Pupil dilation accompanying successful recognition is linearly related to memory precision.

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1037/xlm0001467
Ádám Albi, Péter Pajkossy
{"title":"Pupil dilation accompanying successful recognition is linearly related to memory precision.","authors":"Ádám Albi, Péter Pajkossy","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a recognition memory task, correct \"old\" responses to previously studied target items (hits) trigger larger pupil dilation (PD) than correct \"new\" responses to previously not presented foil items (correct rejections). This pupil old/new effect reflects the specific processes involved in recognition decisions, with dilation being larger when decisions are based on recollection of contextual details rather than mere familiarity. However, previous research has been limited in determining the exact link between PD and recognition processes due to the categorical nature of tasks used to assess recollection/familiarity. To investigate this issue, we examined whether the precision of the recollected memory representation is related to PD during successful recognition. During encoding, target words were presented on the outline of an invisible circle, and during a subsequent recognition task, participants made old/new decisions. For \"old\" responses, participants had to indicate the exact location of the target on the outline of the invisible circle. We found that larger PD during the old/new decision was related to more precise subsequent localization decision. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that PD and memory precision are linearly related, and even hits followed by unprecise source localization trigger larger PD than correct rejections. Thus, increased PD is present for all recognition decisions, but its magnitude increases with increasing precision of source recollection. This pattern of results suggests that the pupil old/new effect might originate from two distinct components: The first is related to the mere recognition of a word, whereas the second reflects the quality of recollected source information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1926-1940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a recognition memory task, correct "old" responses to previously studied target items (hits) trigger larger pupil dilation (PD) than correct "new" responses to previously not presented foil items (correct rejections). This pupil old/new effect reflects the specific processes involved in recognition decisions, with dilation being larger when decisions are based on recollection of contextual details rather than mere familiarity. However, previous research has been limited in determining the exact link between PD and recognition processes due to the categorical nature of tasks used to assess recollection/familiarity. To investigate this issue, we examined whether the precision of the recollected memory representation is related to PD during successful recognition. During encoding, target words were presented on the outline of an invisible circle, and during a subsequent recognition task, participants made old/new decisions. For "old" responses, participants had to indicate the exact location of the target on the outline of the invisible circle. We found that larger PD during the old/new decision was related to more precise subsequent localization decision. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that PD and memory precision are linearly related, and even hits followed by unprecise source localization trigger larger PD than correct rejections. Thus, increased PD is present for all recognition decisions, but its magnitude increases with increasing precision of source recollection. This pattern of results suggests that the pupil old/new effect might originate from two distinct components: The first is related to the mere recognition of a word, whereas the second reflects the quality of recollected source information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成功识别时瞳孔扩张与记忆精度呈线性相关。
在识别记忆任务中,对先前研究过的目标项目(命中)做出正确的“旧”反应,会比对先前没有出现过的目标项目(正确的拒绝)做出正确的“新”反应触发更大的瞳孔扩张(PD)。这种瞳孔新旧效应反映了识别决策所涉及的特定过程,当决策是基于上下文细节的回忆而不是仅仅基于熟悉时,扩张会更大。然而,由于用于评估回忆/熟悉度的任务的分类性质,先前的研究在确定PD和识别过程之间的确切联系方面受到限制。为了研究这个问题,我们研究了在成功识别过程中,记忆再现的精度是否与PD有关。在编码过程中,目标单词被呈现在一个看不见的圆圈的轮廓上,在随后的识别任务中,参与者做出旧/新决定。对于“旧”的回答,参与者必须在看不见的圆圈的轮廓上指出目标的确切位置。我们发现在旧/新决策过程中较大的PD与更精确的后续定位决策相关。此外,我们还证明了PD和记忆精度是线性相关的,甚至命中后不精确的源定位也会比正确的拒绝触发更大的PD。因此,增加的PD存在于所有识别决策中,但其幅度随着源回忆精度的增加而增加。这种结果模式表明,瞳孔的新旧效应可能源于两个不同的组成部分:第一个与仅仅识别一个单词有关,而第二个反映了记忆源信息的质量。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Examining working memory precision estimates as an individual difference. The lexical boost in structural priming: The syntactic head matters but adjacency does not. Statistical learning of orthotactic constraints: Evidence from typing. Dynamic adjustment of the eye-voice span and articulation duration in the course of multi-item naming tasks: Evidence for lockout scheduling. Choosing to avoid: The evaluative impact of autonomous selection of approach and avoidance behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1