Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity in People With Young-Onset, Aged 18-40 Years Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17691
Xiaoyan Zhao, Maria Duaso, Haya Abu Ghazaleh, Xiaodi Guo, Angus Forbes
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity in People With Young-Onset, Aged 18-40 Years Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Xiaoyan Zhao, Maria Duaso, Haya Abu Ghazaleh, Xiaodi Guo, Angus Forbes","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the barriers and facilitators to physical activity engagement among people with young-onset type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative research design using individual semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit individuals with young-onset type 2 diabetes through social media, based on: age, gender, diabetes duration, diabetes complication and physical activity level. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework analysis integrating the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three individuals with type 2 diabetes (median age 29 years; 13 women; median diabetes duration 1 year) were interviewed. Nineteen subthemes were identified across all domains of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model. The most common domains and the related subthemes were psychological capability (physical activity knowledge, self-monitoring); social opportunity (stigma, family commitments, guidance from professionals, interactive physical activity, emotional support); and reflective motivation (perceived physical impact of physical activity, perceived mental impact of physical activity, social role & responsibility, perceived self-efficacy). Interactions were also observed between the different domains of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed in-depth and novel information on the barriers and facilitators to physical activity in people with young-onset type 2 diabetes. Future interventions would require multimodal approaches to enhance physical activity motivation in this population by addressing these underpinning psychological and social barriers.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>This study highlighted the need for a multimodal strategy that addresses psychological capability, social opportunity and reflective motivation for increasing physical activity in people with young-onset type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>An advisory group including six individuals with young-onset type 2 diabetes contributed to the design of the interview topic guide.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore the barriers and facilitators to physical activity engagement among people with young-onset type 2 diabetes.

Design: A qualitative research design using individual semi-structured interviews.

Methods: A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit individuals with young-onset type 2 diabetes through social media, based on: age, gender, diabetes duration, diabetes complication and physical activity level. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework analysis integrating the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model.

Results: Twenty-three individuals with type 2 diabetes (median age 29 years; 13 women; median diabetes duration 1 year) were interviewed. Nineteen subthemes were identified across all domains of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model. The most common domains and the related subthemes were psychological capability (physical activity knowledge, self-monitoring); social opportunity (stigma, family commitments, guidance from professionals, interactive physical activity, emotional support); and reflective motivation (perceived physical impact of physical activity, perceived mental impact of physical activity, social role & responsibility, perceived self-efficacy). Interactions were also observed between the different domains of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model.

Conclusion: This study revealed in-depth and novel information on the barriers and facilitators to physical activity in people with young-onset type 2 diabetes. Future interventions would require multimodal approaches to enhance physical activity motivation in this population by addressing these underpinning psychological and social barriers.

Implications for the profession and patient care: This study highlighted the need for a multimodal strategy that addresses psychological capability, social opportunity and reflective motivation for increasing physical activity in people with young-onset type 2 diabetes.

Reporting method: This study was reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.

Patient or public contribution: An advisory group including six individuals with young-onset type 2 diabetes contributed to the design of the interview topic guide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity in People With Young-Onset, Aged 18-40 Years Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study. The Effect of Communication in Emergency Department Isolation Rooms Using Smart Glasses: A Mixed-Methods Study. Pediatric Nurses' Challenges in Implementing and Sustaining Clinical Handover in Intensive Care Units: Advocating for the Safety of Critically Ill Paediatric Patients. Sexual and Gender Minority Migrants' Experiences of Health Service Access and Utilisation: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. The Effectiveness of Telehealth Self-Management Interventions to Improve the Health Outcomes of Adults Undergoing Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1