Methodology of a Social Network Survey in Primary Care Practices With Medical Home Attributes.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1097/JAC.0000000000000520
Justinna Dixon, Eleanor Turi, Madeline Pollifrone, Kyle Featherston, Jianfang Liu, Grant Martsolf, Lusine Poghosyan
{"title":"Methodology of a Social Network Survey in Primary Care Practices With Medical Home Attributes.","authors":"Justinna Dixon, Eleanor Turi, Madeline Pollifrone, Kyle Featherston, Jianfang Liu, Grant Martsolf, Lusine Poghosyan","doi":"10.1097/JAC.0000000000000520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide an overview of the methods of a social network survey used to collect data in primary care practices on team structures, compositions, and social networks (eg, support, communication).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional sociometric social network survey in 23 primary care practices with medical home attributes in New York and Pennsylvania was conducted. All primary care providers (ie, physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants), clinical staff (eg, registered nurses, social workers, and nutritionists, etc), and administrative staff (eg, practice managers, office assistants, etc) in each practice were eligible to participate in the online survey. All practice members received an online survey asking them to identify who they work with during a typical week. Data were collected about the characteristics of respondent's relationships with each identified team member, perceived team effectiveness, and respondent-level job satisfaction, intent to leave, burnout, and demographics. We calculated the overall response rate and compared it among practices with different practice sizes and respondent roles using chi-square tests and independent samples t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey yielded an average response rate of 51.8%, with a range between 21.8% and 82.3% across the practices. Three hundred ninety-four primary care providers, 222 clinical staff, and 173 administrative staff responded to the survey. Respondents (n = 792) were more likely to be from smaller practices and be administrative or clinical staff rather than providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This social network survey of primary care providers and staff used innovative approaches to collect data on team structures beyond traditional methods. Despite declining response rates in healthcare provider surveys, our survey reached high response rates in several practices. Future studies should find ways to engage primary care providers and staff in survey research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46654,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","volume":" ","pages":"84-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide an overview of the methods of a social network survey used to collect data in primary care practices on team structures, compositions, and social networks (eg, support, communication).

Methods: A cross-sectional sociometric social network survey in 23 primary care practices with medical home attributes in New York and Pennsylvania was conducted. All primary care providers (ie, physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants), clinical staff (eg, registered nurses, social workers, and nutritionists, etc), and administrative staff (eg, practice managers, office assistants, etc) in each practice were eligible to participate in the online survey. All practice members received an online survey asking them to identify who they work with during a typical week. Data were collected about the characteristics of respondent's relationships with each identified team member, perceived team effectiveness, and respondent-level job satisfaction, intent to leave, burnout, and demographics. We calculated the overall response rate and compared it among practices with different practice sizes and respondent roles using chi-square tests and independent samples t-tests.

Results: The survey yielded an average response rate of 51.8%, with a range between 21.8% and 82.3% across the practices. Three hundred ninety-four primary care providers, 222 clinical staff, and 173 administrative staff responded to the survey. Respondents (n = 792) were more likely to be from smaller practices and be administrative or clinical staff rather than providers.

Conclusion: This social network survey of primary care providers and staff used innovative approaches to collect data on team structures beyond traditional methods. Despite declining response rates in healthcare provider surveys, our survey reached high response rates in several practices. Future studies should find ways to engage primary care providers and staff in survey research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management is a PEER-REVIEWED journal that provides timely, applied information on the most important developments and issues in ambulatory care management.
期刊最新文献
Frontline Clinic Administrator Perspectives on Extreme Weather Events, Clinic Operations, and Climate Resilience. Characteristics of Persons Using Convenience Clinics for Usual Care in 2022. Methodology of a Social Network Survey in Primary Care Practices With Medical Home Attributes. Moving Beyond Viral Suppression: Strengthening the Community HIV Workforce to Improve Empowerment and Reduce Stigma in the Memphis Transitional Grant Area. The Experiences of Health Care Providers Serving Under-Resourced Patients With Chronic Disease Through an Interprofessional Model of Care in the Southeastern United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1