状表现被认为是CDA的独立预测因素。所得预测模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.75,95% CI为0.70至0.80。超过三个最重要预测指标的最佳阈值的个体经历CDA的可能性为61.8%,而低于三个阈值的个体的CDA率为4.5%。区分PIRA与复发相关恶化的唯一重要基线预测指标是脊髓病变数量较多(AUC=0.64, 95% CI 0.54至0.74)。结论:鞘内IgG合成、脊髓病变数量、年龄和多症状表现是新诊断RMS早期CDA的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
期刊最新文献
Defining Alzheimer's disease: stipulations and the ethics of diagnostic change. Genetic risk in a warming world. Genetic susceptibility to heat identifies rare neurological diseases at particular risk from climate change impacts. Heterozygous variants in SLC12A6 should be considered in all cases of suspected inherited neuropathy. Beneficial impact of physical activity on multiple sclerosis disability progression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1