Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: A comparative analysis of permeability quantification based on K trans and PS.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/mrm.30446
Denisa Hývlová, Radovan Jiřík, Jiří Vitouš, Ondřej Macíček, Lucie Krátká, Eva Dražanová, Zenon Starčuk
{"title":"<ArticleTitle xmlns:ns0=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\">Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: A comparative analysis of permeability quantification based on <ns0:math> <ns0:mrow> <ns0:msup><ns0:mrow><ns0:mi>K</ns0:mi></ns0:mrow> <ns0:mrow><ns0:mtext>trans</ns0:mtext></ns0:mrow> </ns0:msup> </ns0:mrow> </ns0:math> and PS.","authors":"Denisa Hývlová, Radovan Jiřík, Jiří Vitouš, Ondřej Macíček, Lucie Krátká, Eva Dražanová, Zenon Starčuk","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is a promising method for neurotherapeutic delivery. The standard for quantifying induced BBB permeability is the <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> parameter, which reflects both permeability and plasma flow. The influence of plasma flow can be eliminated by estimating the PS parameter. However, this parameter has been largely unexplored in this application. This study aims to compare permeability estimates based on <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and PS in focused ultrasound-induced BBB opening experiments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the extended Tofts model (ETM) and the two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) to estimate <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and PS parameters, respectively. Permeability estimates were compared using simulated concentration curves, simulated DCE-MRI data, and real datasets. We explored the influence of spatially-regularized model fitting on the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For opened BBB, <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> was minimally influenced by plasma flow under the tested conditions. However, fitting the ETM often introduced outliers in <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> estimates in regions with closed BBB. The 2CXM outperformed the ETM at high signal-to-noise ratios, but its higher complexity led to lower precision at low signal-to-noise ratios. Both these issues were successfully compensated by spatially-regularized model fitting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and PS seem to be eligible options for the quantification of BBB opening, and the correct choice depends on the specifics of the acquired DCE-MRI data. Additionally, spatial regularization has demonstrated its importance in enhancing the accuracy and reproducibility of results for both models.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is a promising method for neurotherapeutic delivery. The standard for quantifying induced BBB permeability is the K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ parameter, which reflects both permeability and plasma flow. The influence of plasma flow can be eliminated by estimating the PS parameter. However, this parameter has been largely unexplored in this application. This study aims to compare permeability estimates based on K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ and PS in focused ultrasound-induced BBB opening experiments.

Methods: We used the extended Tofts model (ETM) and the two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) to estimate K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ and PS parameters, respectively. Permeability estimates were compared using simulated concentration curves, simulated DCE-MRI data, and real datasets. We explored the influence of spatially-regularized model fitting on the results.

Results: For opened BBB, K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ was minimally influenced by plasma flow under the tested conditions. However, fitting the ETM often introduced outliers in K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ estimates in regions with closed BBB. The 2CXM outperformed the ETM at high signal-to-noise ratios, but its higher complexity led to lower precision at low signal-to-noise ratios. Both these issues were successfully compensated by spatially-regularized model fitting.

Conclusion: Both K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ and PS seem to be eligible options for the quantification of BBB opening, and the correct choice depends on the specifics of the acquired DCE-MRI data. Additionally, spatial regularization has demonstrated its importance in enhancing the accuracy and reproducibility of results for both models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Whole liver phase-based R2 mapping in liver iron overload within a breath-hold. Whole-brain BOLD responses to graded hypoxic challenges at 7 T, 9.4 T, and 15.2 T: Implications for ultrahigh-field functional MRI and BOLD-dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: A comparative analysis of permeability quantification based on K trans and PS. A data-driven approach for improved quantification of in vivo metabolic conversion rates of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Amide mapping in the human brain using downfield MRSI at 3 T and 7 T.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1