{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of a Protocol for In-Office Pediatric Aural Foreign Body Removal.","authors":"Dilan Prasad, Glenn Isaacson","doi":"10.1002/lary.32073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the safety and efficacy of a step-by-step protocol for the office removal of aural foreign bodies (FB) in a pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All children presenting to an academic pediatric outpatient department were identified from a computerized collection of office notes and operative reports. FB removal was performed in a standard fashion including: (1) pre-procedure discussion with shared decision making, (2) restraint in a supine position with a trained second person holding the head, (3) FB removal using an operative microscope and instrumentation. A case was considered a failure if subsequent removal under sedation or general anesthesia was required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>447 total cases (ears) were identified in 428 children (19 had bilateral FBs). 201/428 (47%) of children had previous attempts at FB removal elsewhere. 431/447 (96.4%) of FBs were successfully extracted in the office. 16/447 (3.6%) of FBs were removed in the operating room. Out of the 431 successful removals, two patients had minor complications (ear canal lacerations). No child suffered a more severe complication. The failed removal group was more likely to have a documented neurodevelopmental disorder (4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This protocol resulted in a high rate of successful FB removal, even in children with prior failed attempts. There were no significant ear injuries in this 22-year experience, which included children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder. This approach should be considered by otolaryngologists who care for children in the office setting.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3-Retrospective review.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the safety and efficacy of a step-by-step protocol for the office removal of aural foreign bodies (FB) in a pediatric population.
Methods: All children presenting to an academic pediatric outpatient department were identified from a computerized collection of office notes and operative reports. FB removal was performed in a standard fashion including: (1) pre-procedure discussion with shared decision making, (2) restraint in a supine position with a trained second person holding the head, (3) FB removal using an operative microscope and instrumentation. A case was considered a failure if subsequent removal under sedation or general anesthesia was required.
Results: 447 total cases (ears) were identified in 428 children (19 had bilateral FBs). 201/428 (47%) of children had previous attempts at FB removal elsewhere. 431/447 (96.4%) of FBs were successfully extracted in the office. 16/447 (3.6%) of FBs were removed in the operating room. Out of the 431 successful removals, two patients had minor complications (ear canal lacerations). No child suffered a more severe complication. The failed removal group was more likely to have a documented neurodevelopmental disorder (4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001).
Conclusion: This protocol resulted in a high rate of successful FB removal, even in children with prior failed attempts. There were no significant ear injuries in this 22-year experience, which included children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder. This approach should be considered by otolaryngologists who care for children in the office setting.
期刊介绍:
The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope.
• Broncho-esophagology
• Communicative disorders
• Head and neck surgery
• Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery
• Oncology
• Speech and hearing defects