Effect of Coaching on Trainee Burnout, Professional Fulfillment, and Errors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005999
Ritika S Parris, Zhiyong Dong, Alicia Clark, Margaret M Hayes, Amy M Sullivan, Carrie Tibbles, Kerri Palamara
{"title":"Effect of Coaching on Trainee Burnout, Professional Fulfillment, and Errors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ritika S Parris, Zhiyong Dong, Alicia Clark, Margaret M Hayes, Amy M Sullivan, Carrie Tibbles, Kerri Palamara","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the effect of coaching on errors and burnout on graduate medical education trainees and mechanisms of this effect.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial at a large, urban academic medical center, trainees and faculty were randomized to coaching with mentorship or mentorship alone from September 2021 to December 2022. Trainees randomized to coaching (coachees) were paired with faculty coaches from different specialties, who were trained in a novel coaching curriculum. Burnout was measured with the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index subscales of professional fulfillment, work exhaustion, interpersonal disengagement, and overall burnout. Medical errors in the past 3 months were self-reported. Focus groups were conducted for each of the 4 cohorts (faculty control, faculty intervention, trainee control, and trainee intervention) to allow for an in-depth exploration of the coaching program experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 184 trainees and 150 faculty were randomized to standard mentorship with or without coaching. Paired analysis included 83 trainees (59% female) and 77 faculty (60% female). Difference-in-difference analyses showed reduced burnout among coachees compared with control trainees, with a score difference of -0.37 (95% CI, -0.64 to -0.09). Professional fulfillment improved in coachees, with a score difference of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.16-0.83) compared with control trainees. There were no significant differences in resilience or self-valuation. Coachees had 2.18 times greater odds of reporting no medical error than control trainees (not significant) and were less likely to report being \"unsure\" about medical error involvement. Qualitative analysis highlighted the importance of specialty discordance in coaching pairs and a coach's holistic awareness of coachee well-being and demonstrated successful uptake and use of coaching skills, particularly positive reframing and normalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coaching improved trainee burnout and professional fulfillment, likely through aspects of the relationship and teachable skills, which provided psychological safety and holistic support.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"940-949"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the effect of coaching on errors and burnout on graduate medical education trainees and mechanisms of this effect.

Method: In this explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial at a large, urban academic medical center, trainees and faculty were randomized to coaching with mentorship or mentorship alone from September 2021 to December 2022. Trainees randomized to coaching (coachees) were paired with faculty coaches from different specialties, who were trained in a novel coaching curriculum. Burnout was measured with the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index subscales of professional fulfillment, work exhaustion, interpersonal disengagement, and overall burnout. Medical errors in the past 3 months were self-reported. Focus groups were conducted for each of the 4 cohorts (faculty control, faculty intervention, trainee control, and trainee intervention) to allow for an in-depth exploration of the coaching program experience.

Results: A total of 184 trainees and 150 faculty were randomized to standard mentorship with or without coaching. Paired analysis included 83 trainees (59% female) and 77 faculty (60% female). Difference-in-difference analyses showed reduced burnout among coachees compared with control trainees, with a score difference of -0.37 (95% CI, -0.64 to -0.09). Professional fulfillment improved in coachees, with a score difference of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.16-0.83) compared with control trainees. There were no significant differences in resilience or self-valuation. Coachees had 2.18 times greater odds of reporting no medical error than control trainees (not significant) and were less likely to report being "unsure" about medical error involvement. Qualitative analysis highlighted the importance of specialty discordance in coaching pairs and a coach's holistic awareness of coachee well-being and demonstrated successful uptake and use of coaching skills, particularly positive reframing and normalization.

Conclusions: Coaching improved trainee burnout and professional fulfillment, likely through aspects of the relationship and teachable skills, which provided psychological safety and holistic support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
训练对受训人员职业倦怠、职业成就感和失误的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究探讨辅导对医学研究生教育学员错误和倦怠的影响及其作用机制。方法:在这项解释性、顺序性、混合方法的随机对照试验中,在2021年9月至2022年12月期间,在一个大型城市学术医疗中心,学员和教师被随机分为有指导或单独指导两组。被随机分配到教练组(coachees)的受训者与来自不同专业的教师教练配对,他们接受了一种新的教练课程的培训。职业倦怠采用斯坦福职业满足指数的职业满足、工作疲劳、人际脱离和总体职业倦怠量表进行测量。过去3个月的医疗事故是自我报告的。4组(教师组、教师干预组、学员组和学员干预组)中的每一组都进行了焦点小组讨论,以便深入探讨教练项目的经验。结果:184名受训者和150名教师被随机分配到有或没有指导的标准指导组。配对分析包括83名学员(59%为女性)和77名教员(60%为女性)。差异中差异分析显示,与对照组学员相比,教练员的倦怠程度有所降低,得分差异为-0.37 (95% CI, -0.64至-0.09)。教练员的职业成就感有所提高,与对照组相比,得分差异为0.50 (95% CI, 0.16-0.83)。心理弹性和自我评价没有显著差异。教练员报告没有医疗差错的几率是对照组受训者的2.18倍(不显著),报告“不确定”医疗差错参与的可能性更小。定性分析强调了教练对专业不协调的重要性,以及教练对教练员福祉的整体意识,并展示了成功吸收和使用教练技能,特别是积极的重构和正常化。结论:教练改善了学员的职业倦怠和职业成就感,可能是通过关系和可教技能的方面,提供了心理安全和整体支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Searching for Reliability: Looking Beyond Student Satisfaction Surveys. Supporting family building during medical school: a student-led, curriculum-aligned parental leave policy model. Can Objective Structured Clinical Examinations authentically assess clinical reasoning skills? Can we think through it together? Quiet Quitting as Moral Self-Protection in Medical Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1